• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项系统招募计划后一般心脏病学研究员中女性和代表性不足的种族和族裔群体的评估。

Evaluation of Women and Underrepresented Racial and Ethnic Group Representation in a General Cardiology Fellowship After a Systematic Recruitment Initiative.

机构信息

Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina.

Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.

出版信息

JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Jan 4;4(1):e2030832. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.30832.

DOI:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.30832
PMID:33427883
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7801933/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

The proportion of women and underrepresented racial and ethnic groups (UREGs) matriculating into general cardiology fellowships remains low.

OBJECTIVE

To assess a systematic recruitment initiative aimed at ensuring adequate matriculation of women and UREGs in a general cardiology fellowship.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This quality improvement study took place at a large, tertiary academic medical center and associated Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education Cardiovascular Disease fellowship. Participants included cardiology fellowship and divisional leadership and general cardiology fellow applicants to the Duke Cardiovascular Disease Fellowship Program from 2017 to 2019. Data analysis was performed from December 2019 to May 2020.

EXPOSURE

Multipronged initiative that created an environment committed to ensuring equity of opportunity. This included the creation of a fellowship diversity and inclusivity task force that drafted recommendations, which included reorganization of the fellowship recruitment committee, and changes to the applicant screening process, the interview day, applicant ranking process, and postmatch interventions.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The percentage of matriculating and overall women and UREGs before and after the interventions were recorded.

RESULTS

The fellowship received a mean (SD) of 462 (55) applications annually before the interventions (2006-2016) and 611 (27) applications annually after the interventions (2017-2019). Between the 10-year period before the interventions and the 3-year period during the interventions, there was a significant increase in the annual mean (SD) percentage of women (22.4% [2.9%] vs 26.4% [0.07%]; P < .001) and UREG applicants (10.5% [1.1%] vs 12.5% [1.9%]; P = .01) to the program. Among applicants interviewed, the percentage of women increased from 20.0% to 33.5% (P = .01) and that of and UREGs increased from 14.0% to 20.0% (P = .01). Before the interventions, a mean (SD) of 23.2% (16.2%) women and 9.7% (7.8%) UREGs matriculated as first-year fellows, whereas after the interventions, a mean (SD) of 54.2% (7.2%) women and 33.3% (19.0%) UREGs matriculated as first-year fellows. The proportion of the entire fellowship who were women increased from a 5-year mean (SD) of 27.0% (8.8%) to 54.2% (7.2%) after 3 years of interventions, and that of UREGs increased from 5.6% (4.6%) to 33.3% (19.0%). Overall, the proportion of applicants in the entire population who were either women or from UREGs increased from 27.8% to 66.7%.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

After implementing interventions to promote equity of opportunity in the cardiovascular disease fellowship, the percentage of women and UREGs significantly increased in the fellowship over a 3-year time period. These interventions may be applicable to other cardiovascular disease fellowships seeking to diversify training programs.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/79c7/7801933/5c12daacb8ad/jamanetwopen-e2030832-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/79c7/7801933/5c12daacb8ad/jamanetwopen-e2030832-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/79c7/7801933/5c12daacb8ad/jamanetwopen-e2030832-g001.jpg
摘要

重要性

进入普通心脏病学奖学金的女性和代表性不足的种族和族裔群体(UREG)的比例仍然很低。

目的

评估一项系统的招募计划,旨在确保女性和 UREG 在普通心脏病学奖学金中充分入学。

设计、地点和参与者:这项质量改进研究在一家大型的、三级学术医疗中心和相关的研究生医学教育认证委员会心血管疾病奖学金进行。参与者包括心脏病学奖学金和部门领导以及 2017 年至 2019 年期间申请杜克心血管疾病奖学金计划的普通心脏病学研究员申请人。数据分析于 2019 年 12 月至 2020 年 5 月进行。

暴露情况

采取了多管齐下的举措,营造了一个致力于确保机会公平的环境。这包括成立一个研究员多样性和包容性工作队,起草建议,包括改组研究员招募委员会,以及改变申请人筛选过程、面试日、申请人排名过程和后匹配干预措施。

