• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Identifying barriers and considerations for cochlear implantation in Amish children.确定在阿米什儿童中进行人工耳蜗植入的障碍和考虑因素。
Am J Otolaryngol. 2021 Mar-Apr;42(2):102887. doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2020.102887. Epub 2021 Jan 5.
2
Barriers to early pediatric cochlear implantation.小儿早期人工耳蜗植入的障碍。
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2013 Nov;77(11):1869-72. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2013.08.031. Epub 2013 Sep 5.
3
Impact of Universal Newborn Hearing Screening on cochlear implanted children in Ireland.普遍新生儿听力筛查对爱尔兰接受人工耳蜗植入儿童的影响。
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2020 Jun;133:109975. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2020.109975. Epub 2020 Feb 27.
4
Perceptions of pediatric primary care physicians on congenital hearing loss and cochlear implantation.儿科初级保健医生对先天性听力损失及人工耳蜗植入的看法。
J Miss State Med Assoc. 2006 Feb;47(2):35-41.
5
Comprehensive hearing care network for early identification and intervention in children with congenital and late-onset/acquired hearing loss: 8 years' experience in Miyazaki.用于先天性及迟发性/获得性听力损失儿童早期识别与干预的综合听力保健网络:宫崎县8年经验
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2020 Apr;131:109881. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2020.109881. Epub 2020 Jan 16.
6
Lack of financial barriers to pediatric cochlear implantation: impact of socioeconomic status on access and outcomes.儿童人工耳蜗植入不存在经济障碍:社会经济地位对可及性和治疗效果的影响
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2010 Jul;136(7):648-57. doi: 10.1001/archoto.2010.90.
7
Cochlear implantation in unique pediatric populations.特殊儿科人群的人工耳蜗植入
Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012 Dec;20(6):507-17. doi: 10.1097/MOO.0b013e328359eea4.
8
Pediatric Cochlear Implantation: Why Do Children Receive Implants Late?小儿人工耳蜗植入:为何儿童延迟接受植入手术?
Ear Hear. 2015 Nov-Dec;36(6):688-94. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000184.
9
Cochlear implantation in pediatrics: Impact of newborn hearing screening on intervention time.儿科中的耳蜗植入:新生儿听力筛查对干预时间的影响。
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2024 Jun;181:111990. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2024.111990. Epub 2024 May 23.
10
Exploring factors that affect the age of cochlear implantation in children.探索影响儿童人工耳蜗植入年龄的因素。
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2011 Sep;75(9):1082-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2011.05.018. Epub 2011 Jun 23.

本文引用的文献

1
Injuries among Amish children: opportunities for prevention.阿米什儿童的伤害:预防机会
Inj Epidemiol. 2019 Dec 17;6:49. doi: 10.1186/s40621-019-0223-x. eCollection 2019.
2
Language development in the pediatric cochlear implant patient.小儿人工耳蜗植入患者的语言发展
Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2018 Apr 19;3(3):209-213. doi: 10.1002/lio2.156. eCollection 2018 Jun.
3
Barriers to Rehabilitation Care in Pediatric Cochlear Implant Recipients.儿科人工耳蜗植入受者康复护理障碍。
Otol Neurotol. 2018 Jun;39(5):e307-e313. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000001777.
4
Caring for the Amish: What Every Anesthesiologist Should Know.关爱阿米什人:每位麻醉医师都应了解的知识。
Anesth Analg. 2017 May;124(5):1520-1528. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001808.
5
Barriers to early pediatric cochlear implantation.小儿早期人工耳蜗植入的障碍。
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2013 Nov;77(11):1869-72. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2013.08.031. Epub 2013 Sep 5.
6
Health literacy among the Amish: measuring a complex concept among a unique population.美国亚米希人健康素养:在一个独特群体中测量一个复杂概念。
J Community Health. 2013 Aug;38(4):753-8. doi: 10.1007/s10900-013-9675-z.
7
Living the good life? Mortality and hospital utilization patterns in the Old Order Amish.过着美好的生活?老派阿米什人的死亡率和医院利用模式。
PLoS One. 2012;7(12):e51560. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0051560. Epub 2012 Dec 19.
8
Unique aspects of nursing care for Amish children.
MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs. 2001 Jul-Aug;26(4):192-6. doi: 10.1097/00005721-200107000-00008.

