• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

体外生命支持在急性心肌梗死合并心源性休克患者中的应用 - ECLS-SHOCK 试验的设计和原理。

Extracorporeal life support in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock - Design and rationale of the ECLS-SHOCK trial.

机构信息

Heart Center Leipzig at University of Leipzig and Leipzig Heart Institute, Leipzig, Germany.

Heart Center Leipzig at University of Leipzig and Leipzig Heart Institute, Leipzig, Germany.

出版信息

Am Heart J. 2021 Apr;234:1-11. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2021.01.002. Epub 2021 Jan 8.

DOI:10.1016/j.ahj.2021.01.002
PMID:33428901
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock the use of mechanical circulatory support devices remains controversial and data from randomized clinical trials are very limited. Extracorporeal life support (ECLS) - venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation - provides the strongest hemodynamic support in addition to oxygenation. However, despite increasing use it has not yet been properly investigated in randomized trials. Therefore, a prospective randomized adequately powered clinical trial is warranted.

STUDY DESIGN

The ECLS-SHOCK trial is a 420-patient controlled, international, multicenter, randomized, open-label trial. It is designed to compare whether treatment with ECLS in addition to early revascularization with percutaneous coronary intervention or alternatively coronary artery bypass grafting and optimal medical treatment is beneficial in comparison to no-ECLS in patients with severe infarct-related cardiogenic shock. Patients will be randomized in a 1:1 fashion to one of the two treatment arms. The primary efficacy endpoint of ECLS-SHOCK is 30-day mortality. Secondary outcome measures such as hemodynamic, laboratory, and clinical parameters will serve as surrogate endpoints for prognosis. Furthermore, a longer follow-up at 6 and 12 months will be performed including quality of life assessment. Safety endpoints include peripheral ischemic vascular complications, bleeding and stroke.

CONCLUSIONS

The ECLS-SHOCK trial will address essential questions of efficacy and safety of ECLS in addition to early revascularization in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock.

摘要

背景

在急性心肌梗死合并心源性休克的情况下,使用机械循环支持装置仍然存在争议,随机临床试验的数据非常有限。体外生命支持(ECLS)-静脉动脉体外膜氧合-除了提供氧气外,还提供最强的血液动力学支持。然而,尽管使用量不断增加,但它尚未在随机试验中得到适当的研究。因此,需要进行一项前瞻性、随机、充分有效、有力量的临床试验。

研究设计

ECLS-SHOCK 试验是一项 420 例患者对照、国际、多中心、随机、开放标签试验。它旨在比较在严重梗死相关心源性休克患者中,与不使用 ECLS 相比,在早期经皮冠状动脉介入治疗或替代冠状动脉旁路移植术和最佳药物治疗的基础上,加用 ECLS 是否有益。患者将以 1:1 的比例随机分配到两个治疗组之一。ECLS-SHOCK 的主要疗效终点是 30 天死亡率。血流动力学、实验室和临床参数等次要终点将作为预后的替代终点。此外,还将进行 6 个月和 12 个月的更长随访,包括生活质量评估。安全性终点包括外周缺血性血管并发症、出血和中风。