主要结果和措施

记录干预前后入学和总体女性和 UREG 的百分比。

结果

该奖学金在干预前(2006-2016 年)每年平均收到 462(55)份申请,在干预后(2017-2019 年)每年收到 611(27)份申请。在干预前的 10 年期间和干预期间的 3 年期间,该计划的女性(22.4%[2.9%]与 26.4%[0.07%];P<0.001)和 UREG 申请人(10.5%[1.1%]与 12.5%[1.9%];P=0.01)的年度平均百分比显著增加。在接受面试的申请人中,女性的比例从 20.0%增加到 33.5%(P=0.01),UREG 的比例从 14.0%增加到 20.0%(P=0.01)。在干预之前,23.2%(16.2%)的女性和 9.7%(7.8%)的 UREG 作为第一年研究员入学,而在干预之后,54.2%(7.2%)的女性和 33.3%(19.0%)的 UREG 作为第一年研究员入学。女性在整个研究员中的比例从干预前的 5 年平均(SD)27.0%(8.8%)增加到 3 年后的 54.2%(7.2%),UREG 的比例从 5.6%(4.6%)增加到 33.3%(19.0%)。总体而言,整个申请人群体中女性或 UREG 申请人的比例从 27.8%增加到 66.7%。

结论和相关性

在实施促进心血管疾病奖学金机会均等的干预措施后,在 3 年时间内,该奖学金中女性和 UREG 的比例显著增加。这些干预措施可能适用于其他寻求多样化培训项目的心血管疾病奖学金。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of Women and Underrepresented Racial and Ethnic Group Representation in a General Cardiology Fellowship After a Systematic Recruitment Initiative.一项系统招募计划后一般心脏病学研究员中女性和代表性不足的种族和族裔群体的评估。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Jan 4;4(1):e2030832. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.30832.
2
Choosing a fellow or fellowship: a survey of pediatric otolaryngologists.选择研究员或研究员职位:儿科耳鼻喉科医生的调查。
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014 Feb;140(2):102-5. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2013.5859.
3
Association of Mentor-to-Program Contact and Applicant Rank Disclosure With Vitreoretinal Fellowship Applicant's Final Match Outcome in 2016 and 2017.2016 年和 2017 年导师与项目联系和申请人排名披露与玻璃体视网膜研究员申请人最终匹配结果的关联。
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2018 Jun 1;136(6):642-647. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2018.1107.
4
Trends in U.S. Pediatric Otolaryngology Fellowship Training.美国儿科耳鼻喉科住院医师培训趋势。
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015 Oct;141(10):919-22. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2015.1570.
5
Women in Orthopaedic Fellowships: What Is Their Match Rate, and What Specialties Do They Choose?参加骨科专科培训的女性:她们的匹配率是多少,以及她们选择了哪些专业?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Sep;474(9):1957-61. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-4829-9.
6
Trends in Race/Ethnicity Among Applicants and Matriculants to US Surgical Specialties, 2010-2018.2010-2018 年美国外科专业申请和入学学生的种族/民族趋势。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Nov 2;3(11):e2023509. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.23509.
7
Underrepresented Minorities are Underrepresented Among General Surgery Applicants Selected to Interview.在被选中参加面试的普通外科申请者中,代表性不足的少数族裔所占比例较低。
J Surg Educ. 2019 Nov-Dec;76(6):e15-e23. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2019.05.018. Epub 2019 Jun 5.
8
Increasing Diversity in Cardiology: A Fellowship Director's Perspective.心脏病学领域日益增加的多样性:一位 fellowship 主任的视角。
Cureus. 2021 Jul 12;13(7):e16344. doi: 10.7759/cureus.16344. eCollection 2021 Jul.
9
Fellowship Match Outcomes in the U.S. From 2010 to 2017: Analysis of San Francisco Match.2010 年至 2017 年美国住院医师匹配结果:旧金山匹配分析。
Am J Ophthalmol. 2020 Oct;218:261-267. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2020.06.008. Epub 2020 Jun 20.
10
Diversity Within the Most Competitive Internal Medicine Fellowships: Examining Trends from 2008 to 2018.竞争最激烈的内科住院医师培训项目中的多样性:审视2008年至2018年的趋势
J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Sep;35(9):2537-2544. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-06008-5. Epub 2020 Jul 14.

引用本文的文献

1
A Scoping Review of Interventions to Promote Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in the United States Healthcare Workforce.促进美国医疗保健劳动力多元化、公平性和包容性干预措施的范围审查
J Med Educ Curric Dev. 2025 May 19;12:23821205251333034. doi: 10.1177/23821205251333034. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
2
Investigating the Road to Equity: A Scoping Review of Solutions to Mitigate Implicit Bias in Assessment within Medical Education.探索公平之路:医学教育评估中减轻内隐偏见的解决方案综述
Perspect Med Educ. 2025 Mar 3;14(1):92-106. doi: 10.5334/pme.1716. eCollection 2025.
3
The Current State of Women in Cardiovascular Leadership and Their Impact on Trainee Program Selection.

