Goltermann Janik, Emden Daniel, Leehr Elisabeth Johanna, Dohm Katharina, Redlich Ronny, Dannlowski Udo, Hahn Tim, Opel Nils
Department of Psychiatry, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.
Institute of Psychology, University of Halle, Halle, Germany.
JMIR Ment Health. 2021 Jan 12;8(1):e24333. doi: 10.2196/24333.
Smartphone-based symptom monitoring has gained increased attention in psychiatric research as a cost-efficient tool for prospective and ecologically valid assessments based on participants' self-reports. However, a meaningful interpretation of smartphone-based assessments requires knowledge about their psychometric properties, especially their validity.
The goal of this study is to systematically investigate the validity of smartphone-administered assessments of self-reported affective symptoms using the Remote Monitoring Application in Psychiatry (ReMAP).
The ReMAP app was distributed to 173 adult participants of ongoing, longitudinal psychiatric phenotyping studies, including healthy control participants, as well as patients with affective disorders and anxiety disorders; the mean age of the sample was 30.14 years (SD 11.92). The Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) and single-item mood and sleep information were assessed via the ReMAP app and validated with non-smartphone-based BDI scores and clinician-rated depression severity using the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS).
We found overall high comparability between smartphone-based and non-smartphone-based BDI scores (intraclass correlation coefficient=0.921; P<.001). Smartphone-based BDI scores further correlated with non-smartphone-based HDRS ratings of depression severity in a subsample (r=0.783; P<.001; n=51). Higher agreement between smartphone-based and non-smartphone-based assessments was found among affective disorder patients as compared to healthy controls and anxiety disorder patients. Highly comparable agreement between delivery formats was found across age and gender groups. Similarly, smartphone-based single-item self-ratings of mood correlated with BDI sum scores (r=-0.538; P<.001; n=168), while smartphone-based single-item sleep duration correlated with the sleep item of the BDI (r=-0.310; P<.001; n=166).
These findings demonstrate that smartphone-based monitoring of depressive symptoms via the ReMAP app provides valid assessments of depressive symptomatology and, therefore, represents a useful tool for prospective digital phenotyping in affective disorder patients in clinical and research applications.
基于智能手机的症状监测作为一种具有成本效益的工具,用于基于参与者自我报告的前瞻性和生态有效评估,在精神病学研究中受到了越来越多的关注。然而,对基于智能手机的评估进行有意义的解释需要了解其心理测量特性,尤其是其有效性。
本研究的目的是系统地调查使用精神病远程监测应用程序(ReMAP)对自我报告的情感症状进行智能手机管理评估的有效性。
将ReMAP应用程序分发给173名正在进行的纵向精神病学表型研究的成年参与者,包括健康对照参与者以及情感障碍和焦虑症患者;样本的平均年龄为30.14岁(标准差11.92)。通过ReMAP应用程序评估贝克抑郁量表(BDI)以及单项情绪和睡眠信息,并使用汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HDRS)将其与基于非智能手机的BDI分数和临床医生评定的抑郁严重程度进行验证。
我们发现基于智能手机和基于非智能手机的BDI分数总体上具有高度可比性(组内相关系数=0.921;P<.001)。在一个子样本中,基于智能手机的BDI分数进一步与基于非智能手机的HDRS抑郁严重程度评分相关(r=0.783;P<.001;n=51)。与健康对照和焦虑症患者相比,情感障碍患者中基于智能手机和基于非智能手机的评估之间的一致性更高。在年龄和性别组中发现不同交付形式之间具有高度可比的一致性。同样,基于智能手机的单项情绪自我评分与BDI总分相关(r=-0.538;P<.001;n=168),而基于智能手机的单项睡眠时间与BDI的睡眠项目相关(r=-0.310;P<.001;n=166)。
这些发现表明,通过ReMAP应用程序对抑郁症状进行基于智能手机的监测能够有效评估抑郁症状,因此,在临床和研究应用中,它是情感障碍患者前瞻性数字表型分析的有用工具。