• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

“骨折部位直径与股骨干峡部直径比”作为顺行髓内钉治疗股骨干下 1/3 骨折并发症的预测指标。

"Ratio of fracture site diameter to isthmus femoral canal diameter" as a predictor of complication following treatment of infra-isthmal femoral shaft fracture with antegrade intramedullary nailing.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology; Taipei Veterans General Hospital Yuanshan Branch, Taiwan, ROC; Department of Orthopaedics; School of Medicine; National Yang-Ming University, Taiwan, ROC.

Division of Medical Imaging for Health Management, Cheng-Hsin General Hospital, Taiwan, ROC; Department of Radiology; School of Medicine; National Yang-Ming University, Taiwan, ROC.

出版信息

Injury. 2021 Apr;52(4):961-966. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2020.12.034. Epub 2021 Jan 2.

DOI:10.1016/j.injury.2020.12.034
PMID:33423768
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Fixation of infra-isthmus femoral shaft fracture using antegrade intramedullary (IM) nailing is difficult and is associated with a high complication rate. This study aimed to identify risk factors for complications following this procedure. The ratio of the fracture site diameter to the diameter of the femoral intramedullary canal of the isthmus (FI ratio) was evaluated as a novel parameter to predict complication.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients who underwent antegrade IM nailing for infra-isthmus femoral shaft fracture between January 2008 and December 2018 and had a minimum of 12 months of follow-up were retrospectively reviewed. The primary outcome was occurrence of complication, including non-union, mal-alignment, fixation failure, or progressive loss of reduction. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify risk factors of complication. The sensitivity and specificity of FI ratio as a predictor of complication was calculated. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was generated to establish an FI ratio threshold to predict occurrence of complication following antegrade IM nailing.

RESULTS

Sixty-five patients with a mean age of 47.1 years were included. Using univariate logistic regression analysis, comminuted fracture pattern (p=0.026), distance from screws to fracture site (< 3cm) (p=0.002), and higher FI ratio (p=0.001) were associated with complication. Using multivariate logistic regression analysis, FI ratio was identified as an independent risk factor for complication following antegrade IM nailing (p=0.038). ROC curve indicated that FI ratio ≥ 2 had sensitivity and specificity of 0.72 and 0.72, respectively, in predicting complication.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study indicates that wider intramedullary diameter at the fracture site was associated with higher complication rate following antegrade IM nailing in distal infra-isthmal femoral fractures. The FI ratio could be a reliable predictor of complication after antegrade IM nailing for such fracture, and alternative strategies should be considered for patients with higher FI ratio (≥ 2).

摘要

简介

经股骨前骨干内固定治疗股骨下 1/3 骨干骨折难度较大,并发症发生率较高。本研究旨在确定该术式相关并发症的危险因素。本研究评估了股骨峡部髓腔(FI)处骨折部位直径与髓腔直径的比值(FI 比值)作为预测并发症的新参数。

材料与方法

回顾性分析 2008 年 1 月至 2018 年 12 月期间接受经股骨前骨干内固定治疗的股骨下 1/3 骨干骨折患者,随访时间至少 12 个月。主要结局为并发症的发生,包括不愈合、对线不良、固定失败或复位丢失。采用 Logistic 回归分析确定并发症的危险因素。计算 FI 比值作为并发症预测指标的灵敏度和特异性。绘制受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线,确定 FI 比值预测经股骨前骨干内固定治疗后并发症发生的阈值。

结果

共纳入 65 例患者,平均年龄 47.1 岁。单因素 Logistic 回归分析显示,粉碎性骨折类型(p=0.026)、螺钉至骨折部位的距离(<3cm)(p=0.002)和较高的 FI 比值(p=0.001)与并发症相关。多因素 Logistic 回归分析表明,FI 比值是经股骨前骨干内固定治疗后发生并发症的独立危险因素(p=0.038)。ROC 曲线表明,FI 比值≥2 预测并发症的灵敏度和特异性分别为 0.72 和 0.72。

结论

本研究表明,股骨峡部骨折部位髓腔直径较大与经股骨前骨干内固定治疗股骨下 1/3 骨干骨折并发症发生率较高相关。FI 比值可作为预测此类骨折经股骨前骨干内固定治疗后并发症的可靠指标,对于 FI 比值较高(≥2)的患者应考虑采用其他治疗策略。

