Moussavi Zahra, Rutherford Grant, Lithgow Brian, Millikin Colleen, Modirrousta Mandana, Mansouri Behzad, Wang Xikui, Omelan Craig, Fellows Lesley, Fitzgerald Paul, Koski Lisa
Biomedical Engineering Program, The University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
Department of Clinical Health Psychology, Max Rady College of Medicine, The University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
JMIR Res Protoc. 2021 Jan 8;10(1):e25144. doi: 10.2196/25144.
BACKGROUND: Alzheimer disease has no known cure. As existing pharmacologic interventions only modestly slow cognitive decline, there is a need for new treatments. Recent trials of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) have reported encouraging results for improving or stabilizing cognition in patients diagnosed with Alzheimer dementia. However, owing to small samples and lack of a well-controlled double-blind design, the results to date are inconclusive. This paper presents the protocol for a large placebo-controlled double-blind study designed with sufficient statistical rigor to measure the efficacy of rTMS treatment in patients with Alzheimer dementia. OBJECTIVE: The objectives are to (1) recruit and enroll up to 200 eligible participants, (2) estimate the difference in treatment effects between active treatment and sham treatment, (3) estimate the difference in treatment effects between two doses of rTMS applications, (4) estimate the duration of treatment effects among responders to active rTMS treatment, and (5) estimate the effect of dementia severity on treatment outcomes among patients receiving active rTMS treatment. METHODS: We have designed our study to be a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial investigating the short- and long-term (up to 6 months) benefits of active rTMS treatment at two doses (10 sessions over 2 weeks and 20 sessions over 4 weeks) compared with sham rTMS treatment. The study will include patients aged ≥55 years who are diagnosed with Alzheimer disease at an early to moderate stage and have no history of seizures and no major depression. The primary outcome measure is the change in the Alzheimer Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale score from pretreatment to posttreatment. Secondary outcomes are changes in performance on tests of frontal lobe functioning (Stroop test and verbal fluency), changes in neuropsychiatric symptoms (Neuropsychiatric Inventory Questionnaire), and changes in activities of daily living (Alzheimer Disease Co-operative Study-Activities of Daily Living Inventory). Tolerability of the intervention will be assessed using a modification of the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication. We assess participants at baseline and 3, 5, 8, 16, and 24 weeks after the intervention. RESULTS: As of November 1, 2020, we have screened 523 individuals, out of which 133 were eligible and have been enrolled. Out of the 133 individuals, 104 have completed the study. Moreover, as of November 1, 2020, there has been no serious adverse event. We anticipate that rTMS will considerably improve cognitive function, with effects lasting up to 3 months. Moreover, we expect rTMS to be a well-tolerated treatment with no serious side effect. CONCLUSIONS: This protocol design will allow to address both the rTMS active treatment dose and its short- and long-term effects compared with sham treatment in large samples. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02908815; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02908815. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/25144.
背景:阿尔茨海默病尚无已知的治愈方法。由于现有的药物干预措施只能适度减缓认知衰退,因此需要新的治疗方法。最近关于重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)的试验报告了在改善或稳定被诊断为阿尔茨海默病痴呆症患者认知方面的鼓舞人心的结果。然而,由于样本量小且缺乏严格对照的双盲设计,迄今为止的结果尚无定论。本文介绍了一项大型安慰剂对照双盲研究的方案,该研究设计具有足够的统计严谨性,以衡量rTMS治疗对阿尔茨海默病痴呆症患者的疗效。 目的:目标是(1)招募并纳入多达200名符合条件的参与者,(2)估计积极治疗与假治疗之间的治疗效果差异,(3)估计两剂量rTMS应用之间的治疗效果差异,(4)估计积极rTMS治疗反应者的治疗效果持续时间,以及(5)估计痴呆严重程度对接受积极rTMS治疗患者治疗结果的影响。 方法:我们将研究设计为一项双盲、随机、安慰剂对照临床试验,调查两剂量(2周内10次疗程和4周内20次疗程)的积极rTMS治疗与假rTMS治疗相比的短期和长期(长达6个月)益处。该研究将纳入年龄≥55岁、被诊断为早期至中度阿尔茨海默病且无癫痫病史和无重度抑郁症的患者。主要结局指标是从治疗前到治疗后阿尔茨海默病评估量表认知子量表评分的变化。次要结局包括额叶功能测试(斯特鲁普测试和语言流畅性)表现的变化、神经精神症状(神经精神问卷)的变化以及日常生活活动(阿尔茨海默病协作研究日常生活活动量表)的变化。将使用药物治疗满意度问卷的修改版评估干预措施的耐受性。我们在基线以及干预后3、5、8、16和24周对参与者进行评估。 结果:截至2020年11月1日,我们已筛查523人,其中133人符合条件并已入组。在这133人中,104人已完成研究。此外,截至2020年11月1日,未发生严重不良事件。我们预计rTMS将显著改善认知功能,效果可持续长达3个月。此外,我们预计rTMS是一种耐受性良好的治疗方法,无严重副作用。 结论:该方案设计将能够在大样本中解决rTMS积极治疗剂量及其与假治疗相比的短期和长期效果问题。 试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02908815;https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02908815。 国际注册报告识别码(IRRID):DERR1-10.2196/25144。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2024-1-30
Neurosci Lett. 2020-2-6
Nat Commun. 2016-1-8