本文引用的文献

1
The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education Mandates That You Attempt to Enhance Diversity in Your Cardiology Program: Great! (How Do We Do That?).毕业后医学教育认证委员会要求你努力提高心脏病学项目的多样性:太棒了!(我们该怎么做呢?)
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2020 Aug;13(8):e006912. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.120.006912. Epub 2020 Jun 17.
2
Trends in Racial and Ethnic Diversity in Internal Medicine Subspecialty Fellowships From 2006 to 2018.2006年至2018年内科专科住院医师培训中的种族和族裔多样性趋势
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Feb 5;3(2):e1920482. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.20482.
3
A Framework for Inclusive Graduate Medical Education Recruitment Strategies: Meeting the ACGME Standard for a Diverse and Inclusive Workforce.
心血管领域女性领导者的现状及其对学员项目选择的影响。
JACC Adv. 2023 Apr 26;2(3):100312. doi: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2023.100312. eCollection 2023 May.
4
Descriptive Analysis of Vitreoretinal Surgery Fellowship Program Directors.玻璃体视网膜手术 fellowship 项目主任的描述性分析
J Vitreoretin Dis. 2024 Feb 12;8(3):280-285. doi: 10.1177/24741264241230385. eCollection 2024 May-Jun.
5
Updates on Diversity Among Cardiology-Related Fellowships.心脏病学相关 fellowship 项目多样性的最新情况。
Cureus. 2023 Oct 16;15(10):e47111. doi: 10.7759/cureus.47111. eCollection 2023 Oct.
6
Addressing diversity in the physician workforce through social determinants of medical education.通过医学教育的社会决定因素解决医生队伍的多样性问题。
AEM Educ Train. 2023 Jun 27;7(Suppl 1):S88-S90. doi: 10.1002/aet2.10874. eCollection 2023 Jun.
7
Interventions Associated With Racial and Ethnic Diversity in US Graduate Medical Education: A Scoping Review.美国研究生医学教育中与种族和民族多样性相关的干预措施:范围综述。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Jan 3;6(1):e2249335. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.49335.
8
Match Outcomes for Cardiovascular Disease Fellowship Training: 2010 to 2021.心血管疾病研究员培训的匹配结果:2010 年至 2021 年。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2022 Dec 20;11(24):e028237. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.122.028237. Epub 2022 Dec 19.
9
Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Belonging in Cardiovascular Disease Fellowship Training.心血管疾病研究员培训中的多样性、公平性、包容性和归属感。
Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J. 2022 Jun 3;18(3):67-77. doi: 10.14797/mdcvj.1080. eCollection 2022.
10
Holistic Review, Mitigating Bias, and Other Strategies in Residency Recruitment for Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion: An Evidence-based Guide to Best Practices from the Council of Residency Directors in Emergency Medicine.整体评估、减少偏见及其他策略在多样性、公平性和包容性住培招聘中的应用:急诊住院医师规范化培训理事会的最佳实践循证指南
West J Emerg Med. 2022 May 10;23(3):345-352. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2022.3.54419.
包容的研究生医学教育招生策略框架:符合 ACGME 多元化和包容性劳动力标准
Acad Med. 2020 May;95(5):710-716. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000003073.
4
Assessment of Subspecialty Choices of Men and Women in Internal Medicine From 1991 to 2016.从 1991 年到 2016 年内科男性和女性亚专业选择的评估。
JAMA Intern Med. 2020 Jan 1;180(1):140-141. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.3833.
5
Career Preferences and Perceptions of Cardiology Among US Internal Medicine Trainees: Factors Influencing Cardiology Career Choice.美国内科住院医师对心脏病学的职业偏好和认知:影响心脏病学职业选择的因素。
JAMA Cardiol. 2018 Aug 1;3(8):682-691. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2018.1279.
6
Diversity Matters.多样性至关重要。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Sep 19;70(12):1525-1529. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.08.003.
7
Successful efforts to increase diversity in a cardiology fellowship training program.在一项心脏病学 fellowship 培训项目中增加多样性的成功举措。
J Grad Med Educ. 2013 Sep;5(3):481-5. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-12-00307.1.
8
Commentary: Diversity 3.0: a necessary systems upgrade.述评:多样性 3.0:必要的系统升级。
Acad Med. 2011 Dec;86(12):1487-9. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3182351f79.