Suppr超能文献

一项比较经宫颈与经腹绒毛取样(CVS)的研究。

A study comparing transcervical with transabdominal chorionic villus sampling (CVS).

作者信息

Mackenzie W E, Holmes D S, Newton J R

机构信息

Academic Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Birmingham Maternity Hospital, Edgbaston.

出版信息

Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1988 Jan;95(1):75-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1988.tb06483.x.

Abstract

Chorionic villus sampling (CVS) was performed in 50 anaesthetized patients before therapeutic abortion by the transabdominal route and then by the transcervical route. The two methods of villus sampling were equally successful in obtaining villi but the transcervical method was significantly better at obtaining chorionic villi greater than 10 mg in weight (chi 2 13.92 P less than 0.001). Placental position did not affect villus recovery with either sampling method.

摘要

对50例接受麻醉的患者,在治疗性流产前经腹途径然后经宫颈途径进行绒毛取样。两种绒毛取样方法在获取绒毛方面同样成功,但经宫颈方法在获取重量超过10毫克的绒毛方面明显更好(卡方值13.92,P小于0.001)。两种取样方法中,胎盘位置均不影响绒毛回收。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验