• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

为什么他们无法访问?临床信息获取的用户障碍。

Why are they not accessing it? User barriers to clinical information access.

出版信息

J Med Libr Assoc. 2021 Jan 1;109(1):126-132. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2021.1051.

DOI:10.5195/jmla.2021.1051
PMID:33424474
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7772983/
Abstract

The Medical Library Association's InSight Initiative provides an open and collaborative environment for library and industry partners to discuss vexing problems and find solutions to better serve their users. The initiative's fifth summit, continuing work from the previous summit, focused on understanding how users discover and access information in the clinical environment. During the summit, participants were divided into working groups and encouraged to create a tangible product as a result of their discussions. At the end of the summit, participants established a framework for understanding users' pain points, discussed possible solutions to those points, and received feedback on their work from an End User Advisory Board comprising physicians, clinical researchers, and clinical faculty in biomedicine. In addition to the pain point framework, participants are developing MLA InSight Initiative Learning content with modules to educate librarians and publishers about critical aspects of user behavior. The 2020 Insight Initiative Fall Forum will serve as a virtual home for constructive dialogue between health sciences librarians and publishers on improving discovery and access to information.

摘要

医学图书馆协会的洞察倡议为图书馆和行业合作伙伴提供了一个开放和协作的环境,以便讨论令人困扰的问题并找到解决方案,从而更好地为用户服务。该倡议的第五次峰会延续了前一次峰会的工作,重点关注了解用户如何在临床环境中发现和获取信息。在峰会上,参与者被分成工作组,并鼓励他们根据讨论结果创建一个有形的产品。峰会结束时,参与者为了解用户的痛点建立了一个框架,讨论了这些痛点的可能解决方案,并从由医生、临床研究人员和生物医学临床教师组成的最终用户咨询委员会获得了对其工作的反馈。除了痛点框架外,参与者还在开发 MLA 洞察倡议学习内容,其中包括有关用户行为关键方面的模块,以教育图书馆员和出版商。2020 年洞察倡议秋季论坛将成为健康科学图书馆员和出版商之间关于改善信息发现和获取的建设性对话的虚拟家园。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e25e/7772983/fff6d29c6f0f/jmla-109-1-126-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e25e/7772983/fff6d29c6f0f/jmla-109-1-126-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e25e/7772983/fff6d29c6f0f/jmla-109-1-126-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Why are they not accessing it? User barriers to clinical information access.为什么他们无法访问?临床信息获取的用户障碍。
J Med Libr Assoc. 2021 Jan 1;109(1):126-132. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2021.1051.
2
Report from the Medical Library Association's InSight Initiative Summit 3: Bridge Building: What Bridges to Build and How.来自医学图书馆协会洞察计划峰会 3 的报告:构建桥梁:构建哪些桥梁以及如何构建。
J Med Libr Assoc. 2020 Apr;108(2):321-333. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2020.894. Epub 2020 Apr 1.
3
Report from the Medical Library Association's InSight Initiative Summit 2: Meeting the Evolving Information Needs of Library Stakeholders.来自医学图书馆协会洞察计划峰会 2 的报告:满足图书馆利益相关者不断变化的信息需求。
J Med Libr Assoc. 2019 Apr;107(2):137-150. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2019.669. Epub 2019 Apr 1.
4
Report from the Medical Library Association's InSight Initiative Summit 1: Engaging Users in a Disruptive Era.医学图书馆协会洞察计划峰会1报告:在颠覆性时代吸引用户
J Med Libr Assoc. 2018 Oct;106(4):554-572. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2018.561. Epub 2018 Oct 1.
5
The "Data Visualization Clinic": a library-led critique workshop for data visualization.“数据可视化诊所”:一个由图书馆主导的数据可视化批判研讨会。
J Med Libr Assoc. 2018 Oct;106(4):477-482. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2018.333. Epub 2018 Oct 1.
6
Complementary competencies: public health and health sciences librarianship.互补能力:公共卫生与健康科学图书馆学
J Med Libr Assoc. 2005 Jul;93(3):338-47.
7
Changing the face of reference: adapting biomedical and health information services for the classroom, clinic, and beyond.改变参考文献的面貌:使生物医学与健康信息服务适用于课堂、诊所及其他场所。
Med Ref Serv Q. 2012;31(3):280-301. doi: 10.1080/02763869.2012.698172.
8
Widening panoramas: current status and future prospects.广阔前景:现状与未来展望
Health Info Libr J. 2008 Dec;25 Suppl 1:86-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-1842.2008.00814.x.
9
The Librarian's Contribution to Continuing Medical Education.图书馆员对继续医学教育的贡献。
Med Ref Serv Q. 2017 Oct-Dec;36(4):408-414. doi: 10.1080/02763869.2017.1369291.
10
Awareness, adoption, and application of the Association of College & Research Libraries (ACRL) Framework for Information Literacy in health sciences libraries.高校与研究图书馆协会(ACRL)信息素养框架在健康科学图书馆中的认知、采用与应用。
J Med Libr Assoc. 2017 Oct;105(4):347-354. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2017.131. Epub 2017 Oct 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Modelling of physicians' clinical information-seeking behaviour in Iran: a grounded theory study.伊朗医生临床信息检索行为建模:扎根理论研究。
BMJ Open. 2024 Apr 16;14(4):e080602. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-080602.
2
Personalized and Self-Management: Systematic Search and Evaluation Quality Factors and User Preference of Drug Reference Apps in Taiwan.个性化与自我管理:台湾地区药品参考应用程序的系统搜索、评估质量因素及用户偏好
J Pers Med. 2021 Aug 12;11(8):790. doi: 10.3390/jpm11080790.

