• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹横肌平面阻滞用脂质体布比卡因用于下腹部手术。

Liposomal bupivacaine in transversus abdominis plane blocks for lower abdominal surgery.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Maine Medical Center, Portland, Maine, USA.

Spectrum Healthcare Partners, South Portland, Maine, USA.

出版信息

Pain Pract. 2024 Jun;24(5):717-723. doi: 10.1111/papr.13347. Epub 2024 Jan 24.

DOI:10.1111/papr.13347
PMID:38265273
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11178472/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Transversus abdominis plane blocks are an established method of postoperative analgesia for abdominopelvic surgeries. Liposomal bupivacaine is an extended-release formulation of bupivacaine providing up to 72 h of analgesia. This study aims to determine if transversus abdominis plane blocks performed with liposomal bupivacaine are associated with reduced opioid consumption and level of pain intensity compared to conventional bupivacaine in patients undergoing lower abdominal surgery.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study was conducted at a single institution between December 2020 and December 2021. After institutional review board approval, we identified patients who underwent lower abdominopelvic surgery with transversus abdominis plane blocks done with liposomal or conventional bupivacaine and collected demographic, clinical, and procedural information for analysis. We compared total opioid consumption over 72-h postoperatively in milligram morphine equivalents (MME), frequency of opioid utilization, and average level of pain intensity between groups. These outcomes were also evaluated after adjusting for covariates. Data were presented as mean ± SD, median [IQR] or frequency (%), as appropriate; p < 0.05 was accepted as significant.

RESULTS

A total of 178 patients met inclusion criteria, with 79 patients receiving an admixture of liposomal bupivacaine and conventional bupivacaine and 99 patients receiving conventional bupivacaine. The liposomal bupivacaine group had a median opioid consumption 72-h postoperatively of 47.5 [18-91.8] MME compared to 88 [43.8-160] MME in the conventional bupivacaine group, p = 0.045. Differences in opioid consumption between the groups did not reach statistical significance after adjustment for demographic and clinical characteristics, p = 0.11. There was no significant difference in frequency of opioid use or average pain intensity.

CONCLUSION

Transversus abdominis plane blocks using an admixture of liposomal bupivacaine conventional bupivacaine are not associated with decreased opioid consumption or reduced pain up to 72 h following elective abdominopelvic surgery.

摘要

背景

腹横肌平面阻滞是腹部和骨盆手术后一种成熟的术后镇痛方法。脂质体布比卡因是布比卡因的一种延长释放制剂,可提供长达 72 小时的镇痛效果。本研究旨在确定与传统布比卡因相比,在接受下腹部手术的患者中,使用脂质体布比卡因进行腹横肌平面阻滞是否与减少阿片类药物消耗和疼痛强度水平相关。

方法

这是一项在 2020 年 12 月至 2021 年 12 月在一家单机构进行的回顾性队列研究。在机构审查委员会批准后,我们确定了接受下腹部腹横肌平面阻滞术的患者,这些阻滞术使用脂质体或传统布比卡因进行,并收集了分析用的人口统计学、临床和程序信息。我们比较了术后 72 小时内以吗啡等效剂量(MME)表示的总阿片类药物消耗、阿片类药物使用频率和平均疼痛强度水平。在调整协变量后,也对这些结果进行了评估。数据以均值±标准差、中位数[IQR]或频率(%)表示,p<0.05 为有统计学意义。

结果

共有 178 名患者符合纳入标准,其中 79 名患者接受了脂质体布比卡因和传统布比卡因的混合物,99 名患者接受了传统布比卡因。脂质体布比卡因组术后 72 小时的阿片类药物消耗量中位数为 47.5 [18-91.8] MME,而传统布比卡因组为 88 [43.8-160] MME,p=0.045。在调整人口统计学和临床特征后,两组之间的阿片类药物消耗差异没有达到统计学意义,p=0.11。阿片类药物使用频率或平均疼痛强度无显著差异。