确定在阿米什儿童中进行人工耳蜗植入的障碍和考虑因素。

Identifying barriers and considerations for cochlear implantation in Amish children.

机构信息

UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, Department of Otolaryngology, Pittsburgh, PA, United States of America.

UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, Department of Otolaryngology, Pittsburgh, PA, United States of America.

出版信息

Am J Otolaryngol. 2021 Mar-Apr;42(2):102887. doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2020.102887. Epub 2021 Jan 5.

DOI:10.1016/j.amjoto.2020.102887
PMID:33422945
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7914208/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine if barriers to cochlear implantation (CI) exist with respect to Amish children and to describe unique considerations associated with CI and subsequent otologic care in the Amish population.

METHODS

Out of all patients who underwent CI at a tertiary care pediatric hospital from 2008 to 2019, Amish children were age-matched to the remainder of the cohort to compare demographics and care-related metrics including etiology of hearing loss, age at time of initial hearing-related appointment and at CI, total number of pre- and post-operative audiologic and otologic appointments, and post-operative complications. Social considerations that may pose barriers to care were collected for descriptive analysis.

RESULTS

Since 2008, 232 children underwent CI, of which 8 implants were performed on Amish children. Six (75%) Amish children underwent newborn hearing screening and 3(38%) were found to have syndromic etiology for hearing loss. While Amish patients had a lower number of both audiologic (15 vs 33.5, p<.001) and otologic (4.5 vs 8.5, p=.028) appointments when compared to age-matched controls, median age at the time of implantation for the whole sample was not different between groups (2.5 vs 2.0 years, p=.211). From a social standpoint, limitations in transportation, telephone communication, and ability to recharge processor batteries must be considered in the Amish population.

CONCLUSION

Amish children undergoing CI face unique barriers to care including transportation and technologic limitations, leading to overall fewer hearing-related appointments when compared to an age-matched cohort. Understanding societal differences is important to facilitate optimal care for Amish children with hearing loss.

摘要

目的

确定在阿米什儿童中是否存在与人工耳蜗植入(CI)相关的障碍,并描述与 CI 相关的独特考虑因素以及在阿米什人群中的后续耳科护理。

方法

在 2008 年至 2019 年期间,在一家三级儿科医院接受 CI 的所有患者中,与其余队列的年龄相匹配,以比较人口统计学和护理相关指标,包括听力损失的病因、初次听力相关预约和 CI 的年龄、术前和术后听力和耳科预约的总次数,以及术后并发症。收集了可能对护理构成障碍的社会因素进行描述性分析。

结果

自 2008 年以来,共有 232 名儿童接受了 CI,其中 8 名植入物是在阿米什儿童中进行的。6 名(75%)阿米什儿童接受了新生儿听力筛查,其中 3 名(38%)患有听力损失的综合征病因。虽然与年龄匹配的对照组相比,阿米什患者的听力(15 次与 33.5 次,p<.001)和耳科(4.5 次与 8.5 次,p=.028)预约次数较少,但两组在整个样本中的植入年龄中位数没有差异(2.5 岁与 2.0 岁,p=.211)。从社会角度来看,在阿米什人群中,必须考虑交通、电话沟通和处理器电池充电能力的限制。

结论

接受 CI 的阿米什儿童面临着独特的护理障碍,包括交通和技术限制,与年龄匹配的队列相比,他们的听力相关预约次数总体较少。了解社会差异对于为听力损失的阿米什儿童提供最佳护理非常重要。