• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

初级保健中抑郁管理与严重程度预后的匹配:Target-D 随机对照试验的结果。

Matching depression management to severity prognosis in primary care: results of the Target-D randomised controlled trial.

机构信息

Department of General Practice, Melbourne Medical School, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.

Department of General Practice, Melbourne Medical School, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; professor of eHealth and primary care, Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, UK.

出版信息

Br J Gen Pract. 2021 Jan 28;71(703):e85-e94. doi: 10.3399/BJGP.2020.0783. Print 2021.

DOI:10.3399/BJGP.2020.0783
PMID:33431380
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7846356/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Mental health treatment rates are increasing, but the burden of disease has not reduced. Tools to support efficient resource distribution are required.

AIM

To investigate whether a person-centred e-health (Target-D) platform matching depression care to symptom severity prognosis can improve depressive symptoms relative to usual care.

DESIGN AND SETTING

Stratified individually randomised controlled trial in 14 general practices in Melbourne, Australia, from April 2016 to February 2019. In total, 1868 participants aged 18-65 years who had current depressive symptoms; internet access; no recent change to antidepressant; no current antipsychotic medication; and no current psychological therapy were randomised (1:1) via computer-generated allocation to intervention or usual care.

METHOD

The intervention was an e-health platform accessed in the GP waiting room, comprising symptom feedback, priority-setting, and prognosis-matched management options (online self-help, online guided psychological therapy, or nurse-led collaborative care). Management options were flexible, neither participants nor staff were blinded, and there were no substantive protocol deviations. The primary outcome was depressive symptom severity (9-item Patient Health Questionnaire [PHQ-9]) at 3 months.

RESULTS

In intention to treat analysis, estimated between- arm difference in mean PHQ-9 scores at 3 months was -0.88 (95% confidence interval [CI] = -1.45 to -0.31) favouring the intervention, and -0.59 at 12 months (95% CI = -1.18 to 0.01); standardised effect sizes of -0.16 (95% CI = -0.26 to -0.05) and -0.10 (95% CI = -0.21 to 0.002), respectively. No serious adverse events were reported.

CONCLUSION

Matching management to prognosis using a person-centred e-health platform improves depressive symptoms at 3 months compared to usual care and could feasibly be implemented at scale. Scope exists to enhance the uptake of management options.

摘要

背景

精神卫生治疗率正在上升,但疾病负担并未减轻。需要有工具来支持有效的资源分配。

目的

研究以症状严重程度预后为导向的以人为本的电子健康(Target-D)平台是否可以改善抑郁症状,与常规护理相比。

设计和设置

2016 年 4 月至 2019 年 2 月,在澳大利亚墨尔本的 14 家普通诊所进行分层个体随机对照试验。共有 1868 名年龄在 18-65 岁之间、有当前抑郁症状、有互联网接入、最近未改变抗抑郁药、无当前抗精神病药、无当前心理治疗的参与者被随机(1:1)通过计算机生成的分配到干预组或常规护理组。

方法

干预措施是在全科医生候诊室使用电子健康平台,包括症状反馈、优先级设置和预后匹配的管理选项(在线自助、在线引导心理治疗或护士主导的协作护理)。管理选项具有灵活性,参与者和工作人员均未被蒙蔽,也没有实质性的方案偏离。主要结局是 3 个月时的抑郁症状严重程度(9 项患者健康问卷 [PHQ-9])。

结果

在意向治疗分析中,估计 3 个月时手臂间平均 PHQ-9 评分的差值为-0.88(95%置信区间 [CI] = -1.45 至 -0.31),有利于干预,12 个月时为-0.59(95%CI = -1.18 至 0.01);标准化效应大小分别为-0.16(95%CI = -0.26 至 -0.05)和-0.10(95%CI = -0.21 至 0.002)。未报告严重不良事件。

结论

使用以人为本的电子健康平台根据预后匹配管理可改善 3 个月时的抑郁症状,与常规护理相比,且在规模上可能可行。存在增强管理选择的接受度的空间。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6528/7846356/2f8380c0df72/bjgpfeb-2021-71-703-e85-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6528/7846356/038fbd9e360b/bjgpfeb-2021-71-703-e85-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6528/7846356/2f8380c0df72/bjgpfeb-2021-71-703-e85-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6528/7846356/038fbd9e360b/bjgpfeb-2021-71-703-e85-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6528/7846356/2f8380c0df72/bjgpfeb-2021-71-703-e85-2.jpg

