Suppr超能文献

气候变化态度与新冠疫情态度之间的关联:这种联系不止于政治意识形态。

The association between climate change attitudes and COVID-19 attitudes: The link is more than political ideology.

作者信息

Latkin Carl, Dayton Lauren, Coyle Catelyn, Yi Grace, Winiker Abigail, German Danielle

机构信息

Department of Health, Behavior and Society, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University.

Division of Infectious Diseases, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine.

出版信息

J Clim Chang Health. 2022 Feb;5:100099. doi: 10.1016/j.joclim.2021.100099. Epub 2021 Nov 8.

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic and climate change are two current global threats. This study examined the relationship between climate change attitudes and COVID-19 behaviors and risk perceptions. Drivers of climate change attitudes and COVID-19 behaviors were also assessed. Study participants were an online sample of 520 respondents from a longitudinal study of COVID-19 and well-being in the US. Logistic regression models were used to examine the outcomes of climate change opinions and COVID-19 perceptions and prevention behaviors (perceived COVID-19 risk, mask wearing, social distancing, and vaccine intentions). Covariates included political ideology, conspiracy beliefs, and trust in scientific information about COVID-19. In the multivariable models of COVID-19 perceptions and prevention behaviors, climate change opinions were also included as a covariate. In these models, climate change attitudes were significantly associated with perceived risk of COVID-19, always wearing masks, decreased time spent with others due to COVID-19, and intention to get a COVID-19 vaccine. In adjusted models, the odds of wearing a mask increased 41% (CI: 1.11-1.78) for every 1-point increase on the climate attitude scale and decreased 13% (CI: 0.79-0.96) if the participant distrusted COVID-19 information. Those who reported distrust of COVID-19 information (aOR: 1.61, CI: 1.40-1.85), politically conservative ideology (aOR: 1.24, CI: 1.04-1.47), lower concern about climate change (aOR: 0.71, CI: 0.53-0.97), female sex (aOR: 2.39 CI: 1.38-4.13), and lower disbelief in conspiracy theories (aOR: 0.63, CI: 0.51-0.80) had higher odds of not intending to be vaccinated. These findings suggest that climate change attitudes are linked to COVID-19 behaviors and perceptions, which are not completely driven by political ideology or trust in scientific information.

摘要

新冠疫情和气候变化是当前全球面临的两大威胁。本研究考察了气候变化态度与新冠行为及风险认知之间的关系。同时也评估了气候变化态度和新冠行为的驱动因素。研究参与者是来自美国一项关于新冠疫情与幸福感的纵向研究的520名在线受访者样本。使用逻辑回归模型来检验气候变化观点、新冠认知及预防行为(感知到的新冠风险、佩戴口罩、保持社交距离和接种疫苗意愿)的结果。协变量包括政治意识形态、阴谋论信念以及对新冠科学信息的信任度。在新冠认知与预防行为的多变量模型中,气候变化观点也作为协变量纳入。在这些模型中,气候变化态度与感知到的新冠风险、始终佩戴口罩、因新冠疫情减少与他人相处时间以及接种新冠疫苗的意愿显著相关。在调整后的模型中,气候态度量表每增加1分,佩戴口罩的几率增加41%(置信区间:1.11 - 1.78),而如果参与者不信任新冠信息,佩戴口罩的几率则降低13%(置信区间:0.79 - 0.96)。那些表示不信任新冠信息的人(调整后比值比:1.61,置信区间:1.40 - 1.85)、政治上保守的意识形态(调整后比值比:1.24,置信区间:1.04 - 1.47)、对气候变化关注度较低的人(调整后比值比:0.71,置信区间:0.53 - 0.97)、女性(调整后比值比:2.39,置信区间:1.38 - 4.13)以及对阴谋论怀疑度较低的人(调整后比值比:0.63,置信区间:0.51 - 0.80)不打算接种疫苗的几率更高。这些发现表明,气候变化态度与新冠行为及认知相关,而这并非完全由政治意识形态或对科学信息的信任所驱动。

