Faculty of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.
Faculty of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.
J Orthop Sci. 2022 Mar;27(2):366-371. doi: 10.1016/j.jos.2020.12.015. Epub 2021 Jan 8.
Shoulder pain is a common symptom for non-traumatic shoulder pathologies and affects 4.7-66.7% of entire population. Even with the latest technological advantages, palpation still is a cost and time efficient tool to evaluate the shoulder pathologies. Our aim was to investigate and compare palpation findings in different shoulder pathologies.
We used first assessments of impingement syndrome (IS) (n = 205), rotator cuff tear (RCT) (n = 185) and frozen shoulder (FS) (n = 210) patients who received treatment between 2010 and 2019 years. Two experienced physiotherapists palpated predefined points: long head of biceps brachii, pectoralis minor, lateral intermuscular septum, proximal tendons of extensor group. These points categorized into "proximal", "mid-proximal", "mid-distal", "distal", "irregular". We also grouped patients by their BMIs.
We found RCT patients had higher BMI than IS and FS patients (p < 0.001, p = 0.001); more tender intermuscular septum points and night pain than IS patients (p = 0.001, p = 0.003) and more extensor group proximal tendon points than IS and FS patients (p < 0.001, p = 0.001). "No tenderness" group had lesser resting pain than distal group (p < 0.001) and lesser activity and night pain than middle-proximal, middle-distal, and distal groups (all ps < 0.002). Distal group had higher night pain than middle-proximal group (p = 0.003). Morbidly obese patients had higher night pain than normal and overweight patients (p = 0.003 and p = 0.009).
Tender point distribution varies depending on the pathology with biceps brachii being the most common. RCT patients had higher night pain related to more distal tender points. Patients with higher night pain had increased tenderness in septum intermuscular and extensor muscles' proximal tendons.
肩部疼痛是一种常见的非创伤性肩部疾病症状,影响了 4.7%至 66.7%的整个人群。即使有最新的技术优势,触诊仍然是一种评估肩部疾病的具有成本效益和时间效益的工具。我们的目的是研究和比较不同肩部疾病的触诊结果。
我们使用了 2010 年至 2019 年期间接受治疗的撞击综合征(IS)(n=205)、肩袖撕裂(RCT)(n=185)和冻结肩(FS)(n=210)患者的首次评估结果。两名经验丰富的物理治疗师触诊了预先确定的点:肱二头肌长头、胸小肌、外侧肌间隔、伸肌近端肌腱。这些点分为“近端”、“中近端”、“中远端”、“远端”和“不规则”。我们还根据患者的 BMI 将患者进行分组。
我们发现 RCT 患者的 BMI 高于 IS 和 FS 患者(p<0.001,p=0.001);与 IS 患者相比,他们的肌间隔点更敏感,夜间疼痛更多(p=0.001,p=0.003),并且伸肌近端肌腱点比 IS 和 FS 患者更多(p<0.001,p=0.001)。“无压痛”组的静息痛小于远端组(p<0.001),活动和夜间疼痛小于中近端、中远端和远端组(所有 p<0.002)。远端组夜间疼痛高于中近端组(p=0.003)。病态肥胖患者的夜间疼痛高于正常体重和超重患者(p=0.003 和 p=0.009)。
压痛点的分布因病变而异,最常见的是肱二头肌。RCT 患者夜间疼痛更高,与更远端的压痛点有关。夜间疼痛较高的患者在肌间隔和伸肌近端肌腱的压痛增加。