• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

治疗等待时间对食管浅表鳞状细胞癌进展的影响:一项单中心回顾性研究。

Impact of waiting time for treatment on the progression of superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a single-center retrospective study.

作者信息

Maeda Hidehito, Sasaki Fumisato, Koyoshi Naohiro, Uehara Shohei, Sakae Takahiro, Tanaka Akihito, Hinokuchi Makoto, Arima Shiho, Hashimoto Shinichi, Kanmura Shuji

机构信息

Digestive and Lifestyle Diseases, Kagoshima University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Kagoshima, Japan.

出版信息

Esophagus. 2025 Sep 17. doi: 10.1007/s10388-025-01156-1.

DOI:10.1007/s10388-025-01156-1
PMID:40963075
Abstract

BACKGROUND

We aimed to identify an acceptable waiting period between the diagnosis of superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (SESCC) and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD).

METHODS

This retrospective, single-center study included 423 patients with 514 SESCC lesions. All patients underwent image-enhanced magnifying endoscopy at initial evaluation and on the day of ESD. Following three outcomes were assessed: the diagnostic accuracy of tumor invasion depth on the day of ESD using the Japanese Esophageal Society classification; changes in diagnosis between initial and final evaluations across different waiting intervals; and 5-year survival rates based on intrapapillary capillary loop patterns (B1 vs. B2) and waiting duration.

RESULTS

The diagnostic accuracy was 96.6% for B1 vessels (EP/LPM), 59.6% for B2 vessels (MM/SM1), and 84.6% for B3 vessels (SM2 or deeper). Among B1 lesions, 100% remained B1 on the day of ESD across all time groups. For B2 lesions, stability was observed in 100% of cases within one month, 98.2% in one to two months, 92.9% in two to three months, and 100% after three months. Five-year survival rates showed no significant differences among waiting period groups in both B1 and B2 categories.

CONCLUSIONS

A waiting period of 3 months is acceptable for patients with SESCC classified as B1 vessels, provided the diagnostic accuracy is maintained. Thorough endoscopic evaluation supports safe scheduling flexibility without adversely affecting long-term outcomes.

摘要

背景

我们旨在确定浅表性食管鳞状细胞癌(SESCC)诊断与内镜下黏膜下剥离术(ESD)之间可接受的等待期。

方法

这项回顾性单中心研究纳入了423例患有514处SESCC病变的患者。所有患者在初次评估时以及ESD当天均接受了图像增强放大内镜检查。评估了以下三项结果:使用日本食管学会分类法在ESD当天对肿瘤浸润深度的诊断准确性;不同等待间隔下初次评估与最终评估之间的诊断变化;以及基于乳头内毛细血管袢模式(B1与B2)和等待时间的5年生存率。

结果

B1血管(上皮乳头内毛细血管袢/黏膜肌层)的诊断准确率为96.6%,B2血管(黏膜下层浅层/黏膜下层深层)为59.6%,B3血管(黏膜下层深层或更深层)为84.6%。在B1病变中,所有时间组的病变在ESD当天均保持为B1。对于B2病变,100%的病例在1个月内保持稳定,1至2个月内为98.2%,2至3个月内为92.9%,3个月后为100%。B1和B2类别的等待期组之间的5年生存率无显著差异。

