384819Athabasca University, Canada.
Nurs Ethics. 2021 Aug;28(5):766-775. doi: 10.1177/0969733020976185. Epub 2021 Jan 11.
In 2016, the Supreme Court of Canada legalized medical assistance in dying in Canada. Similar to jurisdictions where this has been a more long-standing option for end-of-life care, the Supreme Court's decision in Canada included a caveat that no healthcare provider could be compelled to participate in medical assistance in dying. The Canadian Nurses Association, in alignment with numerous ethical guidelines for healthcare providers around the globe, maintains that nurses may opt out of participation in medical assistance in dying if they conscientiously object to this procedure. The realities of implementing medical assistance in dying are still unfolding. One area that has received little attention in the literature thus far is the ability of nurses who rather than medical assistance in dying to conscientiously object. This is particularly significant in rural and remote areas of Canada where geographic dispersion and limited numbers of nursing staff create conditions that limit the ability to transfer care or call on a designated team. Exercising conscientious objection to medical assistance in dying in rural and remote areas, by way of policies developed with an urban focus, is one example of how the needs of rural nurses and patients may not be met, leading to issues of patient access to medical assistance in dying and retention of nursing staff. To illustrate the complexities of nurses' conscientious objection to medical assistance in dying in a rural setting, we apply an ethical decision-making framework to a hypothetical case scenario and discuss the potential consequences and implications for future policy. Realizing that conscientious objection may not be a viable option in a rural or remote context has implications for not only medical assistance in dying, but other ethically sensitive healthcare services as well. These considerations have implications for policy in other jurisdictions allowing or considering medically assisted deaths, as well as other rural and remote areas where nurses may face ethical dilemmas.
2016 年,加拿大最高法院使医疗协助自杀合法化。与该程序在其他司法管辖区已经存在较长时间的情况类似,加拿大最高法院的裁决规定,任何医疗保健提供者都不得被迫参与医疗协助自杀。加拿大护士协会与全球众多医疗保健提供者的道德准则保持一致,认为如果护士出于良心反对该程序,可以选择不参与医疗协助自杀。实施医疗协助自杀的现实情况仍在不断发展。到目前为止,文献中很少关注的一个领域是,那些宁愿选择不参与医疗协助自杀的护士的能力。在加拿大农村和偏远地区,这种情况尤其重要,因为地理分散和护理人员数量有限,限制了转介护理或调用指定团队的能力。通过制定以城市为重点的政策,在农村和偏远地区对医疗协助自杀行使出于良心的反对,是如何无法满足农村护士和患者的需求的一个例子,导致患者获得医疗协助自杀的机会和护理人员的保留问题。为了说明农村环境中护士对医疗协助自杀出于良心的反对的复杂性,我们将伦理决策框架应用于一个假设案例,并讨论潜在的后果和对未来政策的影响。认识到在农村或偏远地区出于良心的反对可能不是一个可行的选择,这不仅对医疗协助自杀,而且对其他涉及伦理敏感性的医疗保健服务都有影响。这些考虑因素对允许或考虑医疗协助死亡的其他司法管辖区的政策以及其他可能面临伦理困境的农村和偏远地区的政策都有影响。