Biomedical Engineering, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB Canada; Riverview Health Center, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
Biomedical Engineering, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB Canada.
Neurotherapeutics. 2024 Apr;21(3):e00331. doi: 10.1016/j.neurot.2024.e00331. Epub 2024 Feb 14.
We report results of a large multisite double-blind randomized trial investigating the short and long-term efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) applied to patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD) at mild to moderate stages, in doses of either 2 or 4 weeks of treatment (5 days/week), whilst compared with 4 weeks of sham rTMS. Randomization to treatment group was stratified based on age and severity. The objectives of this study were to: 1) investigate the efficacy of active rTMS versus sham, 2) investigate the effect of dose of treatment (2 or 4 weeks), and 3) investigate the length of benefits from treatment. The rTMS pulses (20 Hz, 30 pulses/train, 25 trains, 10-s intertrain interval) were applied serially to the left and right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex using neuro-navigation. We compared the primary outcome measure's (ADAS-Cog) score changes from pre- to post-treatment, with assessments at baseline and 4 more times up to 6 months post-treatment. Data of 135 patients were analyzed. The mean total ADAS-Cog score at baseline did not differ between the active and sham treatment groups, nor across the three study sites. The overall results show significant cognitive improvement after treatment up to two months post-treatment with either sham or active coils. The results show both short and long-term benefits of active rTMS treatment but also show similar benefits for sham coil treatment of mild/moderate AD. We discuss this finding in the context of the existing literature on rTMS therapy for AD, as well as evidence of the sham coil's potential to induce a low-level current in the brain. TRIAL REGISTRATION: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02908815.
我们报告了一项大型多中心双盲随机试验的结果,该试验研究了重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)在轻度至中度阿尔茨海默病(AD)患者中的短期和长期疗效,治疗剂量为 2 或 4 周(每周 5 天),同时与 4 周假 rTMS 进行比较。随机分组基于年龄和严重程度进行分层。本研究的目的是:1)研究活性 rTMS 与假刺激的疗效,2)研究治疗剂量(2 或 4 周)的影响,3)研究治疗获益的持续时间。rTMS 脉冲(20 Hz,30 个脉冲/训练,25 个训练,10 秒的训练间隔)使用神经导航连续施加于左侧和右侧背外侧前额叶皮层。我们比较了从治疗前到治疗后的主要结局测量(ADAS-Cog)评分变化,并在基线和治疗后 4 次评估,直到 6 个月。对 135 名患者的数据进行了分析。在活跃和假治疗组之间,以及在三个研究地点之间,基线时的 ADAS-Cog 总分无差异。总体结果显示,无论使用假刺激线圈还是活性线圈,治疗后直至两个月均可显著改善认知。结果表明,活性 rTMS 治疗具有短期和长期获益,但假刺激线圈治疗轻度/中度 AD 也具有相似的获益。我们在 rTMS 治疗 AD 的现有文献以及假刺激线圈在大脑中产生低水平电流的证据的背景下讨论了这一发现。试验注册:https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02908815。