相似文献

1
"Ratio of fracture site diameter to isthmus femoral canal diameter" as a predictor of complication following treatment of infra-isthmal femoral shaft fracture with antegrade intramedullary nailing.“骨折部位直径与股骨干峡部直径比”作为顺行髓内钉治疗股骨干下 1/3 骨折并发症的预测指标。
Injury. 2021 Apr;52(4):961-966. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2020.12.034. Epub 2021 Jan 2.
2
Treatment of infra-isthmal femoral fracture with an intramedullary nail: Is retrograde nailing a better option than antegrade nailing?使用髓内钉治疗峡部以下股骨骨折:逆行交锁髓内钉固定是否优于顺行交锁髓内钉固定?
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2018 Sep;138(9):1241-1247. doi: 10.1007/s00402-018-2961-6. Epub 2018 May 24.
3
Perioperative Radiographic Predictors of Non-Union in Infra-Isthmal Femoral Shaft Fractures after Antegrade Intramedullary Nailing: A Case-Control Study.顺行髓内钉固定术后股骨干峡部以下骨折不愈合的围手术期影像学预测因素:一项病例对照研究
J Clin Med. 2022 Jun 24;11(13):3664. doi: 10.3390/jcm11133664.
4
Critical analysis of the ratio of fracture site diameter to the isthmus femoral canal diameter as a potential predictor of complications following antegrade intramedullary nailing for the distal femur shaft fractures.
Injury. 2022 Jul;53(7):2682. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2021.03.035. Epub 2021 Mar 25.
5
The characteristics and influence of iatrogenic fracture comminution following antegrade interlocking nailing for simple femoral shaft fractures, a retrospective cohort study.顺行交锁髓内钉治疗单纯股骨干骨折所致医源性骨折粉碎的特点及影响:一项回顾性队列研究。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022 May 14;23(1):456. doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05418-2.
6
Comparison of knee function in patients with a healed fracture of the femoral shaft fixed with retrograde and antegrade intramedullary nailing.逆行与顺行髓内钉固定治疗股骨干骨折愈合患者的膝关节功能比较。
Ortop Traumatol Rehabil. 2013 Oct 31;15(5):395-405. doi: 10.5604/15093492.1084241.
7
Authors' reply to concerns regarding "Critical analysis of the ratio of fracture site diameter to the isthmus femoral canal diameter as a potential predictor of complications following antegrade intramedullary nailing for the distal femur shaft fractures".作者对关于“股骨远端骨干骨折顺行髓内钉固定术后并发症潜在预测指标——骨折部位直径与股骨髓腔峡部直径之比的批判性分析”相关问题的回复
Injury. 2022 Oct;53(10):3561. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2022.05.047. Epub 2022 Jun 8.
8
Retrograde versus antegrade nailing of femoral shaft fractures.股骨干骨折的逆行与顺行髓内钉固定
J Orthop Trauma. 2001 Mar-Apr;15(3):161-9. doi: 10.1097/00005131-200103000-00003.
9
Infra-isthmal fracture is a risk factor for nonunion after femoral nailing: a case-control study.峡部下骨折是股骨钉固定术后骨不连的一个危险因素:一项病例对照研究。
J Orthop Sci. 2013 Jan;18(1):76-80. doi: 10.1007/s00776-012-0316-7. Epub 2012 Oct 11.
10
Augmentation plating leaving the nail in situ is an excellent option for treating femoral shaft nonunion after IM nailing: a multicentre study.原位保留髓内钉的钢板增强术是治疗髓内钉固定术后股骨干骨不连的极佳选择:一项多中心研究。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2021 Dec;47(6):1895-1901. doi: 10.1007/s00068-020-01333-0. Epub 2020 Feb 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing the Importance of Anteromedial Cortical Support in Fixing Pertrochanteric Fractures: A Comprehensive Study.评估转子间骨折固定中内侧皮质支撑的重要性:一项综合研究。
J Orthop Case Rep. 2025 Jul;15(7):255-261. doi: 10.13107/jocr.2025.v15.i07.5842.
2
Comparison of preoperative radiographic measurements for femoral shaft fractures: a study on canal diameter measurement methods.股骨干骨折术前影像学测量的比较:一项关于髓腔直径测量方法的研究
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2025 Mar 18;35(1):122. doi: 10.1007/s00590-025-04246-z.
3
Locked intramedullary nailing of diaphyseal femur fractures without intraoperative fluoroscopy, fracture table and power reaming: retrograde affords greater procedural efficiency than antegrade approach.
不使用术中透视、骨折复位台和动力扩髓,经皮顺行交锁髓内钉内固定治疗股骨干骨折:逆行入路比顺行入路具有更高的手术效率。
Int Orthop. 2023 Jul;47(7):1845-1853. doi: 10.1007/s00264-023-05832-8. Epub 2023 May 4.
4
Perioperative Radiographic Predictors of Non-Union in Infra-Isthmal Femoral Shaft Fractures after Antegrade Intramedullary Nailing: A Case-Control Study.顺行髓内钉固定术后股骨干峡部以下骨折不愈合的围手术期影像学预测因素:一项病例对照研究
J Clin Med. 2022 Jun 24;11(13):3664. doi: 10.3390/jcm11133664.
5
The characteristics and influence of iatrogenic fracture comminution following antegrade interlocking nailing for simple femoral shaft fractures, a retrospective cohort study.顺行交锁髓内钉治疗单纯股骨干骨折所致医源性骨折粉碎的特点及影响:一项回顾性队列研究。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022 May 14;23(1):456. doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05418-2.