相似文献

1
Matching depression management to severity prognosis in primary care: results of the Target-D randomised controlled trial.初级保健中抑郁管理与严重程度预后的匹配:Target-D 随机对照试验的结果。
Br J Gen Pract. 2021 Jan 28;71(703):e85-e94. doi: 10.3399/BJGP.2020.0783. Print 2021.
2
Clinical efficacy of a Decision Support Tool (Link-me) to guide intensity of mental health care in primary practice: a pragmatic stratified randomised controlled trial.决策支持工具(Link-me)引导基层医疗中心精神卫生保健强度的临床疗效:一项实用分层随机对照试验。
Lancet Psychiatry. 2021 Mar;8(3):202-214. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30517-4. Epub 2021 Feb 8.
3
Target-D: a stratified individually randomized controlled trial of the diamond clinical prediction tool to triage and target treatment for depressive symptoms in general practice: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.目标-D:一项关于钻石临床预测工具在基层医疗中对抑郁症状进行分类和靶向治疗的分层个体随机对照试验:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2017 Jul 20;18(1):342. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2089-y.
4
The second Randomised Evaluation of the Effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and Acceptability of Computerised Therapy (REEACT-2) trial: does the provision of telephone support enhance the effectiveness of computer-delivered cognitive behaviour therapy? A randomised controlled trial.第二项计算机化治疗的有效性、成本效益及可接受性随机评估(REEACT - 2)试验:提供电话支持能否提高计算机辅助认知行为疗法的有效性?一项随机对照试验。
Health Technol Assess. 2016 Nov;20(89):1-64. doi: 10.3310/hta20890.
5
A randomised controlled trial of computerised cognitive behaviour therapy for the treatment of depression in primary care: the Randomised Evaluation of the Effectiveness and Acceptability of Computerised Therapy (REEACT) trial.一项关于初级保健中使用计算机化认知行为疗法治疗抑郁症的随机对照试验:计算机化疗法有效性和可接受性随机评估(REEACT)试验。
Health Technol Assess. 2015 Dec;19(101):viii, xxi-171. doi: 10.3310/hta191010.
6
Model of integrated mental health video consultations for people with depression or anxiety in primary care (PROVIDE-C): assessor masked, multicentre, randomised controlled trial.综合心理健康视频咨询模式用于初级保健中的抑郁或焦虑患者(PROVIDE-C):评估者设盲,多中心,随机对照试验。
BMJ. 2024 Sep 25;386:e079921. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2024-079921.
7
Collaborative nurse-led self-management support for primary care patients with anxiety, depressive or somatic symptoms: Cluster-randomised controlled trial (findings of the SMADS study).协作式护士主导的初级保健患者焦虑、抑郁或躯体症状的自我管理支持:集群随机对照试验(SMADS 研究结果)。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2016 Nov;63:101-111. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2016.08.007. Epub 2016 Aug 21.
8
CollAborative care and active surveillance for Screen-Positive EldeRs with subthreshold depression (CASPER): a multicentred randomised controlled trial of clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness.针对筛查呈阳性的亚阈值抑郁症老年患者的协作护理与主动监测(CASPER):一项关于临床有效性和成本效益的多中心随机对照试验
Health Technol Assess. 2017 Feb;21(8):1-196. doi: 10.3310/hta21080.
9
CollAborative care for Screen-Positive EldeRs with major depression (CASPER plus): a multicentred randomised controlled trial of clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness.伴有重度抑郁症的 Screen-Positive 老年人的协作式护理(CASPER plus):一项针对临床效果和成本效益的多中心随机对照试验。
Health Technol Assess. 2017 Nov;21(67):1-252. doi: 10.3310/hta21670.
10
Integrated primary care for patients with mental and physical multimorbidity: cluster randomised controlled trial of collaborative care for patients with depression comorbid with diabetes or cardiovascular disease.针对患有精神和身体多种疾病的患者的综合初级保健:抑郁症合并糖尿病或心血管疾病患者协作护理的整群随机对照试验。
BMJ. 2015 Feb 16;350:h638. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h638.

引用本文的文献

1
The Value of Clinical Prediction Models in General Practice: A Qualitative Study Exploring the Perspectives of People With Lived Experience of Depression and General Practitioners.临床预测模型在全科医疗中的价值:一项探索抑郁症患者和全科医生观点的定性研究
Health Expect. 2024 Dec;27(6):e70059. doi: 10.1111/hex.70059.
2
Matching depression management to severity prognosis in primary care: remaining questions.基层医疗中抑郁症管理与严重程度预后的匹配:尚存问题
Br J Gen Pract. 2024 Jun 27;74(744):297. doi: 10.3399/bjgp24X738537. Print 2024 Jul.
3
The PRESIDE (PhaRmacogEnomicS In DEpression) Trial: a double-blind randomised controlled trial of pharmacogenomic-informed prescribing of antidepressants on depression outcomes in patients with major depressive disorder in primary care.

