Department of Anesthesiology, Pain Management, and Perioperative Medicine, Henry Ford Hospital, 2799 W. Grand Blvd, Detroit, MI, 48202, USA.
Can J Anaesth. 2021 Jun;68(6):773-781. doi: 10.1007/s12630-020-01911-1. Epub 2021 Jan 11.
Transversus abdominus plane (TAP) blocks are widely used for postoperative analgesia for abdominal surgical procedures. The purpose of this study was to compare the analgesic efficacy of plain bupivacaine, liposomal bupivacaine, and the mixture of plain bupivacaine with liposomal bupivacaine when used in a TAP block.
This study was a single centre, prospective, patient-, observer-, and surgeon-blinded, randomized-controlled trial in which 90 patients undergoing an open abdominal hysterectomy with a midline incision were randomized to receive a TAP block with plain bupivacaine (group bupivacaine), liposomal bupivacaine (group liposomal), or a mixture of liposomal bupivacaine and plain bupivacaine (group mixture). Primary outcomes included time to the first rescue opioid analgesic and total opioid consumption during the first 72 postoperative hours. Secondary outcomes included pain scores, patient satisfaction, incidence of hemodynamic instability, presence of local anesthetic systemic toxicity, and length of hospital stay.
The median [interquartile range] time to first opioid was 51 [28-66] min in group bupivacaine, 63 [44-102] min in group liposomal, and 51 [24-84] min in group mixture (P = 0.20). The median [interquartile range] total opioid consumption in the first 72 postoperative hours was 208 [155-270] mg in group bupivacaine, 203 [153-283] mg in group liposomal, and 202 [116-325] mg in group mixture (P = 0.92). There were no significant differences in secondary outcomes between groups.
In this small study at risk of being under-powered, the mixture of liposomal bupivacaine with plain bupivacaine for TAP block did not improve analgesia compared with either liposomal bupivacaine or plain bupivacaine on their own.
www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03250507); registered 5 April 2017.
腹横肌平面(TAP)阻滞被广泛应用于腹部外科手术后的镇痛。本研究旨在比较布比卡因普通制剂、脂质体布比卡因和布比卡因普通制剂与脂质体布比卡因混合制剂在 TAP 阻滞中的镇痛效果。
这是一项单中心、前瞻性、患者、观察者和外科医生设盲、随机对照试验,纳入 90 例行中线切口开腹子宫切除术的患者,随机分为布比卡因普通制剂组(布比卡因组)、脂质体布比卡因组(脂质体组)或脂质体布比卡因与布比卡因普通制剂混合组(混合组),接受 TAP 阻滞。主要结局指标包括首次使用阿片类药物解救镇痛的时间和术后 72 小时内的阿片类药物总消耗量。次要结局指标包括疼痛评分、患者满意度、血流动力学不稳定的发生率、局部麻醉全身毒性的发生情况和住院时间。
布比卡因组首次使用阿片类药物的中位(四分位间距)时间为 51 [28-66] min,脂质体组为 63 [44-102] min,混合组为 51 [24-84] min(P = 0.20)。术后 72 小时内阿片类药物总消耗量的中位(四分位间距)值在布比卡因组为 208 [155-270] mg,脂质体组为 203 [153-283] mg,混合组为 202 [116-325] mg(P = 0.92)。各组间次要结局无显著差异。
在这项存在潜在效能不足风险的小样本研究中,与单独使用脂质体布比卡因或布比卡因普通制剂相比,TAP 阻滞中使用布比卡因普通制剂与脂质体布比卡因混合制剂并未改善镇痛效果。
www.clinicaltrials.gov(NCT03250507);注册于 2017 年 4 月 5 日。