Suppr超能文献

老年 8 项衰弱与癌症老年患者健康相关生活质量的关系(PROGNOSIS-G8):一项丹麦单中心前瞻性队列研究。

Association between Geriatric 8 frailty and health-related quality of life in older patients with cancer (PROGNOSIS-G8): a Danish single-centre, prospective cohort study.

机构信息

Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark; Academy of Geriatric Cancer Research (AgeCare), Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark; OPEN Odense Patient data Explorative Network, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark; Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.

Academy of Geriatric Cancer Research (AgeCare), Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark; OPEN Odense Patient data Explorative Network, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark; Department of Geriatric Medicine, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark; Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.

出版信息

Lancet Healthy Longev. 2024 Sep;5(9):100612. doi: 10.1016/S2666-7568(24)00118-1. Epub 2024 Aug 29.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is highly valued among older adults with cancer. The Geriatric 8 screening tool identifies individuals with frailty, but its association with HRQoL remains sparsely investigated. Herein, we evaluate whether Geriatric 8 frailty is associated with short-term and long-term HRQoL in older patients with cancer.

METHODS

In this Danish single-centre, prospective cohort study, patients aged 70 years and older, referred to oncological assessment for solid cancers, were screened with the Geriatric 8. Patients completed the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality-of-Life Core 30 (QLQ-C30) and Elderly 14 (ELD14) questionnaires at baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, and 12 months. Patient characteristics were obtained from medical records. Differences in mean global health status and QoL (GHS), measured using the two seven-point Likert scale questions from the EORTC QLQ-C30 regarding overall health and QoL during the past week, between patients with frailty (defined as a Geriatric 8 score of ≤14) and without frailty within 12 months were the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes were differences in the mean EORTC Summary Score comprised of all questions from the QLQ-C30 except for those included in the GHS and a question concerning financial difficulties, and five functional (physical, role, and social functioning, maintaining purpose, and family support from the EORTC QLQ-C30 and the EORTC-QLQ-ELD14), and five symptom scales (fatigue, pain, mobility, future worries, and burden of illness from the EORTC-QLQ-C30 and the EORTC-QLQ-ELD14). Analyses were done using linear mixed models. All primary and secondary outcomes were adjusted for gender, treatment intent, and cancer type and the primary outcome was also assessed by means of a responder analysis.

FINDINGS

Between June 1, 2020 and Oct 15, 2021, 1398 eligible patients were screened with the Geriatric 8 (908 [65%] with frailty and 490 [35%] without frailty) and provided medical record data. Of these patients, 707 (51%) also provided HRQoL data (437 [62%] with frailty and 270 [38%] without frailty). When adjusted, patients with frailty had poorer GHS (-15·1, 95% CI -18·5 to -11·6; p<0·0001) at baseline and throughout follow-up (3 months -7·4, -11·0 to -3·7, p=0·0001; 6 months -11·7, -15·5 to -7·9, p<0·0001; 9 months -10·4, -14·3 to -6·5, p<0·0001; 12 months -10·4, -14·6 to -6·2, p<0·0001) compared to patients without frailty. Adjusted summary scores were also poorer for patients with frailty (-9·9, 95% CI -12·1 to -7·6; p<0·0001) compared to patients without frailty at baseline and throughout follow-up (3 months -8·2, -10·5 to -5·8, p=0·0001; 6 months -9·0, -11·4 to -6·6, p<0·0001; 9 months -9·2, -11·7 to -6·8, p<0·0001; 12 months -8·9, -11·5 to -6·3, p<0·0001). Patients with frailty had significantly worse physical and role functioning, mobility, and fatigue outcomes, with no differences in family support within 12 months, at all timepoints.

INTERPRETATION

Older patients with cancer and frailty have significantly poorer HRQoL than those without frailty within the 12 months following an oncology referral. Thus, by identifying and treating frailty, we can ultimately improve patient HRQoL.

FUNDING

The Danish Cancer Society, Academy of Geriatric Cancer Research (AgeCare), Odense University Hospital, University of Southern Denmark, Dagmar Marshalls Fond, and Agnes and Poul Friis Fond.

摘要

背景

健康相关的生活质量(HRQoL)在老年癌症患者中受到高度重视。老年 8 项筛查工具可识别出虚弱的个体,但它与 HRQoL 的关联仍鲜有研究。在此,我们评估老年癌症患者的老年 8 项虚弱是否与短期和长期的 HRQoL 相关。

方法

这是一项丹麦单中心前瞻性队列研究,对 70 岁及以上的接受实体瘤评估的患者进行老年 8 项筛查。患者在基线、3 个月、6 个月、9 个月和 12 个月时完成欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织(EORTC)核心 30 项(QLQ-C30)和老年人 14 项(ELD14)问卷。患者特征从病历中获得。在 12 个月内,通过使用 EORTC QLQ-C30 中关于过去一周整体健康和生活质量的两个七点李克特量表问题的平均值,评估虚弱(定义为老年 8 项评分≤14)和无虚弱患者之间的总体健康状况和 QoL(GHS)的差异作为主要结局。次要结局为 EORTC 综合评分的差异,该评分由 QLQ-C30 中的所有问题组成,除了 GHS 中包含的问题和一个关于经济困难的问题,以及五个功能(身体、角色和社会功能、保持目的和家庭支持)来自 EORTC QLQ-C30 和 EORTC-QLQ-ELD14,以及五个症状量表(疲劳、疼痛、活动能力、未来担忧和疾病负担)来自 EORTC-QLQ-C30 和 EORTC-QLQ-ELD14。分析采用线性混合模型进行。所有主要和次要结局均根据性别、治疗意图和癌症类型进行调整,主要结局还通过应答分析进行评估。

结果

2020 年 6 月 1 日至 2021 年 10 月 15 日,对 1398 名符合条件的患者进行了老年 8 项筛查(908 名有虚弱,490 名无虚弱),并提供了病历数据。其中 707 名患者(51%)还提供了 HRQoL 数据(437 名有虚弱,270 名无虚弱)。调整后,虚弱患者的 GHS 较差(-15.1,95%CI-18.5 至-11.6;p<0.0001),且在整个随访期间均如此(3 个月时-7.4,-11.0 至-3.7,p=0.0001;6 个月时-11.7,-15.5 至-7.9,p<0.0001;9 个月时-10.4,-14.3 至-6.5,p<0.0001;12 个月时-10.4,-14.6 至-6.2,p<0.0001)。与无虚弱的患者相比,虚弱患者的综合评分也较差(-9.9,95%CI-12.1 至-7.6;p<0.0001),且在整个随访期间均如此(3 个月时-8.2,-10.5 至-5.8,p=0.0001;6 个月时-9.0,-11.4 至-6.6,p<0.0001;9 个月时-9.2,-11.7 至-6.8,p<0.0001;12 个月时-8.9,-11.5 至-6.3,p<0.0001)。虚弱患者的身体和角色功能、活动能力和疲劳结局明显更差,12 个月内家庭支持无差异,所有时间点均如此。

解释

与无虚弱的患者相比,老年癌症患者在接受肿瘤学评估后的 12 个月内,虚弱患者的 HRQoL 明显更差。因此,通过识别和治疗虚弱,我们最终可以改善患者的 HRQoL。

资助

丹麦癌症协会、老年癌症研究学会(AgeCare)、奥胡斯大学医院、南丹麦大学、Agnes 和 Poul Friis 基金会。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验