Andelius Linn, Oving Iris, Folke Fredrik, de Graaf Corina, Stieglis Remy, Kjoelbye Julie Samsoee, Hansen Carolina Malta, Koster Rudolph W, L Tan Hanno, Blom Marieke T
Copenhagen Emergency Medical Services, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.
Department of Cardiology, Heart Center, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Resusc Plus. 2021 Mar;5:100075. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2020.100075. Epub 2021 Jan 2.
First responder (FR) programmes dispatch professional FRs (police and/or firefighters) or citizen responders to perform cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and use automated external defibrillators (AED) in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). We aimed to describe management of FR-programmes across Europe in response to the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic.
In June 2020, we conducted a cross-sectional survey sent to OHCA registry representatives in 18 European countries with active FR-programmes. The survey was administered by e-mail and included questions regarding management of both citizen responder and FR-programmes. A follow-up question was conducted in October 2020 assessing management during a potential "second wave" of COVID-19.
All representatives responded (response rate = 100%). Fourteen regions dispatched citizen responders and 17 regions dispatched professional FRs (9 regions dispatched both). Responses were post-hoc divided into three categories: FR activation continued unchanged, FR activation continued with restrictions, or FR activation temporarily paused. For citizen responders, regions either temporarily paused activation (n = 7, 50.0%) or continued activation with restrictions (n = 7, 50.0%). The most common restriction was to omit rescue breaths and perform compression-only CPR. For professional FRs, nine regions continued activation with restrictions (52.9%) and five regions (29.4%) continued activation unchanged, but with personal protective equipment available for the professional FRs. In three regions (17.6%), activation of professional FRs temporarily paused.
Most regions changed management of FR-programmes in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Studies are needed to investigate the consequences of pausing or restricting FR-programmes for bystander CPR and AED use, and how this may impact patient outcome.
第一响应者(FR)计划派遣专业的第一响应者(警察和/或消防员)或市民响应者在院外心脏骤停(OHCA)时进行心肺复苏(CPR)并使用自动体外除颤器(AED)。我们旨在描述欧洲各地应对2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行时FR计划的管理情况。
2020年6月,我们对18个实施活跃FR计划的欧洲国家的OHCA登记处代表进行了横断面调查。该调查通过电子邮件进行,包括有关市民响应者和FR计划管理的问题。2020年10月进行了后续问题调查,评估在COVID-19可能出现的“第二波”期间的管理情况。
所有代表均做出回应(回复率 = 100%)。14个地区派遣了市民响应者,17个地区派遣了专业的第一响应者(9个地区两者都派遣)。回复事后分为三类:FR激活持续不变、FR激活在有限制的情况下继续或FR激活暂时暂停。对于市民响应者,各地区要么暂时暂停激活(n = 7,50.0%),要么在有限制的情况下继续激活(n = 7,50.0%)。最常见的限制是省略人工呼吸,仅进行胸外按压心肺复苏。对于专业的第一响应者,9个地区在有限制的情况下继续激活(52.9%),5个地区(29.4%)继续无变化地激活,但为专业的第一响应者提供了个人防护装备。在3个地区(17.6%),专业第一响应者的激活暂时暂停。
大多数地区针对COVID-19大流行改变了FR计划的管理。需要开展研究以调查暂停或限制FR计划对旁观者心肺复苏和自动体外除颤器使用的影响,以及这可能如何影响患者预后。