Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Department of Surgical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Laryngoscope. 2021 Jul;131(7):E2232-E2242. doi: 10.1002/lary.29375. Epub 2021 Jan 11.
To understand changes in frailty and quality of life (QOL) in frail versus non-frail patients undergoing surgery for head and neck cancer (HNC).
Prospective cohort study of patients (median age 67 (50, 88)) with HNC undergoing surgery from December 2011 to April 2014. Fried's Frailty Index, Vulnerable Elders Survey (VES-13), and comprehensive QOL assessments (EORTC QLQ-C30 and HN35) were completed at baseline and 3, 6, and 12-month post-operative visits. Change in frailty and QOL over time was compared between frailty groups (non-frail (score 0), pre-frail (score 1-2), and frail (score 3-5)) using a mixed effects model. Predictors of long-term elevated frailty (12 months > baseline) were analyzed using logistic regression.
The study had 108 patients classified as non-frail (47%), 104 pre-frail (mean (SD) 1.3 (0.4), 45%), and 17 frail (3.4 (0.6); 7%). Frailty score decreased significantly for frail patients 3 months post-operatively (2.1 (1.0); P = .002) and remained significantly lower than baseline at 6 and 12 months (2.1 (1.4); P = .0008 and 2.2 (1.5); P = .005, respectively) while frailty score increased for non-frail patients at 3 months (1.1 (1.0); P < .001) and then decreased. Forty-eight patients (21%) had long-term elevated frailty, with baseline frailty and marital status identified as predictors on univariate analysis. The frail population had significantly worse QOL scores at baseline, which persisted 12 months post-operatively.
Frail patients demonstrate a decrease in frailty score following surgical treatment of HNC. Frail patients have significantly worse QOL scores on longitudinal assessment and would benefit from supportive services throughout their care.
3 Laryngoscope, 131:E2232-E2242, 2021.
了解头颈部癌症(HNC)手术患者虚弱和生活质量(QOL)的变化情况,虚弱患者与非虚弱患者相比。
对 2011 年 12 月至 2014 年 4 月接受手术治疗的 HNC 患者(中位年龄 67(50,88)岁)进行前瞻性队列研究。患者在基线和术后 3、6 和 12 个月时完成 Fried 虚弱指数、脆弱老年人调查(VES-13)和综合 QOL 评估(EORTC QLQ-C30 和 HN35)。使用混合效应模型比较不同虚弱组(非虚弱(评分 0)、虚弱前期(评分 1-2)和虚弱(评分 3-5))之间的虚弱和 QOL 随时间的变化。使用逻辑回归分析长期虚弱(12 个月>基线)的预测因素。
该研究共纳入 108 例非虚弱患者(47%)、104 例虚弱前期患者(平均(SD)1.3(0.4),45%)和 17 例虚弱患者(3.4(0.6);7%)。术后 3 个月,虚弱患者的虚弱评分显著下降(2.1(1.0);P=.002),6 个月和 12 个月时仍明显低于基线(2.1(1.4);P=.0008 和 2.2(1.5);P=.005),而非虚弱患者的虚弱评分在 3 个月时增加(1.1(1.0);P<.001),然后下降。48 例患者(21%)存在长期虚弱,单因素分析显示基线虚弱和婚姻状况为预测因素。虚弱组患者基线 QOL 评分明显较差,术后 12 个月仍持续存在。
HNC 手术治疗后,虚弱患者的虚弱评分下降。虚弱患者在纵向评估中 QOL 评分明显较差,在整个治疗过程中需要得到支持性服务。
3 Laryngoscope, 131:E2232-E2242, 2021.