Bhasin Amman, Musa Arif, Massoud Louis, Razikeen Azar, Noori Arshia, Ghandour Ali, Gelovani David, Afonso Luis C, Lieberman Randy, Vaidya Ajay
Internal Medicine, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, USA.
Radiology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, USA.
Cureus. 2021 Jul 12;13(7):e16344. doi: 10.7759/cureus.16344. eCollection 2021 Jul.
Background Underrepresented-minorities (URM) remain few in number amongst practicing cardiologists and across cardiology fellowship training programs in the U.S. Increased diversity is needed across the entire field and is particularly necessary within graduate medical education cardiology fellowship training programs. Objectives This cross-sectional study was performed to identify which strategies were supported and implemented by cardiology fellowship program directors (PDs) to increase URM representation, to determine which entities hold the responsibility to increase diversity according to program directors, and to quantify URM representation in cardiology fellowship programs. Methods A 15-item survey was submitted to all American College of Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) accredited cardiology fellowship programs via electronic mail. Results Of 250 cardiology fellowship programs, 71 responses were received (28.4%). The number of URM faculty varied from 0-1 to more than six, and URM faculty held leadership roles in most programs (62.0%). A total of 16 respondents (22.5%) were URM program directors. Most respondents agreed that diversity was important to their training program (85.9%). The majority endorsed direct recruitment of URM applicants (60.6%), opportunities for applicants to connect with (54.9%) or be recruited by URM fellows (54.9%), holistic application review (67.6%), promoting mentorship by URM faculty (69.0%), URM faculty involvement in applicant interviewing (54.9%), and increased recruitment of URM faculty members (73.2%). Program directors allocated major responsibility to increase diversity to fellowship programs (71.8%), residency programs (63.3%), and medical schools (53.5%). Conclusions This study found that most cardiology programs have URM faculty in leadership roles, and nearly a quarter of the surveyed program directors were URMs. Cardiology program directors endorsed and employed numerous strategies to increase diversity and URM representation in fellowship programs. Additionally, program directors held fellowship training programs most responsible for increasing URM representation in the field of cardiology.
在美国,从事心脏病学工作的医生以及整个心脏病学专科培训项目中,少数族裔代表人数仍然很少。整个领域都需要增加多样性,在研究生医学教育的心脏病学专科培训项目中尤为必要。目的:进行这项横断面研究,以确定心脏病学专科培训项目主任支持并实施了哪些策略来增加少数族裔代表人数,确定根据项目主任的说法哪些实体有责任增加多样性,并量化心脏病学专科培训项目中的少数族裔代表人数。方法:通过电子邮件向所有美国研究生医学教育认证委员会(ACGME)认证的心脏病学专科培训项目发送了一份包含15个问题的调查问卷。结果:在250个心脏病学专科培训项目中,收到了71份回复(28.4%)。少数族裔教员的数量从0至1名到6名以上不等,并且少数族裔教员在大多数项目中担任领导职务(62.0%)。共有16名受访者(22.5%)是少数族裔项目主任。大多数受访者同意多样性对他们的培训项目很重要(85.9%)。大多数人支持直接招募少数族裔申请人(60.6%)、申请人与少数族裔学员建立联系(54.9%)或被少数族裔学员招募(54.9%)的机会、全面的申请审核(67.6%)、促进少数族裔教员的指导(69.0%)、少数族裔教员参与申请人面试(54.9%)以及增加少数族裔教员的招聘(73.2%)。项目主任将增加多样性的主要责任分配给专科培训项目(71.8%)、住院医师培训项目(63.3%)和医学院(53.5%)。结论:本研究发现,大多数心脏病学项目都有担任领导职务的少数族裔教员,并且近四分之一的受访项目主任是少数族裔。心脏病学项目主任认可并采用了多种策略来增加专科培训项目中的多样性和少数族裔代表人数。此外,项目主任认为专科培训项目对增加心脏病学领域的少数族裔代表人数负有最大责任。