Centre for Brain and Mental Health, Program in Neurosciences & Mental Health, Sick Kids Research Institute, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada; The Margaret and Wallace McCain Centre for Child, Youth & Family Mental Health, Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute, The Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Canada; Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Temerty Centre for Therapeutic Brain Intervention, Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Brain Stimul. 2020 May-Jun;13(3):539-547. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2020.01.007. Epub 2020 Jan 15.
In youth and young adults with autism spectrum disorder (ASD), executive function (EF) deficits may be a promising treatment target with potential impact on everyday functioning.
To conduct a pilot randomized, double-blind, parallel, controlled trial evaluating repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) for EF deficits in ASD.
In Toronto, Ontario (November 2014 to June 2017), a 20-session, 4-week course of 20 Hz rTMS targeting dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) (90%RMT) was compared to sham stimulation in 16-35 year-olds with ASD (28 male/12 female), without intellectual disability, who had impaired everyday EF performance (n = 20 active/n = 20 sham). Outcome measures evaluated protocol feasibility and clinical effects of active vs. sham rTMS on EF performance. The moderating effect of baseline functioning was explored.
Of eligible participants, 95% were enrolled and 95% of randomized participants completed the protocol. Adverse events across treatment arms were mild-to-moderate. There was no significant difference between active vs. sham rTMS on EF performance. Baseline adaptive functioning moderated the effect of rTMS, such that participants with lower baseline functioning experienced significant EF improvement in the active vs. sham group.
Our pilot RCT demonstrated the feasibility and acceptability of using high frequency rTMS targeting DLPFC in youth and young adults with autism. No evidence for efficacy of active versus sham rTMS on EF performance was found. However, we found promising preliminary evidence of EF performance improvement following active versus sham rTMS in participants with ASD with more severe adaptive functioning deficits. Future work could focus on examining efficacy of rTMS in this higher-need population.
Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) for Executive Function Deficits in Autism Spectrum Disorder and Effects on Brain Structure: A Pilot Study; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02311751?term = ameis&rank = 1; NCT02311751. The trial was funded by: an American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry (AACAP) Pilot Research Award, the Innovation Fund from the Alternate Funding Plan of the Academic Health Sciences Centres of Ontario, and an Ontario Mental Health Foundation (OMHF) Project A Grant and New Investigator Fellowship.
在患有自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)的青年和年轻人中,执行功能(EF)缺陷可能是一个有希望的治疗靶点,对日常功能有潜在影响。
进行一项先导随机、双盲、平行、对照试验,评估重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)对 ASD 患者 EF 缺陷的疗效。
在安大略省多伦多市(2014 年 11 月至 2017 年 6 月),对 16 至 35 岁的 ASD 患者(28 名男性/12 名女性)进行了一项 20 节、4 周的 20Hz rTMS 课程,针对背外侧前额叶皮层(DLPFC)(90%RMT),与假刺激进行了比较,这些患者没有智力障碍,但日常生活 EF 表现受损(主动组 n=20/假刺激组 n=20)。评估了主动与假 rTMS 对 EF 表现的方案可行性和临床效果。还探讨了基线功能的调节作用。
符合条件的参与者中,95%的人被纳入研究,95%的随机参与者完成了方案。治疗组的不良事件均为轻度至中度。主动 rTMS 与 sham rTMS 对 EF 表现无显著差异。基线适应性功能调节了 rTMS 的效果,因此基线功能较低的参与者在主动组和 sham 组中 EF 都有显著改善。
我们的先导 RCT 表明,在自闭症青少年和年轻人中使用高频 rTMS 靶向 DLPFC 是可行和可接受的。未发现主动 rTMS 与 sham rTMS 在 EF 表现上的疗效差异。然而,我们发现,在 ASD 患者中,与 sham rTMS 相比,主动 rTMS 可显著改善 EF 表现,这些患者的适应性功能缺陷更为严重。未来的工作可以集中研究 rTMS 在这一高需求人群中的疗效。
重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)治疗自闭症谱系障碍的执行功能缺陷及其对大脑结构的影响:一项先导研究;https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02311751?term=ameis&rank=1;NCT02311751。该试验由以下机构资助:美国儿童和青少年精神病学会(AACAP)的一项先导研究奖、安大略省替代筹资计划的创新基金、安大略省心理健康基金会(OMHF)的项目 A 赠款和新研究员奖学金。