Suppr超能文献

与固定速率背景输注相比,优化背景输注模式可减少腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者的静脉自控镇痛剂量和阿片类药物消耗量:一项前瞻性、随机、对照、双盲研究。

The Optimizing Background Infusion Mode Decreases Intravenous Patient-Controlled Analgesic Volume and Opioid Consumption Compared to Fixed-Rate Background Infusion in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Double-Blind Study.

作者信息

Jung Ki Tae, So Keum Young, Kim Seung Un, Kim Sang Hun

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, School of Medicine, Chosun University, 309 Pilmun-daero, Dong-gu, Gwangju 61452, Korea.

Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Chosun University Hospital, 365 Pilmun-daero, Dong-gu, Gwangju 61453, Korea.

出版信息

Medicina (Kaunas). 2021 Jan 6;57(1):42. doi: 10.3390/medicina57010042.

Abstract

The fixed-rate continuous background infusion mode with bolus dosing is a common modality for intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (PCA). However, some patients suffer from inadequate analgesia or opioid-related adverse effects due to the biphasic pattern of postoperative pain. Therefore, we investigated the postoperative analgesic efficacy of PCA using an optimizing background infusion mode (OBIM) where the background injection rate varies depending on the patient's bolus demand. We prospectively enrolled 204 patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy in a randomized, controlled, double-blind study. Patients were allocated to either the optimizing (group OBIM) or the traditional background infusion group (group TBIM). The numeric rating scale (NRS) score for pain was evaluated at admission to and discharge from the recovery room, as well as at the 6th, 24th, and 48th postoperative hours. Data on bolus demand count, total infused volume, and background infusion rate were downloaded from the PCA device at 30-min intervals until the 48th postoperative hour. The NRS score was not significantly different between groups throughout the postoperative period ( = 0.621), decreasing with time in both groups ( < 0.001). The bolus demand count was not significantly different between groups throughout ( = 0.756). The mean total cumulative infused PCA volume was lower in group OBIM (84.0 (95% confidence interval: 78.9-89.1) mL) than in group TBIM (102 (97.8-106.0) mL; < 0.001). The total cumulative opioid dose in fentanyl equivalents, after converting sufentanil to fentanyl using an equipotential dose ratio, was lower in group OBIM (714.1 (647.4-780.9) μg) than in group TBIM (963.7 (870.5-1056.9) μg); < 0.001). The background infusion rate was significantly different between groups throughout the study period ( < 0.001); it was higher in group OBIM than in group TBIM before the 12th postoperative hour and lower from the 18th to the 48th postoperative hour. The OBIM combined with bolus dosing reduces the cumulative PCA volume and opioid consumption compared to the TBIM combined with bolus dosing, while yielding comparable postoperative analgesia and bolus demand in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

摘要

持续背景输注固定速率联合推注给药是静脉自控镇痛(PCA)的一种常见模式。然而,由于术后疼痛的双相模式,一些患者存在镇痛不足或阿片类药物相关不良反应。因此,我们研究了使用优化背景输注模式(OBIM)的PCA术后镇痛效果,其中背景注射速率根据患者的推注需求而变化。我们前瞻性地纳入了204例行腹腔镜胆囊切除术的患者,进行一项随机、对照、双盲研究。患者被分配至优化组(OBIM组)或传统背景输注组(TBIM组)。在进入和离开恢复室时,以及术后第6、24和48小时评估疼痛的数字评分量表(NRS)评分。在术后48小时内,每隔30分钟从PCA设备下载一次推注需求计数、总输注量和背景输注速率的数据。术后各时间段两组的NRS评分无显著差异(P = 0.621),两组评分均随时间下降(P < 0.001)。两组的推注需求计数在整个过程中无显著差异(P = 0.756)。OBIM组的平均PCA总累积输注量(84.0(95%置信区间:78.9 - 89.1)mL)低于TBIM组(102(97.8 - 106.0)mL;P < 0.001)。在使用等效剂量比将舒芬太尼换算为芬太尼后,OBIM组以芬太尼当量计的总累积阿片类药物剂量(714.1(647.4 - 780.9)μg)低于TBIM组(963.7(870.5 - 1056.9)μg);P < 0.001。在整个研究期间,两组的背景输注速率有显著差异(P < 0.001);术后第12小时前OBIM组高于TBIM组,术后第18至48小时低于TBIM组。与TBIM联合推注给药相比,OBIM联合推注给药可减少PCA累积量和阿片类药物消耗,同时为行腹腔镜胆囊切除术的患者提供相当的术后镇痛效果和推注需求。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验