• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

薄壁与厚壁无聚合物载药雷帕霉素洗脱支架:BioFreedom QCA 随机试验

Thin- versus thick-strut polymer-free biolimus-eluting stents: the BioFreedom QCA randomised trial.

机构信息

Department of Interventional Cardiology, Cardiovascular Institute, Hospital Clinic IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

EuroIntervention. 2021 Jun 25;17(3):233-239. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-20-01162.

DOI:10.4244/EIJ-D-20-01162
PMID:33433389
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9724946/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The BioFreedom drug-coated stent with a stainless steel platform (BF-SS) has been demonstrated to be efficacious in patients at high bleeding risk and receiv-ing only one-month dual antiplatelet therapy.

AIMS

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of the new BioFreedom Ultra drug-coated stent with a thin-strut cobalt-chromium platform (BF-CoCr) compared to the BF-SS in an all-comers population undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

METHODS

This was a prospective, multicentre, non-inferiority trial. The primary endpoint was in-stent late lumen loss (LLL) as determined by quantitative coronary angiography at nine-month follow-up. Clinical evaluation was performed at one year.

RESULTS

A total of 200 patients were randomised (1:1) to either the BF-CoCr or the BF-SS stent at eight centres in Spain and Denmark. Baseline clinical and lesion characteristics were similar between the groups. Mean age was 66 years and 23% were female. The mean number of stents implanted per patient was 1.5. At nine-month follow-up, mean in-stent LLL was 0.34±0.49 mm in the BF-CoCr group versus 0.29±0.37 mm in the BF-SS group, p=0.005 for non-inferiority. At one year, target lesion failure was similar between the groups (7.3% in BF-CoCr vs 9.3% in the BF-SS group; p=0.60).

CONCLUSIONS

The BF-CoCr was non-inferior to the BF-SS in terms of in-stent LLL at nine months. Larger studies powered for clinical endpoints are warranted to compare the efficacy of this new platform with currently available DES.

摘要

背景

载药不锈钢平台 BioFreedom 药物洗脱支架(BF-SS)在高出血风险患者中接受单月双联抗血小板治疗时已被证明有效。

目的

本研究旨在评估新型薄壁钴铬平台 BioFreedom Ultra 药物洗脱支架(BF-CoCr)与 BF-SS 在接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的所有患者中的疗效。

方法

这是一项前瞻性、多中心、非劣效性试验。主要终点是 9 个月随访时定量冠状动脉造影测定的支架内晚期管腔丢失(LLL)。临床评估在一年时进行。

结果

在西班牙和丹麦的 8 个中心,共有 200 名患者(1:1)随机分配至 BF-CoCr 或 BF-SS 支架组。两组患者的基线临床和病变特征相似。平均年龄为 66 岁,23%为女性。平均每位患者植入的支架数为 1.5 个。9 个月随访时,BF-CoCr 组支架内平均 LLL 为 0.34±0.49mm,BF-SS 组为 0.29±0.37mm,BF-CoCr 组非劣效性优于 BF-SS 组(p=0.005)。一年时,两组间靶病变失败率相似(BF-CoCr 组为 7.3%,BF-SS 组为 9.3%;p=0.60)。

