• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

药物涂层球囊治疗股腘动脉病变支架内再狭窄的长期临床疗效

Long-term clinical effectiveness of a drug-coated balloon for in-stent restenosis in Femoropopliteal lesions.

作者信息

Horie Kazunori, Tanaka Akiko, Suzuki Kenji, Taguri Masataka, Inoue Naoto

机构信息

Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Sendai Kousei Hospital, 4-15 Hirose-cho, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi, 980-0873, Japan.

Department of Cardiology, Tokyo Saiseikai Central Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

CVIR Endovasc. 2021 Jan 11;4(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s42155-021-00205-x.

DOI:10.1186/s42155-021-00205-x
PMID:33428019
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7801575/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The short-term efficacy of paclitaxel-coated balloons (PCBs) has been established in femoropopliteal in-stent restenosis (ISR) lesions. The aim of this study was to compare 5-year clinical outcomes of patients with femoropopliteal ISR lesions undergoing percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) with and without PCB.

METHODS

After 1:1 propensity score matching, we extracted 50 patients with femoropopliteal ISR lesions undergoing PTA with (n = 25) and without (n = 25) IN.PACT PCB (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN) from 106 consecutive ISR patients treated in our hospital between 2009 and 2015. We compared the 5-year outcomes between PCB and non-PCB groups. The primary endpoint was the cumulative 5-year incidence of recurrent restenosis. All-cause mortality, target lesion revascularization (TLR) and unplanned major amputation were also assessed.

RESULTS

The primary patency after PCB treatment at 5 years was significantly higher than the patency after non-PCB treatment (65.7% vs. 18.7%; hazard ratio [HR]: 6.11; 95% confidence intervals [CI]: 2.57-16.82; p < 0.001), as well as freedom from TLR (77.6% vs. 53.8%; HR: 3.55; 95% CI: 1.21-12.83; p = 0.020). All-cause mortality and unplanned major amputation rates did not significantly differ between the two groups. The Cox proportional hazard multivariate analysis showed that PCB was independently associated with preventing recurrent restenosis (HR: 0.17; 95% CI: 0.06-0.41; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

At 5 years, patients with femoropopliteal ISR lesions undergoing PCB treatment showed significantly lower recurrent restenosis than those that underwent non-PCB treatment.

EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE: Level of Evidence: Level 2b, Non-randomized controlled cohort/follow-up study.

摘要

背景

紫杉醇涂层球囊(PCBs)在股腘动脉支架内再狭窄(ISR)病变中的短期疗效已得到证实。本研究的目的是比较接受经皮腔内血管成形术(PTA)且使用和不使用PCB的股腘动脉ISR病变患者的5年临床结局。

方法

在1:1倾向评分匹配后,我们从2009年至2015年在我院接受治疗的106例连续ISR患者中,提取了50例接受PTA且使用(n = 25)和不使用(n = 25)IN.PACT PCB(美敦力公司,明尼阿波利斯,明尼苏达州)的股腘动脉ISR病变患者。我们比较了PCB组和非PCB组的5年结局。主要终点是复发性再狭窄的5年累积发生率。还评估了全因死亡率、靶病变血管重建术(TLR)和非计划性大截肢。

结果

5年时PCB治疗后的主要通畅率显著高于非PCB治疗后的通畅率(65.7%对18.7%;风险比[HR]:6.11;95%置信区间[CI]:2.57 - 16.82;p < 0.001),以及无TLR率(77.6%对53.8%;HR:3.55;95% CI:1.21 - 12.83;p = 0.020)。两组间全因死亡率和非计划性大截肢率无显著差异。Cox比例风险多变量分析显示,PCB与预防复发性再狭窄独立相关(HR:0.17;95% CI:0.06 - 0.41;p < 0.001)。

