Department of Psychiatry, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA, USA.
Department of Neuropsychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Tottori University, Yonago, Japan.
Sci Rep. 2021 Jan 11;11(1):304. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-79391-y.
Current methods for screening and detecting delirium are not practical in clinical settings. We previously showed that a simplified EEG with bispectral electroencephalography (BSEEG) algorithm can detect delirium in elderly inpatients. In this study, we performed a post-hoc BSEEG data analysis using larger sample size and performed topological data analysis to improve the BSEEG method. Data from 274 subjects included in the previous study were analyzed as a 1st cohort. Subjects were enrolled at the University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics (UIHC) between January 30, 2016, and October 30, 2017. A second cohort with 265 subjects was recruited between January 16, 2019, and August 19, 2019. The BSEEG score was calculated as a power ratio between low frequency to high frequency using our newly developed algorithm. Additionally, Topological data analysis (TDA) score was calculated by applying TDA to our EEG data. The BSEEG score and TDA score were compared between those patients with delirium and without delirium. Among the 274 subjects from the first cohort, 102 were categorized as delirious. Among the 206 subjects from the second cohort, 42 were categorized as delirious. The areas under the curve (AUCs) based on BSEEG score were 0.72 (1st cohort, Fp1-A1), 0.76 (1st cohort, Fp2-A2), and 0.67 (2nd cohort). AUCs from TDA were much higher at 0.82 (1st cohort, Fp1-A1), 0.84 (1st cohort, Fp2-A2), and 0.78 (2nd cohort). When sensitivity was set to be 0.80, the TDA drastically improved specificity to 0.66 (1st cohort, Fp1-A1), 0.72 (1st cohort, Fp2-A2), and 0.62 (2nd cohort), compared to 0.48 (1st cohort, Fp1-A1), 0.54 (1st cohort, Fp2-A2), and 0.46 (2nd cohort) with BSEEG. BSEEG has the potential to detect delirium, and TDA is helpful to improve the performance.
目前用于筛查和检测谵妄的方法在临床环境中并不实用。我们之前曾表明,使用双谱脑电图(BSEEG)算法的简化脑电图可以检测老年住院患者的谵妄。在这项研究中,我们使用更大的样本量进行了事后 BSEEG 数据分析,并进行了拓扑数据分析以改进 BSEEG 方法。先前研究中包含的 274 名受试者的数据被分析为第 1 队列。受试者于 2016 年 1 月 30 日至 2017 年 10 月 30 日在爱荷华大学医院和诊所(UIHC)招募。第二队列包括 265 名受试者,于 2019 年 1 月 16 日至 2019 年 8 月 19 日招募。BSEEG 评分是使用我们新开发的算法计算低频与高频之间的功率比得出的。此外,还通过对 EEG 数据进行拓扑数据分析(TDA)计算了 TDA 评分。比较了有谵妄和无谵妄的患者的 BSEEG 评分和 TDA 评分。在第一队列的 274 名受试者中,有 102 名被归类为谵妄。在第二队列的 206 名受试者中,有 42 名被归类为谵妄。基于 BSEEG 评分的曲线下面积(AUC)分别为 0.72(第 1 队列,Fp1-A1)、0.76(第 1 队列,Fp2-A2)和 0.67(第 2 队列)。基于 TDA 的 AUC 高得多,分别为 0.82(第 1 队列,Fp1-A1)、0.84(第 1 队列,Fp2-A2)和 0.78(第 2 队列)。当灵敏度设定为 0.80 时,与 BSEEG 相比,TDA 将特异性提高到 0.66(第 1 队列,Fp1-A1)、0.72(第 1 队列,Fp2-A2)和 0.62(第 2 队列),而 BSEEG 的特异性分别为 0.48(第 1 队列,Fp1-A1)、0.54(第 1 队列,Fp2-A2)和 0.46(第 2 队列)。BSEEG 有可能检测到谵妄,而 TDA 有助于提高性能。