Valdoltra Orthopaedic Hospital, Jadranska cesta 31, 6280, Ankaran, Slovenia.
Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Int Orthop. 2021 Apr;45(4):883-889. doi: 10.1007/s00264-020-04897-z. Epub 2021 Jan 11.
To present a novel surgical technique for the Bernese peri-acetabular osteotomy (PAO) using electromagnetic navigation (EMN) and patient-specific templates (PST), and to evaluate it against the traditional fluoroscopic technique.
We included 40 dysplastic hips. All PAOs were performed using PST and EMN. We recorded learning-related complications. For the purpose of acetabular fragment correction analysis, patients were divided into two groups. In the study group (EMN group, 30 hips), the acetabular fragment was reoriented with the help of EMN. In the control group (XR group, 10 hips), the acetabular fragment was reoriented using fluoroscopy. We compared the difference between the planned and achieved position of the acetabular fragment and outcomes between both groups.
Two major complications occurred in four PAOs in the XR group only (first ten PAOs). The average absolute difference in planned and achieved lateral centre -edge angle (LCEA) and acetabular index (AI) was 1.2° ± 1.5° and 1.1° ± 2° for the EMN and 7° ± 6.1° and 6.3° ± 6.3° for the XR group (p = 0.02; p = 0.03). The average surgery duration was 183 ± 32 minutes for the EMN and 203 ± 42 minutes for the XR group (p = 0.19). At the last follow-up, the average Harris Hip Score (HHS) value was 88 ± 12 in the EMN and 86 ± 14 in the XR group (p = 0.84).
Our study indicates that PAO performed with EMN and PST seems to be a safe and reproducible procedure with a short learning curve. Additionally, navigated reorientation of the acetabular fragment is significantly more accurate than the fluoroscopic technique.
介绍一种使用电磁导航(EMN)和患者特定模板(PST)的新型伯尔尼髋臼周围截骨术(PAO)手术技术,并将其与传统透视技术进行比较。
我们纳入了 40 例髋臼发育不良的髋关节。所有 PAO 均使用 PST 和 EMN 进行。我们记录了与学习相关的并发症。为了髋臼骨块校正分析的目的,我们将患者分为两组。在研究组(EMN 组,30 髋)中,使用 EMN 重新定位髋臼骨块。在对照组(XR 组,10 髋)中,使用透视重新定位髋臼骨块。我们比较了计划髋臼骨块位置与实际髋臼骨块位置之间的差异以及两组之间的结果。
仅在 XR 组的前 10 例 PAO 中发生了 2 例重大并发症。EMN 组计划和实际外侧中心边缘角(LCEA)和髋臼指数(AI)的平均绝对差值分别为 1.2°±1.5°和 1.1°±2°,而 XR 组分别为 7°±6.1°和 6.3°±6.3°(p=0.02;p=0.03)。EMN 组的平均手术时间为 183±32 分钟,XR 组为 203±42 分钟(p=0.19)。在最后一次随访时,EMN 组的平均 Harris 髋关节评分(HHS)值为 88±12,XR 组为 86±14(p=0.84)。
我们的研究表明,使用 EMN 和 PST 进行 PAO 似乎是一种安全且可重复的手术方法,具有较短的学习曲线。此外,导航引导的髋臼骨块重新定位明显比透视技术更准确。