结论

在5年时,接受PCB治疗的股腘动脉ISR病变患者的复发性再狭窄显著低于接受非PCB治疗的患者。

循证医学

证据水平:2b级,非随机对照队列/随访研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f1d0/7801575/dd883caf9a9b/42155_2021_205_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f1d0/7801575/fca4a1443b90/42155_2021_205_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f1d0/7801575/a3b03155dbdd/42155_2021_205_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f1d0/7801575/dd883caf9a9b/42155_2021_205_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f1d0/7801575/fca4a1443b90/42155_2021_205_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f1d0/7801575/a3b03155dbdd/42155_2021_205_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f1d0/7801575/dd883caf9a9b/42155_2021_205_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Long-term clinical effectiveness of a drug-coated balloon for in-stent restenosis in Femoropopliteal lesions.药物涂层球囊治疗股腘动脉病变支架内再狭窄的长期临床疗效
CVIR Endovasc. 2021 Jan 11;4(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s42155-021-00205-x.
2
Outcomes and Comparative Analysis of the Initial Results of Standard Balloon Angioplasty Versus Drug-Coated Balloons Alone Versus in Association With Laser-Excimer Atherectomy in the Treatment of Femoropopliteal Artery In-Stent Restenosis (INTACT).标准球囊血管成形术、单纯药物涂层球囊以及联合准分子激光斑块旋切术治疗股腘动脉支架内再狭窄的初步结果(INTACT)的疗效及对比分析
J Endovasc Ther. 2024 Apr 24:15266028241248333. doi: 10.1177/15266028241248333.
3
Long-Term Outcomes After Treatment With a Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon Versus Balloon Angioplasty: Insights From the PEPCAD-DES Study (Treatment of Drug-eluting Stent [DES] In-Stent Restenosis With SeQuent Please Paclitaxel-Coated Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty [PTCA] Catheter).紫杉醇涂层球囊与球囊血管成形术治疗的长期结果:PEPCAD-DES 研究的见解(使用 SeQuent Please 紫杉醇涂层经皮腔内冠状动脉血管成形术 [PTCA] 导管治疗药物洗脱支架 [DES] 支架内再狭窄)。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Nov;8(13):1695-700. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2015.07.023.
4
Drug-Eluting Stent vs Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty for Treatment of Femoropopliteal In-Stent Restenosis: Results From a Retrospective 1-Year Multicenter Study.药物洗脱支架与经皮腔内血管成形术治疗股腘动脉支架内再狭窄:一项回顾性1年多中心研究的结果
J Endovasc Ther. 2016 Aug;23(4):642-7. doi: 10.1177/1526602816642195. Epub 2016 Apr 20.
5
Laser atherectomy and drug-coated balloons for the treatment of femoropopliteal in-stent restenosis: 2-Year outcomes.激光动脉粥样切除术和药物涂层球囊治疗股腘段支架内再狭窄:2 年结果。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Feb 15;95(3):439-446. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28636. Epub 2019 Dec 9.
6
[Paclitaxel-coated balloons for in-stent restenosis treatment: long-term clinical results and predictors of recurrent target lesion revascularization].用于支架内再狭窄治疗的紫杉醇涂层球囊:长期临床结果及靶病变再次血管重建的预测因素
G Ital Cardiol (Rome). 2018 Apr;19(4):232-238. doi: 10.1714/2898.29217.
7
Paclitaxel-Eluting Balloon vs Standard Angioplasty to Reduce Restenosis in Diabetic Patients With In-Stent Restenosis of the Superficial Femoral and Proximal Popliteal Arteries: Three-Year Results of the DEBATE-ISR Study.紫杉醇洗脱球囊与标准血管成形术治疗股浅动脉和腘动脉近端支架内再狭窄糖尿病患者以降低再狭窄:DEBATE-ISR研究的三年结果
J Endovasc Ther. 2016 Feb;23(1):52-7. doi: 10.1177/1526602815614555. Epub 2015 Oct 28.
8
A multicenter randomized comparison of paclitaxel-coated balloon catheter with conventional balloon angioplasty in patients with bare-metal stent restenosis and drug-eluting stent restenosis.紫杉醇涂层球囊导管与常规球囊血管成形术治疗金属裸支架再狭窄和药物洗脱支架再狭窄患者的多中心随机比较。
Am Heart J. 2013 Sep;166(3):527-33. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2013.07.002. Epub 2013 Aug 13.
9
Comparative efficacy of two paclitaxel-coated balloons with different excipient coatings in patients with coronary in-stent restenosis: A pooled analysis of the Intracoronary Stenting and Angiographic Results: Optimizing Treatment of Drug Eluting Stent In-Stent Restenosis 3 and 4 (ISAR-DESIRE 3 and ISAR-DESIRE 4) trials.两种不同赋形剂涂层紫杉醇涂层球囊治疗冠状动脉支架内再狭窄患者的疗效比较:腔内支架置入和血管造影结果优化治疗药物洗脱支架内再狭窄 3 期和 4 期(ISAR-DESIRE 3 和 ISAR-DESIRE 4)试验的汇总分析。
Int J Cardiol. 2018 Feb 1;252:57-62. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.11.076. Epub 2017 Nov 28.
10
Drug-Coated Balloons for Complex Femoropopliteal Lesions: 2-Year Results of a Real-World Registry.药物涂层球囊治疗复杂股腘动脉病变:真实世界注册研究的 2 年结果。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Apr 11;9(7):715-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2015.12.267.