相似文献

1
The association between climate change attitudes and COVID-19 attitudes: The link is more than political ideology.
J Clim Chang Health. 2022 Feb;5:100099. doi: 10.1016/j.joclim.2021.100099. Epub 2021 Nov 8.
2
Conspiracy theories as barriers to controlling the spread of COVID-19 in the U.S.
Soc Sci Med. 2020 Oct;263:113356. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113356. Epub 2020 Sep 21.
4
Factors Associated With the Intention to Receive the COVID-19 Vaccine: Cross-sectional National Study.
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2022 Nov 14;8(11):e37203. doi: 10.2196/37203.
5
Mask usage, social distancing, racial, and gender correlates of COVID-19 vaccine intentions among adults in the US.
PLoS One. 2021 Feb 16;16(2):e0246970. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246970. eCollection 2021.
6
Behavioral and psychosocial factors associated with COVID-19 skepticism in the United States.
Curr Psychol. 2022;41(11):7918-7926. doi: 10.1007/s12144-020-01211-3. Epub 2021 Jan 6.
8
Trusted information sources in the early months of the COVID-19 pandemic predict vaccination uptake over one year later.
Vaccine. 2023 Jan 9;41(2):573-580. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.11.076. Epub 2022 Dec 6.
9
Vaccine Attitudes Mediate Relationships Between Caregiver Political Ideology and Likelihood of Child Vaccination for COVID-19.
Matern Child Health J. 2023 Jun;27(6):984-990. doi: 10.1007/s10995-023-03642-3. Epub 2023 Mar 30.
10
Correlates of belief in climate change: Demographics, ideology and belief systems.
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2022 Oct;230:103775. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2022.103775. Epub 2022 Oct 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Conspiracy narratives and vaccine hesitancy: a scoping review of prevalence, impact, and interventions.
BMC Public Health. 2024 Nov 29;24(1):3325. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-20797-y.
4
Making waves in resilience: Drawing lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic for advancing sustainable development.
Curr Res Environ Sustain. 2022;4:100171. doi: 10.1016/j.crsust.2022.100171. Epub 2022 Jun 13.
5
Political beliefs and the acceptance of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic restrictions. The case of Poland.
PLoS One. 2022 Mar 1;17(3):e0264502. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0264502. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

2
Associations Between Governor Political Affiliation and COVID-19 Cases, Deaths, and Testing in the U.S.
Am J Prev Med. 2021 Jul;61(1):115-119. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2021.01.034. Epub 2021 Mar 10.
3
Social mobilization and polarization can create volatility in COVID-19 pandemic control.
Appl Netw Sci. 2021;6(1):11. doi: 10.1007/s41109-021-00356-9. Epub 2021 Feb 11.
4
The 2020 report of The Lancet Countdown on health and climate change: responding to converging crises.
Lancet. 2021 Jan 9;397(10269):129-170. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32290-X. Epub 2020 Dec 2.
5
Affective polarization, local contexts and public opinion in America.
Nat Hum Behav. 2021 Jan;5(1):28-38. doi: 10.1038/s41562-020-01012-5. Epub 2020 Nov 23.
6
Political polarization in US residents' COVID-19 risk perceptions, policy preferences, and protective behaviors.
J Risk Uncertain. 2020;61(2):177-194. doi: 10.1007/s11166-020-09336-3. Epub 2020 Nov 18.
7
Partisan differences in physical distancing are linked to health outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Nat Hum Behav. 2020 Nov;4(11):1186-1197. doi: 10.1038/s41562-020-00977-7. Epub 2020 Nov 2.
8
Media trust and infection mitigating behaviours during the COVID-19 pandemic in the USA.
BMJ Glob Health. 2020 Oct;5(10). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-003323.
9
How Trump damaged science - and why it could take decades to recover.
Nature. 2020 Oct;586(7828):190-194. doi: 10.1038/d41586-020-02800-9.
10
Conspiracy theories as barriers to controlling the spread of COVID-19 in the U.S.
Soc Sci Med. 2020 Oct;263:113356. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113356. Epub 2020 Sep 21.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验