• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

微创食管切除术:临床证据与手术技术。

Minimally invasive esophagectomy: clinical evidence and surgical techniques.

机构信息

Klinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral und Transplantationschirurgie, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany.

出版信息

Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2020 Dec;405(8):1061-1067. doi: 10.1007/s00423-020-02003-w. Epub 2020 Oct 7.

DOI:10.1007/s00423-020-02003-w
PMID:33026466
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7686170/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Surgical esophagectomy plays a crucial role in the curative and palliative treatment of esophageal cancer. Thereby, minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) is increasingly applied all over the world. Combining minimal invasiveness with improved possibilities for meticulous dissection, robot-assisted minimal invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) has been implemented in many centers.

PURPOSE

This review focuses on the development of MIE as well as RAMIE and their value based on evidence in current literature.

CONCLUSION

Although MIE and RAMIE are highly complex procedures, they can be performed safely with improved postoperative outcome and equal oncological results compared with open esophagectomy (OE). RAMIE offers additional advantages regarding surgical dissection, lymphadenectomy, and extended indications for advanced tumors.

摘要

背景

外科食管切除术在食管癌的根治性和姑息性治疗中起着关键作用。因此,微创食管切除术(MIE)在全球范围内得到了越来越多的应用。机器人辅助微创食管切除术(RAMIE)将微创与精细解剖的改进可能性相结合,已在许多中心实施。

目的

本综述重点介绍 MIE 和 RAMIE 的发展及其在现有文献证据基础上的价值。

结论

尽管 MIE 和 RAMIE 是非常复杂的手术,但与开放性食管切除术(OE)相比,它们可以安全地进行,并且具有改善的术后结果和相同的肿瘤学结果。RAMIE 在手术解剖、淋巴结清扫和晚期肿瘤的扩展适应证方面具有额外的优势。

相似文献

1
Minimally invasive esophagectomy: clinical evidence and surgical techniques.微创食管切除术:临床证据与手术技术。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2020 Dec;405(8):1061-1067. doi: 10.1007/s00423-020-02003-w. Epub 2020 Oct 7.
2
Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) compared to conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) for esophageal cancer: a propensity-matched analysis.机器人辅助微创食管切除术(RAMIE)与传统微创食管切除术(MIE)治疗食管癌的比较:倾向评分匹配分析。
Dis Esophagus. 2020 Apr 15;33(4). doi: 10.1093/dote/doz060.
3
Robot-assisted minimally invasive thoraco-laparoscopic esophagectomy versus minimally invasive esophagectomy for resectable esophageal adenocarcinoma, a randomized controlled trial (ROBOT-2 trial).机器人辅助微创胸腹腔镜食管切除术与微创食管切除术治疗可切除食管腺癌的随机对照试验(ROBOT-2 试验)。
BMC Cancer. 2021 Sep 26;21(1):1060. doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-08780-x.
4
Does robot-assisted minimally invasive oesophagectomy have superiority over thoraco-laparoscopic minimally invasive oesophagectomy in lymph node dissection?机器人辅助微创食管切除术在淋巴结清扫方面是否优于胸腹腔镜微创食管切除术?
Dis Esophagus. 2021 Feb 10;34(2). doi: 10.1093/dote/doaa050.
5
Short-term outcomes of robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy with extended lymphadenectomy for esophageal cancer compared with video-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy: A single-center retrospective study.机器人辅助微创食管癌根治术与电视辅助微创食管癌根治术治疗食管癌的短期疗效比较:一项单中心回顾性研究。
Asian J Endosc Surg. 2022 Apr;15(2):270-278. doi: 10.1111/ases.12992. Epub 2021 Oct 12.
6
Does robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy really have the advantage of lymphadenectomy over video-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy in treating esophageal squamous cell carcinoma? A propensity score-matched analysis based on short-term outcomes.机器人辅助微创食管切除术在治疗食管鳞癌方面真的比电视辅助微创食管切除术具有淋巴结清扫优势吗?基于短期结果的倾向评分匹配分析。
Dis Esophagus. 2019 Jul 1;32(7). doi: 10.1093/dote/doy110.
7
Robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy versus the conventional minimally invasive one: A meta-analysis and systematic review.机器人辅助微创食管切除术与传统微创食管切除术的比较:一项荟萃分析与系统评价
Int J Med Robot. 2019 Jun;15(3):e1988. doi: 10.1002/rcs.1988. Epub 2019 Feb 22.
8
Robot-assisted and conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy are associated with better postoperative results compared to hybrid and open transthoracic esophagectomy.机器人辅助和传统的微创食管切除术与杂交和开胸经胸食管切除术相比,具有更好的术后结果。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2022 Apr;48(4):776-782. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2021.11.121. Epub 2021 Nov 19.
9
Initial introduction of robot-assisted, minimally invasive esophagectomy using the microanatomy-based concept in the upper mediastinum.机器人辅助微创食管切除术的初步介绍,采用基于中上纵隔显微解剖学的概念。
Surg Endosc. 2021 Dec;35(12):6568-6576. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-08154-7. Epub 2020 Nov 10.
10
Robot assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) for esophageal cancer.机器人辅助微创食管切除术(RAMIE)治疗食管癌。
Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2018 Oct-Dec;36-37:81-83. doi: 10.1016/j.bpg.2018.11.004. Epub 2018 Nov 29.

