• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从诊断到内镜黏膜下剥离术的等待时间与胃肿瘤非治愈性切除的关系。

Association Between Waiting Time from Diagnosis to Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection and Non-curative Resection in Gastric Neoplasm.

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Republic of Korea.

Department of Pathology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Anticancer Res. 2021 Jan;41(1):459-466. doi: 10.21873/anticanres.14796.

DOI:10.21873/anticanres.14796
PMID:33419844
Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIM: Currently, there are no standard guidelines for the waiting time from the diagnosis of gastric neoplasms to endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 1,605 patients who had undergone ESD for early gastric cancer (EGC) or high-grade dysplasia (HGD) were enrolled. Waiting time for ESD was defined as the time from the first diagnosis to ESD. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was conducted.

RESULTS

The curative resection rate was 86.8% and the mean waiting time was 36.8 days. In the multivariable model, longer waiting time did not significantly affect non-curative resection, whereas age >70 years, submucosal fibrosis, and initial cancer diagnosis were significantly associated with non-curative resection. Waiting time was still not identified as a risk factor for non-curative resection in EGC and HGD groups.

CONCLUSION

A longer waiting time from diagnosis to ESD was not associated with non-curative resection.

摘要

背景/目的:目前,对于从胃肿瘤诊断到内镜黏膜下剥离术(ESD)的等待时间,尚无标准指南。

患者和方法

共纳入 1605 名接受内镜黏膜下剥离术(ESD)治疗早期胃癌(EGC)或高级别上皮内瘤变(HGD)的患者。ESD 的等待时间定义为从首次诊断到 ESD 的时间。进行了多变量逻辑回归分析。

结果

完全切除率为 86.8%,平均等待时间为 36.8 天。在多变量模型中,较长的等待时间并不会显著影响非治愈性切除,而年龄>70 岁、黏膜下纤维化和初始癌症诊断与非治愈性切除显著相关。等待时间在 EGC 和 HGD 组中也未被确定为非治愈性切除的危险因素。

结论

从诊断到 ESD 的较长等待时间与非治愈性切除无关。

相似文献

1
Association Between Waiting Time from Diagnosis to Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection and Non-curative Resection in Gastric Neoplasm.从诊断到内镜黏膜下剥离术的等待时间与胃肿瘤非治愈性切除的关系。
Anticancer Res. 2021 Jan;41(1):459-466. doi: 10.21873/anticanres.14796.
2
The superficial elevated and depressed lesion type is an independent factor associated with non-curative endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer.浅表隆起及凹陷型病变是早期胃癌内镜下黏膜下剥离术非治愈性切除的独立相关因素。
Surg Endosc. 2016 Nov;30(11):4880-4888. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-4825-x. Epub 2016 Mar 2.
3
Preprocedural prediction of non-curative endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer.术前预测早期胃癌内镜黏膜下剥离术的疗效。
PLoS One. 2018 Oct 24;13(10):e0206179. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0206179. eCollection 2018.
4
Endoscopic submucosal dissection versus endoscopic mucosal resection for patients with early gastric cancer: a meta-analysis.早期胃癌患者内镜下黏膜下剥离术与内镜下黏膜切除术的Meta分析
BMJ Open. 2019 Dec 23;9(12):e025803. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025803.
5
Endoscopic submucosal dissection for papillary adenocarcinoma of the stomach: low curative resection rate but favorable long-term outcomes after curative resection.内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗胃管状绒毛状腺癌:根治性切除术后的低治愈率,但长期疗效良好。
Gastric Cancer. 2019 Mar;22(2):363-368. doi: 10.1007/s10120-018-0857-3. Epub 2018 Jul 23.
6
[Efficacy comparison between surgical resection and endoscopic submucosal dissection of early gastric cancer in a domestic single center].[国内单中心早期胃癌手术切除与内镜黏膜下剥离术的疗效比较]
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2018 Feb 25;21(2):190-195.
7
Prediction model for non-curative resection of endoscopic submucosal dissection in patients with early gastric cancer.早期胃癌患者内镜下黏膜下剥离术非根治性切除的预测模型
Gastrointest Endosc. 2017 May;85(5):976-983. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2016.10.018. Epub 2016 Oct 15.
8
Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection of Early Gastric Cancer with Mixed-Type Histology: A Systematic Review.内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗混合型早期胃癌的系统评价
Dig Dis Sci. 2020 Jan;65(1):276-291. doi: 10.1007/s10620-019-05761-w. Epub 2019 Jul 31.
9
Clinical outcomes of minimally invasive treatment for early gastric cancer in patients beyond the indications of endoscopic submucosal dissection.内镜黏膜下剥离术适应证外的早期胃癌微创治疗的临床结局。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Sep;32(9):3798-3805. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6105-4. Epub 2018 Feb 20.
10
Long-term outcomes of superficial neoplasia at the esophagogastric junction treated via endoscopic submucosal dissection and endoscopic submucosal tunnel dissection: a cohort study of a single center from China.中国单中心队列研究:经内镜黏膜下剥离术和内镜黏膜下隧道剥离术治疗的食管胃交界部表浅肿瘤的长期结局。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Jan;34(1):216-225. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06753-7. Epub 2019 Apr 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of waiting time for treatment on the progression of superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a single-center retrospective study.治疗等待时间对食管浅表鳞状细胞癌进展的影响:一项单中心回顾性研究。
Esophagus. 2025 Sep 17. doi: 10.1007/s10388-025-01156-1.
2
Gastric Cancer Surgery Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Turkey: A Multicenter Comparison of Prognostic Factors, Mortality, and Survival.土耳其 COVID-19 大流行之前及期间的胃癌手术:预后因素、死亡率和生存率的多中心比较
Medicina (Kaunas). 2025 Jul 24;61(8):1336. doi: 10.3390/medicina61081336.
3
Assessing the Influence of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Gastric Cancer Mortality Risk.
评估2019年冠状病毒病疫情对胃癌死亡风险的影响。
J Clin Med. 2024 Jan 26;13(3):715. doi: 10.3390/jcm13030715.
4
Reevaluation of the expanded indications in undifferentiated early gastric cancer for endoscopic submucosal dissection.内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗未分化型早期胃癌扩大适应证的再评价。
World J Gastroenterol. 2022 Apr 21;28(15):1548-1562. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i15.1548.