结论

BF-CoCr 在 9 个月时的支架内 LLL 方面非劣效于 BF-SS。需要更大的研究来比较该新型平台与目前可用的 DES 的疗效。

相似文献

1
Thin- versus thick-strut polymer-free biolimus-eluting stents: the BioFreedom QCA randomised trial.薄壁与厚壁无聚合物载药雷帕霉素洗脱支架:BioFreedom QCA 随机试验
EuroIntervention. 2021 Jun 25;17(3):233-239. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-20-01162.
2
Thin Strut CoCr Biodegradable Polymer Biolimus A9-Eluting Stents versus Thicker Strut Stainless Steel Biodegradable Polymer Biolimus A9-Eluting Stents: Two-Year Clinical Outcomes.薄支架钴铬可生物降解聚合物依维莫司 A9 洗脱支架与厚支架不锈钢可生物降解聚合物依维莫司 A9 洗脱支架的比较:两年临床结果。
J Interv Cardiol. 2021 Apr 1;2021:6654515. doi: 10.1155/2021/6654515. eCollection 2021.
3
Randomized Comparison of the Polymer-Free Biolimus-Coated BioFreedom Stent With the Ultrathin Strut Biodegradable Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Orsiro Stent in an All-Comers Population Treated With Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: The SORT OUT IX Trial.随机比较聚合物自由的生物可吸收雷帕霉素洗脱紫杉醇 Orsiro 支架与超薄支架生物可降解聚合物西罗莫司洗脱 BioFreedom 支架在经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的所有患者中的疗效:SORT OUT IX 试验。
Circulation. 2020 Jun 23;141(25):2052-2063. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.040241. Epub 2020 May 21.
4
Polymer-free Biolimus-A9 coated thin strut stents for patients at high bleeding risk 1-year results from the LEADERS FREE III study.聚合物自由的比伐卢定涂层薄支架在高出血风险患者中的应用:LEADERS FREE III 研究 1 年结果。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Feb;99(3):593-600. doi: 10.1002/ccd.29869. Epub 2021 Jul 9.
5
First-in-human evaluation of a bioabsorbable polymer-coated sirolimus-eluting stent: imaging and clinical results of the DESSOLVE I Trial (DES with sirolimus and a bioabsorbable polymer for the treatment of patients with de novo lesion in the native coronary arteries).首例人体生物可吸收聚合物涂层依维莫司洗脱支架的评估:DESOLVE I 试验(载有依维莫司和生物可吸收聚合物的 DES 治疗原发性冠状动脉病变患者)的影像学和临床结果。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Oct;6(10):1026-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.05.013. Epub 2013 Sep 18.
6
Comparison of the polymer-free biolimus-coated BioFreedom stent with the thin-strut biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting Orsiro stent in an all-comers population treated with percutaneous coronary intervention: Rationale and design of the randomized SORT OUT IX trial.在接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的所有患者中,比较无聚合物涂层的 Biolimus 涂层 BioFreedom 支架与薄壁可生物降解聚合物西罗莫司洗脱 Orsiro 支架:随机 SORT OUT IX 试验的原理和设计。
Am Heart J. 2019 Jul;213:1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2019.02.017. Epub 2019 Mar 14.
7
Polymer-free biolimus-coated stents versus ultrathin-strut biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stents: two-year outcomes of the randomised SORT OUT IX trial.无聚合物涂层的依维莫司涂层支架与超小径可降解聚合物西罗莫司洗脱支架的比较:随机 SORT OUT IX 试验的 2 年结果。
EuroIntervention. 2022 Jun 3;18(2):e124-e131. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00874.
8
Clinical outcomes with thin versus thick strut polymer-free biolimus-coated stents at 3 years.3 年时薄壁与厚壁无聚合物载药雷帕霉素涂层支架的临床结果。
Open Heart. 2024 Jun 18;11(1):e002679. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2024-002679.
9
Early vascular healing after implantation of the polymer-free biolimus-eluting stent or the ultrathin strut biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者中,无聚合物涂层的依维莫司洗脱支架或超薄支架可生物降解聚合物西罗莫司洗脱支架植入后的早期血管愈合。
Coron Artery Dis. 2022 May 1;33(3):196-205. doi: 10.1097/MCA.0000000000001113.
10
Very thin strut biodegradable polymer everolimus-eluting and sirolimus-eluting stents versus durable polymer zotarolimus-eluting stents in allcomers with coronary artery disease (BIO-RESORT): a three-arm, randomised, non-inferiority trial.非常薄的支撑物可生物降解聚合物依维莫司洗脱和西罗莫司洗脱支架与全人群冠心病使用耐用聚合物佐他莫司洗脱支架(BIO-RESORT):一项三臂、随机、非劣效试验。
Lancet. 2016 Nov 26;388(10060):2607-2617. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31920-1. Epub 2016 Oct 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Polymer-free biolimus-eluting stents: there is no such thing as a free lunch.无聚合物生物雷帕霉素洗脱支架:天下没有免费的午餐。
EuroIntervention. 2025 Jun 2;21(11):e592-e593. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-E-25-00014.
2
Five-year outcomes of a drug-coated polymer-free biolimus-eluting stent versus an ultrathin-strut biodegradable-polymer sirolimus-eluting stent.无药物涂层聚合物的生物雷帕霉素洗脱支架与超薄支可降解聚合物西罗莫司洗脱支架的五年随访结果
EuroIntervention. 2025 Jun 2;21(11):e617-e628. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-24-00586.
3
Polymer-free versus biodegradable-polymer drug-eluting stent in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: an assessor-blind, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial.接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者中无聚合物与可生物降解聚合物药物洗脱支架的比较:一项评估者盲法、非劣效性随机对照试验
EuroIntervention. 2025 Jan 6;21(1):58-72. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-24-00657.
4
Evolution of Coronary Stent Platforms: A Brief Overview of Currently Used Drug-Eluting Stents.冠状动脉支架平台的演变:当前使用的药物洗脱支架简要概述。
J Clin Med. 2023 Oct 24;12(21):6711. doi: 10.3390/jcm12216711.
5
Polymer-free biolimus-coated stents versus ultrathin-strut biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stents: two-year outcomes of the randomised SORT OUT IX trial.无聚合物涂层的依维莫司涂层支架与超小径可降解聚合物西罗莫司洗脱支架的比较:随机 SORT OUT IX 试验的 2 年结果。
EuroIntervention. 2022 Jun 3;18(2):e124-e131. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00874.

