Regional Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, United Kingdom.
Regional Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, United Kingdom,
Neonatology. 2020;117(6):742-749. doi: 10.1159/000512524. Epub 2021 Jan 11.
Apgar scoring in modern practice has extended beyond the original described remit by Virginia Apgar, including prognostication. Prognostic value of Apgar scoring in preterm populations is unsupported by robust evidence.
We aimed to identify the association between mortality or a composite mortality/major morbidity outcome in preterm infants with 1-min, 5-min, and sum 1 + 5-min Apgar scores.
Seven-year retrospective data was analysed on neonates born <32 weeks gestation in a regional neonatal centre. Co-primary outcomes were mortality and composite mortality/major morbidity. Adjusted odds ratios (aOR) were estimated using multivariable logistic regression analysis.
394 infants were included in the analysis. In neonates born <28 weeks gestation, no significant association was found between Apgar scores and the co-primary outcomes. In neonates born ≥28 weeks, low 1-min (aOR 10.452 [1.273, 85.835] for scores 4-6, 22.173 [2.666, 184.438] for scores 0-3), 5-min (4.724 [1.616, 13.806] for scores 4-6, 11.178 [1.803, 69.299] for scores 0-3), and sum 1 + 5-min Apgar scores (12.447 [2.674, 57.941] for scores 4-6, 55.960 [8.333, 375.804] for scores 0-3) were associated with significantly increased aOR of mortality. Increased aOR of composite mortality/major morbidity were also seen in neonates with moderately low (4-6) Apgar scores (aOR 3.104 [1.522, 6.328] for 1 min, 2.804 [1.406, 5.594] for 5 min, and 3.232 [1.769, 5.905] for 1 + 5 min).
Apgar scoring at 1 and 5 min has limited prognostic accuracy for extremely preterm infants but is prognostic in older infants. Sum Apgar scores, a measure of initial condition and response to resuscitation, may be a better predictor of mortality than individual scores.
在现代实践中,阿普加评分已经超出了弗吉尼亚·阿普加最初描述的范围,包括预测。阿普加评分在早产儿中的预后价值没有可靠的证据支持。
我们旨在确定 1 分钟、5 分钟和 1+5 分钟阿普加评分与早产儿死亡率或死亡率/主要发病率复合结局之间的关联。
对在一个地区新生儿中心出生的 <32 周妊娠的新生儿进行了为期 7 年的回顾性数据分析。主要结局为死亡率和死亡率/主要发病率复合结局。使用多变量逻辑回归分析估计调整后的优势比 (aOR)。
394 名婴儿被纳入分析。在出生 <28 周的新生儿中,阿普加评分与主要结局之间没有显著关联。在出生≥28 周的新生儿中,1 分钟时低评分(评分为 4-6 的 aOR 为 10.452 [1.273, 85.835],评分为 0-3 的 aOR 为 22.173 [2.666, 184.438])、5 分钟时低评分(评分为 4-6 的 aOR 为 4.724 [1.616, 13.806],评分为 0-3 的 aOR 为 11.178 [1.803, 69.299])和 1+5 分钟阿普加评分总和(评分为 4-6 的 aOR 为 12.447 [2.674, 57.941],评分为 0-3 的 aOR 为 55.960 [8.333, 375.804])与死亡率显著增加的 aOR 相关。中度低评分(4-6)的新生儿也出现了复合死亡率/主要发病率增加的 aOR(1 分钟时为 3.104 [1.522, 6.328],5 分钟时为 2.804 [1.406, 5.594],1+5 分钟时为 3.232 [1.769, 5.905])。
1 分钟和 5 分钟时的阿普加评分对极早产儿的预后准确性有限,但对年龄较大的婴儿具有预后意义。阿普加评分总和(1+5 分钟),作为初始状况和复苏反应的衡量标准,可能比单个评分更能预测死亡率。