Centre for Medicine and Society, Master Programme Global Urban Health, Albert-Ludwigs- University Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany.
Institute of Global Health, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
BMC Public Health. 2021 Jan 9;21(1):110. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-10126-4.
The rapid expansion of dengue, Zika and chikungunya with large scale outbreaks are an increasing public health concern in many countries. Additionally, the recent coronavirus pandemic urged the need to get connected for fast information transfer and exchange. As response, health programmes have -among other interventions- incorporated digital tools such as mobile phones for supporting the control and prevention of infectious diseases. However, little is known about the benefits of mobile phone technology in terms of input, process and outcome dimensions. The purpose of this scoping review is to analyse the evidence of the use of mobile phones as an intervention tool regarding the performance, acceptance, usability, feasibility, cost and effectiveness in dengue, Zika and chikungunya control programmes.
We conducted a scoping review of studies and reports by systematically searching: i) electronic databases (PubMed, PLOS ONE, PLOS Neglected Tropical Disease, LILACS, WHOLIS, ScienceDirect and Google scholar), ii) grey literature, using Google web and iii) documents in the list of references of the selected papers. Selected studies were categorized using a pre-determined data extraction form. Finally, a narrative summary of the evidence related to general characteristics of available mobile health tools and outcomes was produced.
The systematic literature search identified 1289 records, 32 of which met the inclusion criteria and 4 records from the reference lists. A total of 36 studies were included coming from twenty different countries. Five mobile phone services were identified in this review: mobile applications (n = 18), short message services (n=7), camera phone (n = 6), mobile phone tracking data (n = 4), and simple mobile communication (n = 1). Mobile phones were used for surveillance, prevention, diagnosis, and communication demonstrating good performance, acceptance and usability by users, as well as feasibility of mobile phone under real life conditions and effectiveness in terms of contributing to a reduction of vectors/ disease and improving users-oriented behaviour changes. It can be concluded that there are benefits for using mobile phones in the fight against arboviral diseases as well as other epidemic diseases. Further studies particularly on acceptance, cost and effectiveness at scale are recommended.
登革热、寨卡和基孔肯雅热的迅速蔓延和大规模爆发,是许多国家日益关注的公共卫生问题。此外,最近的冠状病毒大流行促使人们需要进行快速信息传递和交流。作为应对措施,卫生规划除其他干预措施外,还采用了手机等数字工具,以支持控制和预防传染病。然而,对于手机技术在投入、过程和结果方面的益处,人们知之甚少。本范围综述的目的是分析手机作为干预工具在登革热、寨卡和基孔肯雅热控制规划中在绩效、接受度、可用性、可行性、成本和效果方面的使用证据。
我们通过系统搜索电子数据库(PubMed、PLOS ONE、PLOS 被忽视热带病、LILACS、WHOLIS、ScienceDirect 和 Google Scholar)、灰色文献(使用 Google 网络)和选定论文参考文献列表中的文件,对研究和报告进行了范围综述。使用预先确定的数据提取表对选定的研究进行分类。最后,根据现有的移动健康工具的一般特征和结果,制作了相关证据的叙述性总结。
系统文献搜索共确定了 1289 条记录,其中 32 条符合纳入标准,还有 4 条记录来自参考文献列表。共有 36 项研究符合纳入标准,来自 20 个不同的国家。本综述确定了 5 种移动电话服务:移动应用程序(n = 18)、短消息服务(n = 7)、摄像手机(n = 6)、移动电话追踪数据(n = 4)和简单移动通讯(n = 1)。移动电话被用于监测、预防、诊断和通讯,用户对其性能、接受度和可用性、现实生活条件下移动电话的可行性以及在减少病媒/疾病和改善以用户为导向的行为改变方面的有效性均给予好评。可以得出结论,在防治虫媒病毒病和其他传染病方面,使用移动电话具有一定益处。建议进一步开展关于接受度、成本和大规模有效性的研究。