Department of Anaesthesiology, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Anaesthesia. 2021 Jan;76 Suppl 1:65-73. doi: 10.1111/anae.15257.
With the widespread use of ultrasound for localising nerves during peripheral nerve blockade, the value of electrical nerve stimulation of evoked motor responses has been questioned. Studies continue to show that, compared with nerve stimulation, ultrasound guidance alone leads to: significantly improved block success; decreased need for rescue analgesia; decreased procedural pain; and lower rates of vascular puncture. Nerve stimulation combined with ultrasound does also not appear to improve block success rates, apart from those blocks where the nerves are challenging to view, such as the obturator nerve. The role of nerve stimulation has changed in the last 15 years from a technique to locate nerves to that of an adjunct to ultrasound. Nerve stimulation can serve as a monitor against needle-nerve contact and may be useful in avoiding nerves that are in the needle trajectory during specific ultrasound guided techniques. Nerve stimulation is also a useful adjunct in teaching novices ultrasound-guided regional anaesthesia, especially when the position and or appearance of nerves may be variable. In this review, the changing role of nerve stimulation in contemporary regional anaesthetic practice is presented and discussed.
随着超声在周围神经阻滞中用于定位神经的广泛应用,诱发运动反应的电神经刺激的价值受到了质疑。研究继续表明,与神经刺激相比,单独使用超声引导可导致:显著提高阻滞成功率;减少需要急救镇痛;减少操作疼痛;以及降低血管穿刺率。神经刺激联合超声似乎也不能提高阻滞成功率,除了那些神经难以观察的阻滞,如闭孔神经。在过去的 15 年中,神经刺激的作用已经从定位神经的技术转变为超声的辅助技术。神经刺激可以作为防止针与神经接触的监测手段,并且在某些特定的超声引导技术中,可能有助于避免针轨迹中的神经。神经刺激也是在教授新手超声引导区域麻醉时的有用辅助手段,尤其是在神经的位置或外观可能有所不同时。在这篇综述中,介绍和讨论了神经刺激在当代区域麻醉实践中的作用变化。