Suppr超能文献

舒芬太尼与芬太尼用于腰椎融合术后静脉自控镇痛效果的比较

Comparison of the Effects of Sufentanil and Fentanyl Intravenous Patient Controlled Analgesia after Lumbar Fusion.

作者信息

Kim Do Keun, Yoon Seung Hwan, Kim Ji Yong, Oh Chang Hyun, Jung Jong Kwon, Kim Jin

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Inha University Hospital, Incheon, Korea.

Department of Neurosurgery, Na-Eun Hospital, Incheon, Korea.

出版信息

J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2017 Jan 1;60(1):54-59. doi: 10.3340/jkns.2016.0707.007. Epub 2016 Dec 29.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Postoperative pain is one of the major complaints of patients after lumbar fusion surgery. The authors evaluated the effects of intravenous patient controlled analgesia (IV-PCA) using fentanyl or sufentanil on postoperative pain management and pain-related complications.

METHODS

Forty-two patients that had undergone surgery with lumbar instrumentation and fusion at single or double levels constituted the study cohort. Patients were equally and randomly allocated to a sufentanil group (group S) or a fentanyl group (group F) for patient controlled analgesia (PCA). Group S received sufentanil at a dose of 4 μg/kg IV-PCA and group F received fentanyl 24 μg/kg IV-PCA. A numeric rating scale (NRS) of postoperative pain was applied before surgery, and immediately and at 1, 6, and 24 hours (hrs) after surgery. Oswestry disability index (ODI) scores were obtained before surgery and one month after surgery. Opioid-related side effects were also evaluated.

RESULTS

No significant intergroup difference was observed in NRS or ODI scores at any of the above-mentioned time points. Side effects were more frequent in group F. More specifically, nausea, vomiting rates were significantly higher (=0.04), but pruritus, hypotension, and headache rates were non-significantly different in the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Sufentanil displayed no analgesic advantage over fentanyl postoperatively. However, sufentanil should be considerable for patients at high risk of GI issues, because it had lower postoperative nausea and vomiting rates than fentanyl.

摘要

目的

术后疼痛是腰椎融合手术后患者的主要主诉之一。作者评估了使用芬太尼或舒芬太尼的静脉自控镇痛(IV-PCA)对术后疼痛管理及疼痛相关并发症的影响。

方法

42例接受单节段或双节段腰椎器械固定融合手术的患者构成研究队列。患者被平等随机分配至舒芬太尼组(S组)或芬太尼组(F组)进行自控镇痛(PCA)。S组接受4μg/kg的舒芬太尼IV-PCA,F组接受24μg/kg的芬太尼IV-PCA。术前、术后即刻、术后1小时、6小时和24小时应用术后疼痛数字评分量表(NRS)。术前及术后1个月获取奥斯威斯功能障碍指数(ODI)评分。还评估了阿片类药物相关的副作用。

结果

在上述任何时间点,NRS或ODI评分在两组间均未观察到显著差异。F组的副作用更常见。更具体地说,恶心、呕吐发生率显著更高(=0.04),但两组间瘙痒、低血压和头痛发生率无显著差异。

结论

术后舒芬太尼在镇痛方面未显示出优于芬太尼的优势。然而,对于胃肠道问题高危患者,舒芬太尼应予以考虑,因为其术后恶心和呕吐发生率低于芬太尼。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f2c7/5223752/fd978f5a2062/jkns-60-1-54f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验