结论

ECLS-SHOCK 试验将解决在急性心肌梗死合并心源性休克的情况下,除了早期血运重建之外,ECLS 的疗效和安全性的重要问题。

相似文献

1
Extracorporeal life support in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock - Design and rationale of the ECLS-SHOCK trial.体外生命支持在急性心肌梗死合并心源性休克患者中的应用 - ECLS-SHOCK 试验的设计和原理。
Am Heart J. 2021 Apr;234:1-11. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2021.01.002. Epub 2021 Jan 8.
2
Outcome of patients treated with extracorporeal life support in cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction: 1-year result from the ECLS-Shock study.体外生命支持治疗并发急性心肌梗死后心源性休克患者的转归:ECLS-Shock 研究的 1 年结果。
Clin Res Cardiol. 2021 Sep;110(9):1412-1420. doi: 10.1007/s00392-020-01778-8. Epub 2020 Nov 12.
3
Multivessel versus culprit lesion only percutaneous revascularization plus potential staged revascularization in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: Design and rationale of CULPRIT-SHOCK trial.急性心肌梗死合并心源性休克患者多支血管与仅罪犯病变经皮血管重建加潜在分期血管重建:CULPRIT-SHOCK试验的设计与原理
Am Heart J. 2016 Feb;172:160-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2015.11.006. Epub 2015 Dec 1.
4
Culprit-Only Versus Immediate Multivessel Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicating Advanced Cardiogenic Shock Requiring Venoarterial-Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation.急性心肌梗合并需要静脉动脉体外膜肺氧合的晚期心源性休克患者中,罪犯血管血运重建与即刻多血管经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的比较。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2023 May 16;12(10):e029792. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.029792. Epub 2023 May 9.
5
Intraaortic balloon counterpulsation in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: design and rationale of the Intraaortic Balloon Pump in Cardiogenic Shock II (IABP-SHOCK II) trial.主动脉内球囊反搏在急性心肌梗死合并心源性休克中的应用:主动脉内球囊泵在心源性休克 II 期试验(IABP-SHOCK II)的设计和原理。
Am Heart J. 2012 Jun;163(6):938-45. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2012.03.012.
6
Extracorporeal Life Support in Infarct-Related Cardiogenic Shock.体外生命支持在与梗死相关的心原性休克中的应用。
N Engl J Med. 2023 Oct 5;389(14):1286-1297. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2307227. Epub 2023 Aug 26.
7
Extracorporeal life support in the multidisciplinary management of cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction.体外生命支持在急性心肌梗死后合并心原性休克的多学科综合管理中的应用。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Feb 15;95(3):E71-E77. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28316. Epub 2019 Apr 29.
8
Prognostic Impact of Admission Time in Infarct-Related Cardiogenic Shock: An ECLS-SHOCK Substudy.梗死相关性心原性休克患者入院时间对预后的影响:ECLS-SHOCK 亚研究。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2024 Oct 14;17(19):2228-2239. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2024.08.013.
9
Differential Prognostic Implications of Vasoactive Inotropic Score for Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock According to Use of Mechanical Circulatory Support.根据机械循环支持的使用情况,血管活性正性肌力评分对合并心源性休克的急性心肌梗死患者的预后影响的差异。
Crit Care Med. 2021 May 1;49(5):770-780. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004815.
10
Predictors of 30-day mortality and outcome in cases of myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock treated by extracorporeal life support.体外生命支持治疗伴心原性休克的心肌梗死患者 30 天死亡率及预后的预测因素。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2014 Jan;45(1):47-54. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezt207. Epub 2013 Apr 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Milrinone versus dobutamine in acute myocardial infarction-related cardiogenic shock; a propensity score matched analysis.米力农与多巴酚丁胺治疗急性心肌梗死相关心源性休克的倾向性评分匹配分析
Clin Res Cardiol. 2025 Sep 3. doi: 10.1007/s00392-025-02742-0.
2
Acute myocardial infarction with ventricular septal rupture: Clinical characteristics, prognosis factors, and treatment strategies.急性心肌梗死合并室间隔破裂:临床特征、预后因素及治疗策略
World J Cardiol. 2025 Jul 26;17(7):109787. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v17.i7.109787.
3
Early left ventricular unloading during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in cardiogenic shock: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
心源性休克体外膜肺氧合期间早期左心室减负:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
Artif Organs. 2025 Apr;49(4):556-570. doi: 10.1111/aor.14898. Epub 2024 Nov 4.
4
Long-term outcomes of cardiogenic shock and cardiac arrest complicating ST-elevation myocardial infarction according to timing of occurrence.根据发生时间,ST段抬高型心肌梗死并发心源性休克和心脏骤停的长期预后。
Eur Heart J Open. 2024 Sep 3;4(5):oeae075. doi: 10.1093/ehjopen/oeae075. eCollection 2024 Sep.
5
Review of Advancements in Managing Cardiogenic Shock: From Emergency Care Protocols to Long-Term Therapeutic Strategies.心源性休克管理进展综述:从急救方案到长期治疗策略
J Clin Med. 2024 Aug 16;13(16):4841. doi: 10.3390/jcm13164841.
6
Feasibility and Outcomes of a Cardiovascular Medicine Inclusive Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) Service.心血管内科综合体外膜肺氧合(ECMO)服务的可行性及结果
J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2024 Mar 22;3(6):101359. doi: 10.1016/j.jscai.2024.101359. eCollection 2024 Jun.
7
Management of cardiac emergencies in women: a clinical consensus statement of the Association for Acute CardioVascular Care (ACVC), the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI), the Heart Failure Association (HFA), and the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) of the ESC, and the ESC Working Group on Cardiovascular Pharmacotherapy.女性心脏急症的管理:欧洲心脏病学会急性心血管护理协会(ACVC)、欧洲经皮心血管介入协会(EAPCI)、心力衰竭协会(HFA)、欧洲心律协会(EHRA)以及欧洲心脏病学会心血管药物治疗工作组的临床共识声明
Eur Heart J Open. 2024 Feb 26;4(2):oeae011. doi: 10.1093/ehjopen/oeae011. eCollection 2024 Mar.
8
Sex-related differences in patients presenting with heart failure-related cardiogenic shock.心力衰竭相关性心原性休克患者的性别差异。
Clin Res Cardiol. 2024 Apr;113(4):612-625. doi: 10.1007/s00392-024-02392-8. Epub 2024 Feb 14.
9
Special Issue "Coronary Artery Disease Interventions".特刊“冠状动脉疾病干预措施”
J Clin Med. 2024 Jan 31;13(3):817. doi: 10.3390/jcm13030817.
10
Mechanical circulatory support for cardiogenic shock: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and propensity score-matched studies.心源性休克的机械循环支持:随机对照试验和倾向评分匹配研究的网状Meta分析
Intensive Care Med. 2024 Feb;50(2):209-221. doi: 10.1007/s00134-023-07278-3. Epub 2024 Jan 11.