Latkin Carl A, Dayton Lauren, Moran Meghan, Strickland Justin C, Collins Karina
Department of Health, Behavior and Society, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD USA.
Behavioral Pharmacology Research Unit, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD USA.
Curr Psychol. 2022;41(11):7918-7926. doi: 10.1007/s12144-020-01211-3. Epub 2021 Jan 6.
COVID-19 skepticism can be conceptualized as the denial of the seriousness of the illness and the perception that the pandemic is overblown or a hoax. In the current study, we examined the association between COVID-19 skepticism and frequency of engaging in COVID-19 prevention behaviors, political ideology, social norms about distancing, COVID-19 information-seeking behaviors, and COVID-19 conspiracy theories. A survey was administered from May 5th-14th. At that time, there were over 1 million COVID-19 cases in the US. Participants were recruited online through MTurk. The three outcome variables were handwashing, mask wearing, and social distancing. Injunctive and descriptive norms were assessed as well as measures of perceived risk to self and others. There were 683 participants in the analyses. In the multiple logistic regression model, those who were of younger age (aOR = 0.97, < 0.05), better health (aOR = 0.56, < 0.01), and more politically conservative (aOR = 1.32, p < 0.01) were more likely to endorse COVID-19 skepticism statements. People who reported higher Skepticism were also less likely to that believe people close to them would die from COVID-19 (aOR = 4.2, < 0.01), engage in COVID-19 prevention behaviors, including spending time inside to prevent coronavirus (aOR = 0.33, < 0.01) and frequently wear a mask outside (aOR = 0.44, p < 0.01). Those who were more skeptical about COVID-19 were also more likely to believe the conspiracy theory that China purposefully spread the virus (aOR = 6.38 < 0.01). COVID-19 Skepticism was strongly associated with reduced engagement in COVID-19 prevention behaviors. These findings bolster the arguments for making these public health recommendations mandatory.
对新冠疫情的怀疑态度可被理解为对该疾病严重性的否认,以及认为这场大流行被夸大或只是一场骗局。在当前的研究中,我们考察了对新冠疫情的怀疑态度与采取新冠疫情预防行为的频率、政治意识形态、社交距离的社会规范、新冠疫情信息寻求行为以及新冠疫情阴谋论之间的关联。5月5日至14日进行了一项调查。当时,美国有超过100万例新冠病例。参与者通过亚马逊土耳其机器人在线招募。三个结果变量是洗手、戴口罩和保持社交距离。评估了指令性规范和描述性规范以及对自身和他人的感知风险度量。分析中有683名参与者。在多元逻辑回归模型中,年龄较小(调整后比值比[aOR]=0.97,p<0.05)、健康状况较好(aOR=0.56,p<0.01)以及政治上更保守(aOR=1.32,p<0.01)的人更有可能认可对新冠疫情的怀疑性陈述。报告怀疑程度较高的人也不太可能相信身边的人会死于新冠疫情(aOR=4.2,p<0.01),采取新冠疫情预防行为,包括待在室内以预防冠状病毒(aOR=0.33,p<0.01)以及经常在户外戴口罩(aOR=0.44,p<0.01)。那些对新冠疫情更持怀疑态度的人也更有可能相信中国故意传播病毒的阴谋论(aOR=6.38,p<0.01)。对新冠疫情的怀疑态度与减少采取新冠疫情预防行为密切相关。这些发现支持了将这些公共卫生建议强制实施的观点。