本文引用的文献

1
Clinical information seeking behavior of physicians: A systematic review.医生的临床信息检索行为:系统评价。
Int J Med Inform. 2020 Jul;139:104144. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2020.104144. Epub 2020 Apr 18.
2
Report from the Medical Library Association's InSight Initiative Summit 3: Bridge Building: What Bridges to Build and How.来自医学图书馆协会洞察计划峰会 3 的报告:构建桥梁:构建哪些桥梁以及如何构建。
J Med Libr Assoc. 2020 Apr;108(2):321-333. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2020.894. Epub 2020 Apr 1.
3
Open Access: Will the Paywalls Come Tumbling Down?
开放获取:付费壁垒会轰然倒塌吗?
Eur Heart J. 2019 Jul 14;40(27):2180-2181. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz493.
4
New Tools for Finding Full-Text Articles Faster: Kopernio, Nomad, Unpaywall, and More.更快找到全文文章的新工具:Kopernio、Nomad、Unpaywall等等。
Med Ref Serv Q. 2019 Jul-Sep;38(3):287-292. doi: 10.1080/02763869.2019.1629215.
5
Librarian Consults Through Epic: New Opportunities for Collaboration and Education.图书馆员通过Epic系统进行咨询:合作与教育的新机遇。
Med Ref Serv Q. 2019 Jul-Sep;38(3):293-299. doi: 10.1080/02763869.2019.1623610.
6
Promoting Library Visibility Through Creative Programing.通过创意活动提升图书馆知名度。
Med Ref Serv Q. 2019 Jul-Sep;38(3):236-251. doi: 10.1080/02763869.2019.1623616.
7
Barriers and facilitators to clinical information seeking: a systematic review.临床信息检索的障碍和促进因素:系统评价。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2019 Oct 1;26(10):1129-1140. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocz065.
8
Community Engagement at an Emerging Academic Medical Library: A Three-Pronged Outreach Model.新兴学术医学图书馆的社区参与:一种三管齐下的外展模式。
Med Ref Serv Q. 2018 Jul-Sep;37(3):234-248. doi: 10.1080/02763869.2018.1477707.
9
Sci-Hub provides access to nearly all scholarly literature.Sci-Hub 提供几乎所有学术文献的访问途径。
Elife. 2018 Mar 1;7:e32822. doi: 10.7554/eLife.32822.
10
Hospital nurses' information retrieval behaviours in relation to evidence based nursing: a literature review.医院护士在循证护理方面的信息检索行为:文献综述。
Health Info Libr J. 2018 Mar;35(1):3-23. doi: 10.1111/hir.12204. Epub 2018 Jan 12.