Suppr超能文献

2 型心肌梗死:诊断和风险分层的新方法。

Type 2 Myocardial Infarction: Evolving Approaches to Diagnosis and Risk-Stratification.

机构信息

BHF Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Edinburgh, UK.

Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.

出版信息

Clin Chem. 2021 Jan 8;67(1):61-69. doi: 10.1093/clinchem/hvaa189.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Type 2 myocardial infarction (T2MI) is frequently encountered in clinical practice and associated with adverse outcomes.

CONTENT

T2MI occurs most frequently due to noncoronary etiologies that alter myocardial oxygen supply and/or demand. The diagnosis of T2MI is often confused with acute nonischemic myocardial injury, in part because of difficulties in delineating the nature of symptoms and misunderstandings about disease categorization. The use of objective features of myocardial ischemia using electrocardiographic (ECG) or imaging abnormalities may facilitate more precise T2MI diagnosis. High-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTn) assays allow rapid MI diagnosis and risk stratification, yet neither maximum nor delta values facilitate differentiation of T2MI from T1MI. Several investigational biomarkers have been evaluated for T2MI, but none have robust data. There is interest in evaluating risk profiles among patients with T2MI. Clinically, the magnitude of maximum and delta cTn values as well as the presence and magnitude of ischemia on ECG or imaging is used to indicate disease severity. Scoring systems such as GRACE, TIMI, and TARRACO have been evaluated, but all have limited to modest performance, with substantial variation in time intervals used for risk-assessment and endpoints used.

SUMMARY

The diagnosis of T2MI requires biomarker evidence of acute myocardial injury and clear clinical evidence of acute myocardial ischemia without atherothrombosis. T2MIs are most often caused by noncoronary etiologies that alter myocardial oxygen supply and/or demand. They are increasingly encountered in clinical practice and associated with poor short- and long-term outcomes. Clinicians require novel biomarker or imaging approaches to facilitate diagnosis and risk-stratification.

摘要

背景

2 型心肌梗死(T2MI)在临床实践中经常遇到,并与不良结局相关。

内容

T2MI 最常由改变心肌氧供应和/或需求的非冠状动脉病因引起。T2MI 的诊断常与急性非缺血性心肌损伤混淆,部分原因是难以描绘症状的性质和对疾病分类的误解。使用心电图(ECG)或影像学异常的心肌缺血客观特征可能有助于更准确地诊断 T2MI。高敏心肌肌钙蛋白(hs-cTn)检测可快速诊断心肌梗死和进行风险分层,但最大或差值值均不能帮助区分 T2MI 与 T1MI。已经评估了几种用于 T2MI 的研究性生物标志物,但没有一种具有可靠的数据。人们对评估 T2MI 患者的风险特征感兴趣。临床上,最大和差值 cTn 值的大小以及 ECG 或影像学上缺血的存在和程度用于指示疾病的严重程度。已经评估了 GRACE、TIMI 和 TARRACO 等评分系统,但所有这些系统的性能都有限,用于风险评估和终点的时间间隔存在很大差异。

总结

T2MI 的诊断需要有急性心肌损伤的生物标志物证据和明确的急性心肌缺血但无动脉粥样血栓形成的临床证据。T2MIs 最常由改变心肌氧供应和/或需求的非冠状动脉病因引起。它们在临床实践中越来越常见,与短期和长期预后不良相关。临床医生需要新的生物标志物或成像方法来促进诊断和风险分层。

相似文献

7
Myocardial Infarction Type 2 and Myocardial Injury.2型心肌梗死与心肌损伤
Clin Chem. 2017 Jan;63(1):101-107. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2016.255521. Epub 2016 Oct 10.
9
Biomarkers Enhance Discrimination and Prognosis of Type 2 Myocardial Infarction.生物标志物增强 2 型心肌梗死的鉴别和预后。
Circulation. 2020 Oct 20;142(16):1532-1544. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.046682. Epub 2020 Aug 21.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

4
A Comparison of Biomarker Rise in Type 1 and Type 2 Myocardial Infarction.1 型和 2 型心肌梗死生物标志物升高的比较。
Am J Med. 2020 Oct;133(10):1203-1208. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2020.02.024. Epub 2020 Mar 29.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验