• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不应容忍脑死亡判定中的不一致性。

Inconsistency in Brain Death Determination Should Not Be Tolerated.

机构信息

Chief resident in neurology at Boston Medical Center and Boston University School of Medicine in Massachusetts.

Professor and the chair of the Department of Neurology at Boston Medical Center and Boston University School of Medicine in Massachusetts.

出版信息

AMA J Ethics. 2020 Dec 1;22(12):E1027-1032. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2020.1027.

DOI:10.1001/amajethics.2020.1027
PMID:33419503
Abstract

Since it was proposed in 1980, the Uniform Determination of Death Act has provided the legal basis for determination of death by neurological criteria. The act contains language that allows for acceptable medical standards to be used to determine death. Since 1995, the American Academy of Neurology has provided guidelines for brain death determination (revised in 2010), but nationwide adherence to these guidelines has been incomplete. This variability could lead to misdiagnosis and erosion of public trust in this important medical practice. Physicians must work together as a profession to push for uniformity and accuracy in death diagnosis.

摘要

自 1980 年提出以来,《统一死亡判定法案》为神经学标准判定死亡提供了法律依据。该法案包含允许使用可接受的医疗标准来判定死亡的语言。自 1995 年以来,美国神经病学学会一直为脑死亡判定提供指南(2010 年修订),但全国范围内对这些指南的遵守并不完整。这种差异可能导致误诊,并侵蚀公众对这一重要医疗实践的信任。医生必须作为一个专业群体共同努力,推动死亡诊断的统一和准确性。

相似文献

1
Inconsistency in Brain Death Determination Should Not Be Tolerated.不应容忍脑死亡判定中的不一致性。
AMA J Ethics. 2020 Dec 1;22(12):E1027-1032. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2020.1027.
2
The Uniform Determination of Death Act is Being Revised.《统一死亡判定法案》正在修订中。
Neurocrit Care. 2022 Apr;36(2):335-338. doi: 10.1007/s12028-021-01439-2. Epub 2022 Jan 31.
3
Variability of brain death determination guidelines in leading US neurologic institutions.美国主要神经机构脑死亡判定指南的差异
Neurology. 2008 Jan 22;70(4):284-9. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000296278.59487.c2. Epub 2007 Dec 12.
4
The 2023 American Academy of Neurology, American Academy of Pediatrics, Child Neurology Society, and Society of Critical Care Medicine Pediatric and Adult Brain Death/Death by Neurologic Criteria Determination Consensus Guidelines: What the Critical Care Team Needs to Know.2023 年美国神经病学学会、美国儿科学会、儿童神经病学会和危重病医学会儿科和成人脑死亡/神经标准判定死亡共识指南:危重病团队需要了解的内容。
Crit Care Med. 2024 Mar 1;52(3):376-386. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000006099. Epub 2023 Nov 3.
5
Current Practice Diagnosing Brain Death Is Not Consistent With Legal Statutes Requiring the Absence of All Brain Function.当前诊断脑死亡的实践与要求脑功能全部丧失的法律规定不一致。
J Intensive Care Med. 2022 Feb;37(2):153-156. doi: 10.1177/0885066620939037. Epub 2020 Jul 6.
6
Determination of Death by Neurologic Criteria in the United States: The Case for Revising the Uniform Determination of Death Act.美国通过神经学标准判定死亡:修订《统一死亡判定法案》的案例。
J Law Med Ethics. 2019 Dec;47(4_suppl):9-24. doi: 10.1177/1073110519898039.
7
Legal Standards for Brain Death and Undue Influence in Euthanasia Laws.脑死亡的法律标准以及安乐死法律中的不当影响
J Bioeth Inq. 2016 Jun;13(2):173-8. doi: 10.1007/s11673-016-9718-0. Epub 2016 Apr 5.
8
An interdisciplinary response to contemporary concerns about brain death determination.对当代有关脑死亡判定问题的跨学科回应。
Neurology. 2018 Feb 27;90(9):423-426. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000005033. Epub 2018 Jan 31.
9
Variability of Brain Death Policies in the United States.美国脑死亡政策的变异性。
JAMA Neurol. 2016 Feb;73(2):213-8. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2015.3943.
10
Current controversies in brain death determination.脑死亡判定中的当前争议。
Nat Rev Neurol. 2017 Aug;13(8):505-509. doi: 10.1038/nrneurol.2017.72. Epub 2017 May 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Brain Dead or Alive: A Case Report of Inaccurate Neurological Prognostication.脑死还是脑活:一例神经学预后判断失误的病例报告
Cureus. 2024 Dec 11;16(12):e75552. doi: 10.7759/cureus.75552. eCollection 2024 Dec.
2
Education Research: Changes in Medical Students' Knowledge and Attitudes Toward Clinical Death After Teaching the Philosophy of Death.教育研究:讲授死亡哲学后医学生对临床死亡的知识及态度变化
Neurol Educ. 2023 Mar 23;2(2):e200055. doi: 10.1212/NE9.0000000000200055. eCollection 2023 Jun.
3
A Simulation to Improve Understanding and Communication of Ethical Dilemmas That Surround Brain Death.
脑死亡相关伦理困境的理解与沟通模拟研究
MedEdPORTAL. 2024 Sep 26;20:11444. doi: 10.15766/mep_2374-8265.11444. eCollection 2024.
4
Rationale for revisions to the definition of death and criteria for its determination in Canada.加拿大修订死亡定义和确定死亡标准的理由。
Can J Anaesth. 2023 Apr;70(4):558-569. doi: 10.1007/s12630-023-02407-4. Epub 2023 May 2.
5
cDCDD-NRP is consistent with US legal standards for determining death.cDCDD-NRP 与美国判定死亡的法律标准一致。
Am J Transplant. 2022 Oct;22(10):2302-2305. doi: 10.1111/ajt.17083. Epub 2022 May 18.