本文引用的文献

1
Economic evaluation of the Target-D platform to match depression management to severity prognosis in primary care: A within-trial cost-utility analysis.经济评估 Target-D 平台在初级保健中根据严重程度预测匹配抑郁管理的效果:一项试验内成本效益分析。
PLoS One. 2022 May 25;17(5):e0268948. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0268948. eCollection 2022.
2
The COVID-19 pandemic: The 'black swan' for mental health care and a turning point for e-health.新冠疫情:心理健康护理的“黑天鹅”与电子健康的转折点。
Internet Interv. 2020 Apr;20:100317. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2020.100317. Epub 2020 Mar 19.
3
The Challenges of Improving Treatments for Depression.
PRESIDE(抑郁的药物基因组学研究)试验:一项在初级保健中针对主要抑郁障碍患者进行基于药物基因组学的抗抑郁药物处方的双盲随机对照试验,以评估其对抑郁结局的影响。
Trials. 2023 May 19;24(1):342. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07361-6.
4
Acceptability and Potential Impact of the #chatsafe Suicide Postvention Response Among Young People Who Have Been Exposed to Suicide: Pilot Study.#chatsafe自杀后干预措施在遭受过自杀事件的年轻人中的可接受性及潜在影响:试点研究
JMIR Hum Factors. 2023 May 19;10:e44535. doi: 10.2196/44535.
5
Guided Internet-Delivered Treatment for Depression: Scoping Review.抑郁症的互联网引导式治疗:范围综述。
JMIR Ment Health. 2022 Oct 4;9(10):e37342. doi: 10.2196/37342.
6
Economic evaluation of the Target-D platform to match depression management to severity prognosis in primary care: A within-trial cost-utility analysis.经济评估 Target-D 平台在初级保健中根据严重程度预测匹配抑郁管理的效果:一项试验内成本效益分析。
PLoS One. 2022 May 25;17(5):e0268948. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0268948. eCollection 2022.
7
Web-Based Interventions to Help Australian Adults Address Depression, Anxiety, Suicidal Ideation, and General Mental Well-being: Scoping Review.基于网络的干预措施对澳大利亚成年人应对抑郁、焦虑、自杀意念及总体心理健康的作用:范围综述
JMIR Ment Health. 2022 Feb 8;9(2):e31018. doi: 10.2196/31018.
8
Mental Health Screening in General Practices as a Means for Enhancing Uptake of Digital Mental Health Interventions: Observational Cohort Study.综合实践中的精神健康筛查作为增强数字精神健康干预措施利用率的手段:观察性队列研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Sep 16;23(9):e28369. doi: 10.2196/28369.
改善抑郁症治疗方法面临的挑战。
JAMA. 2018 Dec 25;320(24):2529-2530. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.17824.
4
Nurse-delivered interventions for mental health in primary care: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.初级保健中护士提供的心理健康干预措施:随机对照试验的系统评价
Fam Pract. 2019 Jan 25;36(1):64-71. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmy101.
5
Guideline-based stepped and collaborative care for patients with depression in a cluster-randomised trial.基于指南的阶梯式和协作式护理在一项集群随机试验中对抑郁症患者的效果。
Sci Rep. 2018 Jun 20;8(1):9389. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-27470-6.
6
Development of a prognostic model for predicting depression severity in adult primary patients with depressive symptoms using the diamond longitudinal study.利用钻石纵向研究开发预测成年原发性抑郁症状患者抑郁严重程度的预后模型。
J Affect Disord. 2018 Feb;227:854-860. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2017.11.042. Epub 2017 Nov 13.
7
Development of a Mobile Clinical Prediction Tool to Estimate Future Depression Severity and Guide Treatment in Primary Care: User-Centered Design.开发一种移动临床预测工具以评估未来抑郁症严重程度并指导初级保健中的治疗:以用户为中心的设计
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2018 Apr 23;6(4):e95. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.9502.
8
Improving Implementation of eMental Health for Mood Disorders in Routine Practice: Systematic Review of Barriers and Facilitating Factors.改善日常实践中情绪障碍电子心理健康的实施:障碍与促进因素的系统评价
JMIR Ment Health. 2018 Mar 16;5(1):e20. doi: 10.2196/mental.9769.
9
Comparative efficacy and acceptability of 21 antidepressant drugs for the acute treatment of adults with major depressive disorder: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.21 种抗抑郁药治疗成人重度抑郁症的急性治疗的疗效和可接受性比较:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Lancet. 2018 Apr 7;391(10128):1357-1366. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32802-7. Epub 2018 Feb 21.
10
A Solution-Focused Research Approach to Achieve an Implementable Revolution in Digital Mental Health.一种以解决问题为导向的研究方法,以实现数字心理健康领域切实可行的变革。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2018 Feb 1;75(2):113-114. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2017.3838.