引用本文的文献

1
The Role of Methadone in Postoperative Analgesia in Esophagectomy Patients-A Retrospective Study.美沙酮在食管癌切除术后镇痛中的作用——一项回顾性研究
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Aug 29;13(17):2153. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13172153.
2
Optimizing Perioperative Care in Esophageal Surgery: The EUropean PErioperative MEdical Networking (EUPEMEN) Collaborative for Esophagectomy.优化食管癌手术围手术期护理:欧洲围手术期医学网络(EUPEMEN)食管癌切除术协作组
Diseases. 2025 Jul 22;13(8):231. doi: 10.3390/diseases13080231.
3
Surgical Timing and Outcomes in Esophageal Cancer: Insights from One- and Two-Stage Esophagectomies in a Polish Cohort.食管癌的手术时机与预后:波兰队列中一期和二期食管切除术的见解
J Clin Med. 2025 Jun 17;14(12):4301. doi: 10.3390/jcm14124301.
4
Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy: Current Best Practice.机器人辅助微创食管切除术:当前最佳实践
Dig Surg. 2025 Jun 5:1-9. doi: 10.1159/000546749.
5
Single-Port Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy Using the Single-Port Robotic System via the Subcostal Approach: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.经肋下入路使用单孔机器人系统行单孔机器人辅助微创食管切除术:单中心回顾性研究
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Mar 21;17(7):1052. doi: 10.3390/cancers17071052.
6
The Current State of Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy (RAMIE): Outcomes from the Upper GI International Robotic Association (UGIRA) Esophageal Registry.机器人辅助微创食管切除术(RAMIE)的现状:来自上消化道国际机器人协会(UGIRA)食管登记处的结果。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2025 Feb;32(2):823-833. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-16364-9. Epub 2024 Nov 4.
7
A systematic review and meta-analysis of thoracic epidural analgesia versus other analgesic techniques in patients post-oesophagectomy.食管癌切除术后患者胸段硬膜外镇痛与其他镇痛技术的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Perioper Med (Lond). 2024 Jul 23;13(1):80. doi: 10.1186/s13741-024-00437-0.
8
Analgesia in esophagectomy: a narrative review.食管癌切除术中的镇痛:一篇叙述性综述。
J Thorac Dis. 2023 Sep 28;15(9):5099-5111. doi: 10.21037/jtd-23-241. Epub 2023 Sep 1.
9
Factors Influencing Postoperative Complications Following Minimally Invasive Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy: A Retrospective Cohort Study.影响微创Ivor Lewis食管癌切除术后并发症的因素:一项回顾性队列研究
J Clin Med. 2023 Aug 31;12(17):5688. doi: 10.3390/jcm12175688.
10
Drainless robot-assisted minimally invasive oesophagectomy-randomized controlled trial (RESPECT).无引流管机器人辅助微创食管切除术随机对照试验(RESPECT)。
Trials. 2023 May 2;24(1):303. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07233-z.

本文引用的文献

1
Hybrid Minimally-invasive Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: Clinical and Oncological Outcomes.杂交微创食管癌切除术治疗食管癌:临床和肿瘤学结果。
Anticancer Res. 2020 Mar;40(3):1753-1758. doi: 10.21873/anticanres.14129.
2
Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy with Intrathoracic Anastomosis (Ivor Lewis): Promising Results in 100 Consecutive Patients (the European Experience).机器人辅助微创经胸食管切除术(Ivor Lewis):100 例连续患者的良好结果(欧洲经验)。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2021 Jan;25(1):1-8. doi: 10.1007/s11605-019-04510-8. Epub 2020 Feb 18.
3
Health-related Quality of Life Following Hybrid Minimally Invasive Versus Open Esophagectomy for Patients With Esophageal Cancer, Analysis of a Multicenter, Open-label, Randomized Phase III Controlled Trial: The MIRO Trial.混合微创与开放食管切除术治疗食管癌患者的健康相关生活质量:多中心、开放标签、随机 III 期对照临床试验分析:MIRO 试验。
Ann Surg. 2020 Jun;271(6):1023-1029. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003559.
4
Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) compared to conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) for esophageal cancer: a propensity-matched analysis.机器人辅助微创食管切除术(RAMIE)与传统微创食管切除术(MIE)治疗食管癌的比较:倾向评分匹配分析。
Dis Esophagus. 2020 Apr 15;33(4). doi: 10.1093/dote/doz060.
5
Robotic-assisted Esophagectomy vs Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Esophagectomy (REVATE): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.机器人辅助食管切除术与电视辅助胸腔镜食管切除术(REVATE):一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2019 Jun 10;20(1):346. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3441-1.
6
Early Quality of Life Outcomes After Robotic-Assisted Minimally Invasive and Open Esophagectomy.机器人辅助微创与开放食管切除术的早期生活质量结局。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2019 Sep;108(3):920-928. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2018.11.075. Epub 2019 Apr 23.
7
Early Outcomes of Robot-Assisted Versus Thoracoscopic-Assisted Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: A Propensity Score-Matched Study.机器人辅助与胸腔镜辅助 Ivor Lewis 食管癌根治术的早期结果:倾向评分匹配研究。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2019 May;26(5):1284-1291. doi: 10.1245/s10434-019-07273-3. Epub 2019 Mar 6.
8
Hybrid Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer.杂交微创食管癌切除术。
N Engl J Med. 2019 Jan 10;380(2):152-162. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1805101.
9
Robot-assisted Minimally Invasive Thoracolaparoscopic Esophagectomy Versus Open Transthoracic Esophagectomy for Resectable Esophageal Cancer: A Randomized Controlled Trial.机器人辅助微创胸腹腔镜食管切除术与开胸经胸食管癌切除术治疗可切除食管癌的随机对照试验。
Ann Surg. 2019 Apr;269(4):621-630. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003031.
10
Comparison of short-term outcomes between minimally invasive McKeown and Ivor Lewis esophagectomy for esophageal or junctional cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.微创McKeown术式与Ivor Lewis术式治疗食管或食管交界癌的短期疗效比较:一项系统评价和Meta分析
Onco Targets Ther. 2018 Sep 20;11:6057-6069. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S169488. eCollection 2018.