Ngamkham Srisuda, Yang James J, Smith Ellen Lavoie
Department of Fundamental Nursing and Nursing Administration, Boromarajonani College of Nursing Sawanpracharak Nakhonsawan, Nakhonsawan, Thailand.
Department of Biostatistics and Data Science, School of Public Health, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA.
Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs. 2020 Oct 15;8(1):58-67. doi: 10.4103/apjon.apjon_43_20. eCollection 2021 Jan-Feb.
This study aimed to evaluate Thai Buddhism-based Mindfulness (TBbM) feasibility based on recruitment and retention rates and to obtain preliminary data regarding changes (effect sizes) in pain severity and other outcomes when comparing control to intervention participants following TBbM use.
A randomized controlled trial was conducted in the Outpatient Department at Sawanpracharak Hospital, Thailand, from April 2018 to February 2019. Seventeen participants completed the pretest and posttest. Both groups (control group [n = 10] and intervention group [n = 7]) received usual care and watched a 25-min educational video about cancer pain. The intervention group participated in a 3-day mindfulness training program at a Buddhist temple and continued practicing at home for 8 weeks. Data were collected at baseline and at 1 and 2 months postintervention.
One-hundred and thirty-five participants met the eligibility criteria; 112 (82%) declined to participate and 6 of 23 (26%) were lost to follow-up/dropped out. Control and intervention participants had an average age of 44 (± 8.77) and 56 years (± 7.41), respectively. When compared to the control group, the TBbM participants reported no statistically significant improvements in pain or other outcomes. While not statistically significant, the effect size indicated that pain did improve in the TBbM group (Cohen's d = 0.41).
Given the suboptimal recruitment and retention rates, modification of the intervention is warranted. Further, our findings suggest that the intervention had a moderate effect on pain. To evaluate efficacy, future adequately powered studies are needed to test a more feasible TBbM intervention.
本研究旨在根据招募率和留存率评估基于泰国佛教的正念疗法(TBbM)的可行性,并在比较TBbM使用者的对照组和干预组时,获取有关疼痛严重程度和其他结果变化(效应量)的初步数据。
2018年4月至2019年2月在泰国萨旺普拉查拉克医院门诊部进行了一项随机对照试验。17名参与者完成了前测和后测。两组(对照组[n = 10]和干预组[n = 7])均接受常规护理,并观看了一段25分钟的关于癌症疼痛的教育视频。干预组在一座佛教寺庙参加了为期3天的正念训练计划,并在家中持续练习8周。在基线以及干预后1个月和2个月收集数据。
135名参与者符合纳入标准;112名(82%)拒绝参与,23名中的6名(26%)失访/退出。对照组和干预组参与者的平均年龄分别为44岁(±8.77)和56岁(±7.41)。与对照组相比,TBbM参与者在疼痛或其他结果方面没有统计学上的显著改善。虽然无统计学意义,但效应量表明TBbM组的疼痛确实有所改善(科恩d值 = 0.41)。
鉴于招募率和留存率不理想,有必要对干预措施进行调整。此外,我们的研究结果表明该干预对疼痛有中度影响。为了评估疗效,未来需要进行有足够效力的研究来测试更可行的TBbM干预措施。