Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2020;14(2):187-195. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2020.0018.
The literature on community-engaged research provides important principles to guide research partnerships, but concrete descriptions of the complexities involved in developing, navigating, and maintaining such partnerships are lacking.
To describe and assess a longstanding, complex research partnership between Indigenous and academic pharmacogenetic research partners, with attention to co-learning and capacity building lessons learned.
Descriptive thematic analysis of 11 semistructured interviews with interdisciplinary research partners situated at Indigenous and academic settings.
Lessons learned included the need for explicit negotiation around mentoring expectations, and discussion on advisory and staff roles. Partners need to be aware not only of the structures, policies, and hierarchies within each partner institution, but also the tacit value commitments and understandings entailed in their different missions.
This study highlights that the concept of "bidirectional" learning as it is usually presented in the literature fails to capture the complexity of how partnerships work.
社区参与式研究的文献提供了重要的原则来指导研究伙伴关系，但缺乏对发展、导航和维持这种伙伴关系所涉及的复杂性的具体描述。
描述和评估一个长期存在的、复杂的印第安人和学术药物遗传学研究伙伴之间的研究伙伴关系，关注共同学习和能力建设的经验教训。
对位于印第安人和学术环境中的跨学科研究伙伴的 11 次半结构化访谈进行描述性主题分析。
经验教训包括需要明确协商指导期望，并讨论咨询和工作人员角色。合作伙伴不仅需要了解每个合作伙伴机构内部的结构、政策和层次结构，还需要了解其不同使命所涉及的隐性价值承诺和理解。
本研究强调，文献中通常提出的“双向”学习概念未能捕捉到伙伴关系运作的复杂性。
