• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[食管癌微创肿瘤手术的证据]

[Evidence in minimally invasive oncological surgery of the esophagus].

作者信息

Babic B, Schiffmann L M, Schröder W, Bruns C J, Fuchs H F

机构信息

Klinik und Poliklinik für Allgemein‑, Viszeral‑, Tumor- und Transplantationschirurgie, Uniklinik Köln, Kerpener Straße 62, 50937, Köln, Deutschland.

出版信息

Chirurg. 2021 Apr;92(4):299-303. doi: 10.1007/s00104-020-01337-x. Epub 2021 Jan 11.

DOI:10.1007/s00104-020-01337-x
PMID:33432385
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Thoracoabdominal esophagectomy still plays a major role in the oncological treatment for esophageal cancer. Minimally invasive procedures were developed to reduce the high rate of postoperative morbidity and mortality without negatively affecting the oncological outcome.

OBJECTIVE

What evidence supports minimally invasive oncological surgery of the esophagus? Do patients benefit from minimally invasive esophagectomy compared to an open approach? Is the reduction of surgical access trauma specifically advantageous?

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Review, evaluation and critical analysis of the international literature.

RESULTS

A reduction in postoperative morbidity by decreasing surgical trauma was confirmed by three prospective randomized clinical trials, while showing at least similar oncological outcomes. Diverse retrospective analyses and meta-analyses also came to the same result.

CONCLUSION

A minimization of surgical access trauma during thoracoabdominal esophagectomy reduces postoperative morbidity compared to conventional open surgery. Recent evidence suggests that oncological outcomes are not altered depending on the surgical approach.

摘要

背景

胸腹联合食管癌切除术在食管癌的肿瘤治疗中仍发挥着重要作用。微创技术的发展旨在降低术后高发病率和死亡率,同时不负面影响肿瘤治疗效果。

目的

有哪些证据支持食管微创肿瘤手术?与开放手术相比,患者是否能从微创食管切除术中获益?手术入路创伤的减少是否具有特别的优势?

材料与方法

对国际文献进行综述、评估和批判性分析。

结果

三项前瞻性随机临床试验证实,通过减少手术创伤可降低术后发病率,同时显示出至少相似的肿瘤治疗效果。各种回顾性分析和荟萃分析也得出了相同的结果。

结论

与传统开放手术相比,胸腹联合食管癌切除术中手术入路创伤的最小化可降低术后发病率。最新证据表明,肿瘤治疗效果不会因手术方式而异。

相似文献

1
[Evidence in minimally invasive oncological surgery of the esophagus].[食管癌微创肿瘤手术的证据]
Chirurg. 2021 Apr;92(4):299-303. doi: 10.1007/s00104-020-01337-x. Epub 2021 Jan 11.
2
[Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer].[食管癌的微创食管切除术]
Ther Umsch. 2022 Apr;79(3-4):181-187. doi: 10.1024/0040-5930/a001346.
3
[Evidence base for minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer].[食管癌微创食管切除术的循证医学依据]
Chirurg. 2014 Aug;85(8):668-74. doi: 10.1007/s00104-014-2754-6.
4
Is minimally invasive surgery beneficial in the management of esophageal cancer? A meta-analysis.微创外科治疗食管癌是否有益?一项荟萃分析。
Surg Endosc. 2010 Jul;24(7):1621-9. doi: 10.1007/s00464-009-0822-7. Epub 2010 Jan 28.
5
Robot-assisted esophagectomy (RAE) versus conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) for resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: protocol for a multicenter prospective randomized controlled trial (RAMIE trial, robot-assisted minimally invasive Esophagectomy).机器人辅助食管切除术(RAE)与传统微创食管切除术(MIE)治疗可切除的食管鳞癌:一项多中心前瞻性随机对照试验的方案(RAMIE 试验,机器人辅助微创食管切除术)。
BMC Cancer. 2019 Jun 21;19(1):608. doi: 10.1186/s12885-019-5799-6.
6
Long-term oncological outcomes following completely minimally invasive esophagectomy versus open esophagectomy.完全微创食管切除术与开放食管切除术的长期肿瘤学结果。
Dis Esophagus. 2020 Jun 15;33(6). doi: 10.1093/dote/doz113.
7
Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Cancer: Single Center Experience after 44 Consecutive Cases.微创食管癌切除术治疗癌症:连续44例单中心经验
Srp Arh Celok Lek. 2015 Jul-Aug;143(7-8):410-5. doi: 10.2298/sarh1508410b.
8
Minimally invasive esophagectomy: clinical evidence and surgical techniques.微创食管切除术:临床证据与手术技术。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2020 Dec;405(8):1061-1067. doi: 10.1007/s00423-020-02003-w. Epub 2020 Oct 7.
9
Recent Advances in Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy.微创食管切除术的最新进展
Chirurgia (Bucur). 2018 Jan-Feb;113(1):19-37. doi: 10.21614/chirurgia.113.1.19.
10
The implementation of minimally-invasive esophagectomy does not impact short-term outcome in a high-volume center.在高容量中心,微创食管切除术的实施并不影响短期结果。
Anticancer Res. 2013 May;33(5):2085-91.

