BACKGROUND

Although operative indications for traumatic brain injury (TBI) are known, neurosurgeons are unsure whether to remove the bone flap after mass lesion extraction, and an efficient scoring system for predicting which patients should undergo decompressive craniectomy (DC) does not exist.

METHODS

Nine parameters were assessed. In total, 245 patients with severe TBI were retrospectively assessed from June 2015 to May 2019, who underwent DC or craniotomy to remove mass lesions. The 6-month mortality and Extended Glasgow Outcome Scale scores were compared between the DC and craniotomy groups. Using univariable and multivariable logistic regression equations, receiver operating characteristic curves were obtained for predicting the decision for DC.

RESULTS

The overall 6-month mortality in the entire cohort was 11.43% (28/245). Patients undergoing DC had lower mean preoperative Glasgow Coma Scale scores (P = 0.01), and higher amounts of individuals with a Glasgow Coma Scale score of 6 (P = 0.007), unresponsive pupillary light reflex (P < 0.001), closed basal cisterns (P < 0.001), and diffuse injury (P = 0.025), compared with the craniotomy group. Because of high disease severity, individuals administered primary DC showed increased 6-month mortality compared with the craniotomy group. However, in surviving patients, favorable Extended Glasgow Outcome Scale rates were similar in both groups. Pupillary light reflex and basal cisterns were independent predictors of the DC decision. Based on receiver operating characteristic curves, the model had sensitivity and specificity of 81.6% and 84.9%, respectively, in predicting the probability of DC.

CONCLUSIONS

These preliminary data showed that primary DC may benefit some patients with severe TBI with mass lesions. In addition, unresponsive preoperative pupil reaction and closed basal cistern could predict the DC decision.