结论

对于分类为B1血管的SESCC患者,3个月的等待期是可以接受的,前提是保持诊断准确性。全面的内镜评估支持安全的时间安排灵活性,而不会对长期结果产生不利影响。

相似文献

1
Impact of waiting time for treatment on the progression of superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a single-center retrospective study.治疗等待时间对食管浅表鳞状细胞癌进展的影响:一项单中心回顾性研究。
Esophagus. 2025 Sep 17. doi: 10.1007/s10388-025-01156-1.
2
Exploration of a new intrapapillary capillary loop classification in diagnosis of superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma staging: a meta-analysis and single-center study.探讨一种新的食管黏膜内毛细血管袢在诊断浅表性食管鳞状细胞癌分期中的分类方法: 荟萃分析和单中心研究。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2020 Jun;146(6):1479-1488. doi: 10.1007/s00432-020-03199-6. Epub 2020 Mar 31.
3
Endoscopic submucosal dissection versus surgery for T1b esophageal carcinoma: a single-center retrospective study.内镜黏膜下剥离术与手术治疗 T1b 期食管鳞癌的对比:一项单中心回顾性研究。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2024 May 9;150(5):248. doi: 10.1007/s00432-024-05724-3.
4
INTEROBSERVER AGREEMENT OF INTRAPAPILLARY CAPILLARY LOOPS CLASSIFICATION FOR SUPERFICIAL ESOPHAGEAL SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA IN A WESTERN CENTER.西方某中心食管浅表鳞状细胞癌乳头内毛细血管襻分类的观察者间一致性
Arq Gastroenterol. 2025 Sep 5;62:e24120. doi: 10.1590/S0004-2803.24612024-120. eCollection 2025.
5
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
6
Endoscopic and surgical resection of T1a/T1b esophageal neoplasms: a systematic review.内镜及手术切除 T1a/T1b 食管肿瘤:系统评价。
World J Gastroenterol. 2013 Mar 7;19(9):1424-37. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i9.1424.
7
Non-pharmacological interventions for somatoform disorders and medically unexplained physical symptoms (MUPS) in adults.成人躯体形式障碍和医学无法解释的身体症状(MUPS)的非药物干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Nov 1;2014(11):CD011142. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011142.pub2.
8
Does Augmenting Irradiated Autografts With Free Vascularized Fibula Graft in Patients With Bone Loss From a Malignant Tumor Achieve Union, Function, and Complication Rate Comparably to Patients Without Bone Loss and Augmentation When Reconstructing Intercalary Resections in the Lower Extremity?对于因恶性肿瘤导致骨缺损的患者,在重建下肢节段性切除时,采用带血管游离腓骨移植来增强照射后的自体骨移植,其骨愈合、功能及并发症发生率与无骨缺损且未进行增强的患者相比是否相当?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Jun 26. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003599.
9
Comparison of Two Modern Survival Prediction Tools, SORG-MLA and METSSS, in Patients With Symptomatic Long-bone Metastases Who Underwent Local Treatment With Surgery Followed by Radiotherapy and With Radiotherapy Alone.两种现代生存预测工具 SORG-MLA 和 METSSS 在接受手术联合放疗和单纯放疗治疗有症状长骨转移患者中的比较。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Dec 1;482(12):2193-2208. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003185. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
10
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.

本文引用的文献

1
Japanese Classification of Esophageal Cancer, 12th Edition: Part I.日本食管癌分类第 12 版:第一部分。
Esophagus. 2024 Jul;21(3):179-215. doi: 10.1007/s10388-024-01054-y. Epub 2024 Apr 3.
2
Endoscopic submucosal dissection techniques and technology: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Technical Review.内镜黏膜下剥离术技术:欧洲胃肠道内镜学会(ESGE)技术评论。
Endoscopy. 2023 Apr;55(4):361-389. doi: 10.1055/a-2031-0874. Epub 2023 Mar 7.
3
Two cases of esophageal basaloid squamous cell carcinoma which achieved long-term survival by endoscopic submucosal dissection and additional chemoradiotherapy.
DEN Open. 2023 Jan 31;3(1):e211. doi: 10.1002/deo2.211. eCollection 2023 Apr.
4
Epidemiology of esophageal cancer in 2020 and projections to 2030 and 2040.2020 年食管癌流行病学及 2030 年和 2040 年预测。
Thorac Cancer. 2023 Jan;14(1):3-11. doi: 10.1111/1759-7714.14745. Epub 2022 Dec 8.
5
A case of endoscopic submucosal dissection for neuroendocrine carcinoma of the esophagus with invasion to the muscularis mucosae.一例内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗侵犯黏膜肌层的食管神经内分泌癌。
Clin J Gastroenterol. 2022 Apr;15(2):339-344. doi: 10.1007/s12328-022-01595-8. Epub 2022 Jan 24.
6
History of endoscopic diagnosis and treatment for esophageal and pharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma.食管和咽鳞状细胞癌的内镜诊断与治疗史
Dig Endosc. 2022 May;34 Suppl 2:23-26. doi: 10.1111/den.14062. Epub 2021 Jun 24.
7
Acetaldehyde breath test as a cancer risk marker in patients with esophageal and hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma.乙醛呼气试验作为食管和下咽鳞癌患者的癌症风险标志物。
PLoS One. 2021 May 19;16(5):e0251457. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251457. eCollection 2021.
8
Esophageal superficial adenosquamous carcinoma resected by endoscopic submucosal dissection: A rare case report.经内镜黏膜下剥离术切除的食管浅表腺鳞癌:一例罕见病例报告
World J Clin Cases. 2021 Feb 26;9(6):1336-1342. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i6.1336.
9
Association Between Waiting Time from Diagnosis to Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection and Non-curative Resection in Gastric Neoplasm.从诊断到内镜黏膜下剥离术的等待时间与胃肿瘤非治愈性切除的关系。
Anticancer Res. 2021 Jan;41(1):459-466. doi: 10.21873/anticanres.14796.
10
Guidelines for endoscopic submucosal dissection and endoscopic mucosal resection for early gastric cancer (second edition).早期胃癌内镜黏膜下剥离术和内镜黏膜切除术治疗指南(第二版)。
Dig Endosc. 2021 Jan;33(1):4-20. doi: 10.1111/den.13883. Epub 2020 Dec 9.