结论

在择期腹部和骨盆手术后,使用脂质体布比卡因和传统布比卡因混合物的腹横肌平面阻滞术与减少阿片类药物消耗或减轻疼痛无关,持续时间长达 72 小时。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/43dc/11178472/068ccc2488ea/nihms-1959734-f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/43dc/11178472/317a6552c2a0/nihms-1959734-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/43dc/11178472/82839989ff79/nihms-1959734-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/43dc/11178472/068ccc2488ea/nihms-1959734-f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/43dc/11178472/317a6552c2a0/nihms-1959734-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/43dc/11178472/82839989ff79/nihms-1959734-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/43dc/11178472/068ccc2488ea/nihms-1959734-f0004.jpg

相似文献

1
Liposomal bupivacaine in transversus abdominis plane blocks for lower abdominal surgery.腹横肌平面阻滞用脂质体布比卡因用于下腹部手术。
Pain Pract. 2024 Jun;24(5):717-723. doi: 10.1111/papr.13347. Epub 2024 Jan 24.
2
Liposomal Bupivacaine Transversus Abdominis Plane Block Versus Epidural Analgesia in a Colon and Rectal Surgery Enhanced Recovery Pathway: A Randomized Clinical Trial.脂质体布比卡因腹横肌平面阻滞与硬膜外镇痛在结直肠手术加速康复路径中的比较:一项随机临床试验。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2018 Oct;61(10):1196-1204. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000001211.
3
Liposomal Bupivacaine Use in Transversus Abdominis Plane Blocks Reduces Pain and Postoperative Intravenous Opioid Requirement After Colorectal Surgery.脂质体布比卡因用于腹横肌平面阻滞可减轻结直肠手术后的疼痛并减少术后静脉注射阿片类药物的用量。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2017 Feb;60(2):170-177. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000747.
4
A Prospective Randomized Trial of Surgeon-Administered Intraoperative Transversus Abdominis Plane Block With Bupivacaine Against Liposomal Bupivacaine: The TINGLE Trial.前瞻性随机对照试验:外科医生管理下的布比卡因腹横肌平面阻滞与脂质体布比卡因的比较:TINGLE 试验。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2021 Jul 1;64(7):888-898. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000002008.
5
Transversus abdominis plane blocks with liposomal bupivacaine after open major hepatectomy is associated with reduced early patient-reported pain scores and opioid administration.腹横肌平面阻滞联合脂质体布比卡因用于开腹大肝切除术后可降低患者早期疼痛评分和阿片类药物的使用。
Surgery. 2018 Dec;164(6):1251-1258. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2018.07.023. Epub 2018 Sep 7.
6
Preoperative Transversus Abdominis Plane (TAP) Block with Liposomal Bupivacaine for Bariatric Patients to Reduce the Use of Opioid Analgesics.术前腹横肌平面(TAP)阻滞联合脂质体布比卡因用于肥胖患者以减少阿片类镇痛药的使用。
Obes Surg. 2019 Apr;29(4):1099-1104. doi: 10.1007/s11695-018-03668-5.
7
Recovery quality of transversus abdominis plane block with liposomal bupivacaine after cesarean delivery: A randomized trial.剖宫产术后罗哌卡因脂质体腹横肌平面阻滞的恢复质量:一项随机试验。
J Clin Anesth. 2024 Dec;99:111608. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2024.111608. Epub 2024 Sep 11.
8
Liposomal Bupivacaine Transversus Abdominis Plane Blocks in Laparoscopic Colorectal Resections: A Single-Institution Randomized Controlled Trial.脂质体布比卡因在腹腔镜结直肠癌切除术中腹横肌平面阻滞的单机构随机对照试验
Dis Colon Rectum. 2023 Feb 1;66(2):322-330. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000002346. Epub 2022 May 24.
9
The Analgesic Effects of Liposomal Bupivacaine versus Bupivacaine Hydrochloride Administered as a Transversus Abdominis Plane Block after Abdominally Based Autologous Microvascular Breast Reconstruction: A Prospective, Single-Blind, Randomized, Controlled Trial.腹侧腹壁平面阻滞下应用盐酸布比卡因与脂质体布比卡因的镇痛效果:前瞻性、单盲、随机、对照试验,用于腹部来源的自体微血管乳房重建术后。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019 Jul;144(1):35-44. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000005698.
10
Comparison of Liposomal Bupivacaine to a Local Analgesic Cocktail for Transversus Abdominis Plane Blocks in Abdominally Based Microvascular Breast Reconstruction.腹横肌平面阻滞中脂质体布比卡因与局部镇痛鸡尾酒的比较在腹部为基础的微血管乳房重建中。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2022 Sep 1;150(3):506e-515e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000009398. Epub 2022 Jun 24.

