Zhang Jing, Rao Xin, Li Yiming, Zhu Yuan, Liu Fang, Guo Guangling, Luo Guoshi, Meng Zhongji, De Backer Daniel, Xiang Hui, Peng Zhiyong
Dept. of Critical Care Medicine, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430071, Hubei, China.
Clinical Research Center of Hubei Critical Care Medicine, Wuhan, 430071, Hubei, China.
Ann Intensive Care. 2021 Jan 9;11(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s13613-020-00792-3.
Few specific medications have been proven effective for the treatment of patients with severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Here, we tested whether high-dose vitamin C infusion was effective for severe COVID-19.
This randomized, controlled, clinical trial was performed at 3 hospitals in Hubei, China. Patients with confirmed severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection in the ICU were randomly assigned in as 1:1 ratio to either the high-dose intravenous vitamin C (HDIVC) or the placebo. HDIVC group received 12 g of vitamin C/50 ml every 12 h for 7 days at a rate of 12 ml/hour, and the placebo group received bacteriostatic water for injection in the same way within 48 h of arrival to ICU. The primary outcome was invasive mechanical ventilation-free days in 28 days (IMVFD28). Secondary outcomes were 28-day mortality, organ failure (Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score), and inflammation progression (interleukin-6).
Only 56 critical COVID-19 patients were ultimately recruited due to the early control of the outbreak. There was no difference in IMVFD28 between two groups (26.0 [9.0-28.0] in HDIVC vs 22.0 [8.50-28.0] in control, p = 0.57). HDIVC failed to reduce 28-day mortality (P = 0.27). During the 7-day treatment period, patients in the HDIVC group had a steady rise in the PaO/FiO (day 7: 229 vs. 151 mmHg, 95% CI 33 to 122, P = 0.01), which was not observed in the control group. IL-6 in the HDIVC group was lower than that in the control group (19.42 vs. 158.00; 95% CI -301.72 to -29.79; P = 0.04) on day 7.
This pilot trial showed that HDIVC failed to improve IMVFD28, but might show a potential signal of benefit in oxygenation for critically ill patients with COVID-19 improving PaO2/FiO2 even though.
很少有特定药物被证明对治疗重症2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)患者有效。在此,我们测试了大剂量静脉输注维生素C对重症COVID-19是否有效。
这项随机、对照临床试验在中国湖北的3家医院进行。重症监护病房(ICU)中确诊感染严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)的患者按1:1比例随机分为大剂量静脉维生素C(HDIVC)组或安慰剂组。HDIVC组每12小时接受12克维生素C/50毫升,共7天,输注速度为每小时12毫升,安慰剂组在进入ICU后48小时内以相同方式接受注射用抑菌水。主要结局是28天内无有创机械通气天数(IMVFD28)。次要结局包括28天死亡率、器官衰竭(序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分)和炎症进展(白细胞介素-6)。
由于疫情的早期控制,最终仅招募了56例重症COVID-19患者。两组之间的IMVFD28没有差异(HDIVC组为26.0[9.0 - 28.0],对照组为22.0[8.50 - 28.0],p = 0.57)。HDIVC未能降低28天死亡率(P = 0.27)。在7天的治疗期内,HDIVC组患者的PaO/FiO稳步上升(第7天:229对151 mmHg,95%CI 33至122,P = 0.01),而对照组未观察到这种情况。第7天,HDIVC组的白细胞介素-6低于对照组(19.42对158.00;95%CI -301.72至-29.79;P = 0.04)。
这项初步试验表明,HDIVC未能改善IMVFD28,但可能显示出对重症COVID-19患者氧合有益的潜在信号,即使它能改善PaO2 / FiO2。