引用本文的文献

1
Factors associated with recurrence after drug-coated balloon therapy for femoropopliteal in-stent restenosis.药物涂层球囊治疗股腘动脉支架内再狭窄后复发的相关因素。
Heart Vessels. 2025 Jun;40(6):461-470. doi: 10.1007/s00380-024-02487-2. Epub 2024 Nov 18.
2
Repeat drug-coated balloon angioplasty for femoropopliteal lesions: 12-month results from a retrospective observational study.股腘动脉病变的重复药物涂层球囊血管成形术:一项回顾性观察研究的12个月结果
CVIR Endovasc. 2024 Feb 29;7(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s42155-024-00434-w.
3
The Diagnostic Value of Circulating Biomarkers and Role of Drug-Coated Balloons for In-Stent Restenosis in Patients with Peripheral Arterial Disease.

本文引用的文献

1
Mortality with Paclitaxel-Coated Devices in Peripheral Artery Disease.紫杉醇涂层器械在外周动脉疾病中的死亡率。
N Engl J Med. 2020 Dec 24;383(26):2538-2546. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2005206. Epub 2020 Dec 9.
2
A systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy of debulking devices for in-stent restenosis of the femoropopliteal artery.系统评价和荟萃分析去复块装置治疗股腘动脉支架内再狭窄的疗效。
J Vasc Surg. 2020 Jul;72(1):356-366.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2019.11.058. Epub 2020 Feb 21.
3
Laser atherectomy and drug-coated balloons for the treatment of femoropopliteal in-stent restenosis: 2-Year outcomes.
循环生物标志物对周围动脉疾病患者支架内再狭窄的诊断价值及药物涂层球囊的作用
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Sep 12;12(9):2207. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12092207.
激光动脉粥样切除术和药物涂层球囊治疗股腘段支架内再狭窄:2 年结果。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Feb 15;95(3):439-446. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28636. Epub 2019 Dec 9.
4
Long-Term Clinical Effectiveness of a Drug-Coated Balloon for the Treatment of Femoropopliteal Lesions.药物涂层球囊治疗股腘动脉病变的长期临床疗效。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Jun;12(6):e007702. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.118.007702. Epub 2019 Jun 14.
5
Drug-Coated Balloon Angioplasty for Femoropopliteal In-Stent Restenosis.药物涂层球囊血管成形术治疗股腘段支架内再狭窄。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Dec;11(12):e007055. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.118.007055.
6
Risk of Death Following Application of Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons and Stents in the Femoropopliteal Artery of the Leg: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.紫杉醇涂层球囊和支架在下肢股腘动脉中的应用死亡风险:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2018 Dec 18;7(24):e011245. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.011245.
7
A polymer-coated, paclitaxel-eluting stent (Eluvia) versus a polymer-free, paclitaxel-coated stent (Zilver PTX) for endovascular femoropopliteal intervention (IMPERIAL): a randomised, non-inferiority trial.聚合物涂层紫杉醇洗脱支架(Eluvia)与无聚合物紫杉醇涂层支架(Zilver PTX)治疗下肢股腘动脉腔内介入治疗(IMPERIAL):一项随机非劣效试验。
Lancet. 2018 Oct 27;392(10157):1541-1551. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32262-1. Epub 2018 Sep 24.
8
2017 ESC Guidelines on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Peripheral Arterial Diseases, in collaboration with the European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS): Document covering atherosclerotic disease of extracranial carotid and vertebral, mesenteric, renal, upper and lower extremity arteriesEndorsed by: the European Stroke Organization (ESO)The Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Peripheral Arterial Diseases of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and of the European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS).2017年欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)与欧洲血管外科学会(ESVS)合作制定的外周动脉疾病诊断和治疗指南:涵盖颅外颈动脉和椎动脉、肠系膜、肾、上肢和下肢动脉粥样硬化疾病的文件 认可机构:欧洲卒中组织(ESO) 欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)和欧洲血管外科学会(ESVS)外周动脉疾病诊断和治疗特别工作组
Eur Heart J. 2018 Mar 1;39(9):763-816. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx095.
9
ISAR-PEBIS (Paclitaxel-Eluting Balloon Versus Conventional Balloon Angioplasty for In-Stent Restenosis of Superficial Femoral Artery): A Randomized Trial.ISAR-PEBIS(紫杉醇洗脱球囊与传统球囊血管成形术治疗股浅动脉支架内再狭窄):一项随机试验。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2017 Jul 25;6(7):e006321. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.006321.
10
Paclitaxel-Eluting Balloon Versus Standard Balloon Angioplasty in In-Stent Restenosis of the Superficial Femoral and Proximal Popliteal Artery: 1-Year Results of the PACUBA Trial.紫杉醇洗脱球囊与标准球囊血管成形术治疗股浅动脉和腘动脉支架内再狭窄:PACUBA 试验 1 年结果。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Jul 11;9(13):1386-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.04.012.