引用本文的文献

1
The effectiveness of liposomal bupivacaine in ultrasound-guided abdominal wall blocks after open abdominal surgery: A systematic review.脂质体布比卡因在开腹手术后超声引导下腹壁阻滞中的有效性:一项系统评价。
Pain Pract. 2025 Mar;25(3):e70016. doi: 10.1111/papr.70016.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparative study of dexmedetomidine versus fentanyl as adjuvants to bupivacaine in ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block in patients undergoing radical cystectomy: a prospective randomised study.超声引导下腹横肌平面阻滞中右美托咪定与芬太尼作为布比卡因佐剂的比较研究:一项前瞻性随机研究。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2022 Nov 7;22(1):340. doi: 10.1186/s12871-022-01877-1.
2
CDC Clinical Practice Guideline for Prescribing Opioids for Pain - United States, 2022.美国疾病预防控制中心 2022 年《疼痛阿片类药物处方临床实践指南》。
MMWR Recomm Rep. 2022 Nov 4;71(3):1-95. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.rr7103a1.
3
A randomized-controlled trial comparing liposomal bupivacaine, plain bupivacaine, and the mixture of liposomal bupivacaine and plain bupivacaine in transversus abdominus plane block for postoperative analgesia for open abdominal hysterectomies.
一项比较腹横肌平面阻滞中脂质体布比卡因、普通布比卡因和脂质体布比卡因与普通布比卡因混合用于开腹子宫切除术术后镇痛的随机对照试验。
Can J Anaesth. 2021 Jun;68(6):773-781. doi: 10.1007/s12630-020-01911-1. Epub 2021 Jan 11.
4
Transversus Abdominis Plane Block as a Treatment Modality for Chronic Abdominal Pain.腹横肌平面阻滞作为一种治疗慢性腹痛的方法。
Pain Physician. 2020 Jul;23(4):405-412.
5
Efficacy of Adding Midazolam to Bupivacaine for Transversus Abdominis Plane Block on Postoperative Analgesia after Hysterectomy: A Randomized Controlled Study.在布比卡因中添加咪达唑仑用于腹横肌平面阻滞对子宫切除术后镇痛的效果:一项随机对照研究
Anesth Essays Res. 2019 Jul-Sep;13(3):522-527. doi: 10.4103/aer.AER_95_19.
6
Patient-Reported Outcomes: Understanding Surgical Efficacy and Quality from the Patient's Perspective.患者报告结局:从患者角度理解手术疗效和质量。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2020 Jan;27(1):56-64. doi: 10.1245/s10434-019-07748-3. Epub 2019 Sep 5.
7
Dexamethasone added to local anesthetics in ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plain (TAP) block for analgesia after abdominal surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.超声引导腹横肌平面(TAP)阻滞中加入地塞米松用于腹部手术后镇痛的随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2019 Jan 8;14(1):e0209646. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0209646. eCollection 2019.
8
Efficacy of Magnesium Sulfate Added to Local Anesthetic in a Transversus Abdominis Plane Block for Analgesia Following Total Abdominal Hysterectomy: A Randomized Trial.硫酸镁复合局麻药行腹横肌平面阻滞用于全子宫切除术后镇痛的随机对照研究。
Pain Physician. 2017 Nov;20(7):641-647.
9
The Role of Transversus Abdominis Plane Blocks in Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Pathways for Open and Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery.腹横肌平面阻滞在开放和腹腔镜结直肠手术术后加速康复路径中的作用
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2017 Sep;27(9):909-914. doi: 10.1089/lap.2017.0337. Epub 2017 Jul 25.
10
Transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block versus thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) in laparoscopic colon surgery in the ERAS program.腹横肌平面(TAP)阻滞与胸段硬膜外镇痛(TEA)在加速康复外科(ERAS)程序下腹腔镜结肠手术中的比较。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Jan;32(1):376-382. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5686-7. Epub 2017 Jul 1.