Suppr超能文献

欧洲新冠疫情期间院外心脏骤停第一反应者计划的管理

Management of first responder programmes for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest during the COVID-19 pandemic in Europe.

作者信息

Andelius Linn, Oving Iris, Folke Fredrik, de Graaf Corina, Stieglis Remy, Kjoelbye Julie Samsoee, Hansen Carolina Malta, Koster Rudolph W, L Tan Hanno, Blom Marieke T

机构信息

Copenhagen Emergency Medical Services, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.

Department of Cardiology, Heart Center, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Resusc Plus. 2021 Mar;5:100075. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2020.100075. Epub 2021 Jan 2.

Abstract

AIM

First responder (FR) programmes dispatch professional FRs (police and/or firefighters) or citizen responders to perform cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and use automated external defibrillators (AED) in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). We aimed to describe management of FR-programmes across Europe in response to the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic.

METHODS

In June 2020, we conducted a cross-sectional survey sent to OHCA registry representatives in 18 European countries with active FR-programmes. The survey was administered by e-mail and included questions regarding management of both citizen responder and FR-programmes. A follow-up question was conducted in October 2020 assessing management during a potential "second wave" of COVID-19.

RESULTS

All representatives responded (response rate = 100%). Fourteen regions dispatched citizen responders and 17 regions dispatched professional FRs (9 regions dispatched both). Responses were post-hoc divided into three categories: FR activation continued unchanged, FR activation continued with restrictions, or FR activation temporarily paused. For citizen responders, regions either temporarily paused activation (n = 7, 50.0%) or continued activation with restrictions (n = 7, 50.0%). The most common restriction was to omit rescue breaths and perform compression-only CPR. For professional FRs, nine regions continued activation with restrictions (52.9%) and five regions (29.4%) continued activation unchanged, but with personal protective equipment available for the professional FRs. In three regions (17.6%), activation of professional FRs temporarily paused.

CONCLUSION

Most regions changed management of FR-programmes in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Studies are needed to investigate the consequences of pausing or restricting FR-programmes for bystander CPR and AED use, and how this may impact patient outcome.

摘要

目的

第一响应者(FR)计划派遣专业的第一响应者(警察和/或消防员)或市民响应者在院外心脏骤停(OHCA)时进行心肺复苏(CPR)并使用自动体外除颤器(AED)。我们旨在描述欧洲各地应对2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行时FR计划的管理情况。

方法

2020年6月,我们对18个实施活跃FR计划的欧洲国家的OHCA登记处代表进行了横断面调查。该调查通过电子邮件进行,包括有关市民响应者和FR计划管理的问题。2020年10月进行了后续问题调查,评估在COVID-19可能出现的“第二波”期间的管理情况。

结果

所有代表均做出回应(回复率 = 100%)。14个地区派遣了市民响应者,17个地区派遣了专业的第一响应者(9个地区两者都派遣)。回复事后分为三类:FR激活持续不变、FR激活在有限制的情况下继续或FR激活暂时暂停。对于市民响应者,各地区要么暂时暂停激活(n = 7,50.0%),要么在有限制的情况下继续激活(n = 7,50.0%)。最常见的限制是省略人工呼吸,仅进行胸外按压心肺复苏。对于专业的第一响应者,9个地区在有限制的情况下继续激活(52.9%),5个地区(29.4%)继续无变化地激活,但为专业的第一响应者提供了个人防护装备。在3个地区(17.6%),专业第一响应者的激活暂时暂停。

结论

大多数地区针对COVID-19大流行改变了FR计划的管理。需要开展研究以调查暂停或限制FR计划对旁观者心肺复苏和自动体外除颤器使用的影响,以及这可能如何影响患者预后。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7367/8244448/8425fde58309/gr1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验