引用本文的文献

1
Total RAMIE with three-field lymph node dissection by a simultaneous two-team approach using a new docking method for esophageal cancer.全直肠系膜切除联合三野淋巴结清扫的同期双团队操作方法用于食管癌治疗
Surg Endosc. 2024 Sep;38(9):4887-4893. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11001-8. Epub 2024 Jul 2.
2
Hybrid laparoscopic versus fully robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy: an international propensity-score matched analysis of perioperative outcome.杂交腹腔镜与全机器人辅助微创食管切除术:围手术期结局的国际倾向评分匹配分析。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Jun;37(6):4466-4477. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-09911-0. Epub 2023 Feb 17.

本文引用的文献

1
Laparoscopically assisted versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer-the Randomised Oesophagectomy: Minimally Invasive or Open (ROMIO) study: protocol for a randomised controlled trial (RCT).腹腔镜辅助与开放性食管癌切除术治疗食管癌患者的随机对照试验(ROMIO 研究):方案设计
BMJ Open. 2019 Nov 19;9(11):e030907. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030907.
2
Anastomotic Techniques and Associated Morbidity in Total Minimally Invasive Transthoracic Esophagectomy: Results From the EsoBenchmark Database.全胸腔镜微创食管切除术的吻合技术及相关并发症:来自 EsoBenchmark 数据库的结果。
Ann Surg. 2019 Nov;270(5):820-826. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003538.
3
Preoperative CT versus intraoperative hybrid DynaCT imaging for localization of small pulmonary nodules: a randomized controlled trial.
术前 CT 与术中杂交 DynaCT 成像定位小肺结节:一项随机对照试验。
Trials. 2019 Jul 4;20(1):400. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3532-z.
4
Hybrid Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer.杂交微创食管癌切除术。
N Engl J Med. 2019 Jan 10;380(2):152-162. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1805101.
5
Robot-assisted Minimally Invasive Thoracolaparoscopic Esophagectomy Versus Open Transthoracic Esophagectomy for Resectable Esophageal Cancer: A Randomized Controlled Trial.机器人辅助微创胸腹腔镜食管切除术与开胸经胸食管癌切除术治疗可切除食管癌的随机对照试验。
Ann Surg. 2019 Apr;269(4):621-630. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003031.
6
Benchmarking Complications Associated with Esophagectomy.食管癌切除术相关并发症的基准测试。
Ann Surg. 2019 Feb;269(2):291-298. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002611.
7
Defining Benchmarks for Transthoracic Esophagectomy: A Multicenter Analysis of Total Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy in Low Risk Patients.定义胸腔镜食管切除术的基准:低危患者完全微创食管切除术的多中心分析。
Ann Surg. 2017 Nov;266(5):814-821. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002445.
8
Oesophageal cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up.食管癌:ESMO 诊断、治疗及随访临床实践指南
Ann Oncol. 2016 Sep;27(suppl 5):v50-v57. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdw329.
9
Mortality after esophagectomy is heavily impacted by center volume: retrospective analysis of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample.食管癌切除术后死亡率受中心手术量的严重影响:全国住院患者样本的回顾性分析
Surg Endosc. 2017 Jun;31(6):2491-2497. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5251-9. Epub 2016 Sep 22.
10
A randomized Phase III trial of thoracoscopic versus open esophagectomy for thoracic esophageal cancer: Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study JCOG1409.一项比较胸腔镜与开放食管切除术治疗胸段食管癌的随机III期试验:日本临床肿瘤学会研究JCOG1409。
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2016 Feb;46(2):174-7. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyv178. Epub 2016 Jan 4.