本文引用的文献

1
Magnesium-Based Resorbable Scaffold Versus Permanent Metallic Sirolimus-Eluting Stent in Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: The MAGSTEMI Randomized Clinical Trial.镁基可吸收支架与永久性金属西罗莫司洗脱支架治疗 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者的比较:MAGSTEMI 随机临床试验。
Circulation. 2019 Dec 3;140(23):1904-1916. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.043467. Epub 2019 Sep 25.
2
Meta-Analysis of the Impact of Strut Thickness on Outcomes in Patients With Drug-Eluting Stents in a Coronary Artery.冠状动脉内药物洗脱支架支架厚度对患者结局影响的荟萃分析。
Am J Cardiol. 2018 Nov 15;122(10):1652-1660. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2018.07.040. Epub 2018 Sep 8.
3
Angiographic late lumen loss revisited: impact on long-term target lesion revascularization.再次探讨血管造影晚期管腔丢失:对长期靶病变血运重建的影响。
Eur Heart J. 2018 Sep 21;39(36):3381-3389. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy436.
4
A Randomized Comparison of Reservoir-Based Polymer-Free Amphilimus-Eluting Stents Versus Everolimus-Eluting Stents With Durable Polymer in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus: The RESERVOIR Clinical Trial.随机比较载药无聚合物的依维莫司洗脱支架与载持久聚合物的依维莫司洗脱支架在糖尿病患者中的应用:RESERVOIR 临床试验。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Jan 11;9(1):42-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2015.09.020.
5
Clinical outcomes in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction treated with everolimus-eluting stents versus bare-metal stents (EXAMINATION): 5-year results of a randomised trial.依维莫司洗脱支架与金属裸支架治疗 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者的临床结局(EXAMINATION):一项随机试验的 5 年结果。
Lancet. 2016 Jan 23;387(10016):357-366. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00548-6. Epub 2015 Oct 29.
6
Polymer-free Drug-Coated Coronary Stents in Patients at High Bleeding Risk.高出血风险患者的无聚合物涂层药物洗脱冠状动脉支架。
N Engl J Med. 2015 Nov 19;373(21):2038-47. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1503943. Epub 2015 Oct 14.
7
Impact of stent strut design in metallic stents and biodegradable scaffolds.金属支架和可生物降解支架中支架支柱设计的影响
Int J Cardiol. 2014 Dec 20;177(3):800-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2014.09.143. Epub 2014 Oct 7.
8
Abluminal biodegradable polymer biolimus-eluting stent versus durable polymer everolimus-eluting stent (COMPARE II): a randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial.无聚合物可降解聚合物雷帕霉素洗脱支架与持久性聚合物依维莫司洗脱支架(COMPARE II):一项随机、对照、非劣效性试验。
Lancet. 2013 Feb 23;381(9867):651-60. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61852-2. Epub 2013 Jan 30.
9
Role of endothelial shear stress in stent restenosis and thrombosis: pathophysiologic mechanisms and implications for clinical translation.内皮剪切应力在支架再狭窄和血栓形成中的作用:病理生理机制及其对临床转化的意义。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Apr 10;59(15):1337-49. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.10.903.
10
Comparison of zotarolimus-eluting and everolimus-eluting coronary stents.比较佐他莫司洗脱和依维莫司洗脱冠状动脉支架。
N Engl J Med. 2010 Jul 8;363(2):136-46. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1004130. Epub 2010 Jun 16.