Suppr超能文献

cDCDD-NRP 与美国判定死亡的法律标准一致。

cDCDD-NRP is consistent with US legal standards for determining death.

机构信息

Southwest Transplant Alliance, Dallas, Texas, USA.

Mid-America Transplant, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.

出版信息

Am J Transplant. 2022 Oct;22(10):2302-2305. doi: 10.1111/ajt.17083. Epub 2022 May 18.

Abstract

Donation after circulatory determination of death (DCDD) has increased organ donation rates in the US over the past decade within an established legal framework, which is consistent with and supports individual and family decisions regarding organ donation in the context of end-of-life care. A new application, controlled DCDD donation utilizing thoracoabdominal normothermic regional perfusion (NRP) protocols (cDCDD-NRP), provides the opportunity to maximize a donation decision by recovering additional organs for transplant, including the heart, and to limit the detrimental impact of warm ischemic time by perfusing organs in situ following the declaration of circulatory death. In this viewpoint, we narrate our rationale for why cDCDD-NRP is consistent within the existing legal framework for organ donation in the United States and recommend no changes to the Uniform Determination of Death Act.

摘要

在既定的法律框架下,美国在过去十年中通过循环判定死亡后的捐献(DCDD)提高了器官捐献率,这与个人和家庭在临终关怀背景下关于器官捐献的决定一致,并为其提供支持。一种新的应用,即利用胸腹部常温区域灌注(NRP)方案的控制性 DCDD 捐献(cDCDD-NRP),为最大化捐献决策提供了机会,可通过回收更多的器官进行移植,包括心脏,并通过在宣布循环死亡后原位灌注器官来限制热缺血时间的不利影响。在这篇观点文章中,我们阐述了为什么 cDCDD-NRP 与美国现有的器官捐献法律框架一致的基本原理,并建议不要修改《统一死亡判定法案》。

相似文献

1
cDCDD-NRP is consistent with US legal standards for determining death.cDCDD-NRP 与美国判定死亡的法律标准一致。
Am J Transplant. 2022 Oct;22(10):2302-2305. doi: 10.1111/ajt.17083. Epub 2022 May 18.

引用本文的文献

2
Thoracoabdominal normothermic regional perfusion: Is it ethical?胸腹常温区域灌注:这符合伦理道德吗?
Monash Bioeth Rev. 2025 Jun;43(1):166-189. doi: 10.1007/s40592-025-00229-2. Epub 2025 Jan 29.
5
Global liver transplantation: emerging trends and ethical challenges.全球肝移植:新兴趋势与伦理挑战。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2023 Oct 25;408(1):418. doi: 10.1007/s00423-023-03144-4.

本文引用的文献

4
Inconsistency in Brain Death Determination Should Not Be Tolerated.不应容忍脑死亡判定中的不一致性。
AMA J Ethics. 2020 Dec 1;22(12):E1027-1032. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2020.1027.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验