Gao Yong-Bin, Liu Zhi-Gang, Lin Guo-Dong, Guo Yang, Chen Lei, Huang Bo-Tao, Yin Yao-Bin, Yang Chen, Sun Li-Ying, Rong Yan-Bo, Chen Shanlin
Department of Hand Surgery, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Beijing, China.
Department of Hand Surgery, The First Bethune Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin Province, China.
Neural Regen Res. 2021 Aug;16(8):1652-1659. doi: 10.4103/1673-5374.303040.
A new nerve matrix membrane derived from decellularized porcine nerves has been shown to retain the major extracellular matrix components, and to be effective in preventing adhesion between the nerve anastomosis sites and the surrounding tissues in a rat sciatic nerve transection model, thereby enhancing regeneration of the nerve. The effectiveness of the membrane may be attributed to its various bioactive components. In this prospective, randomized, single-blind, parallel-controlled multicenter clinical trial, we compared the safety and efficacy of the new nerve matrix membrane with a previously approved bovine tendon-derived type I collagen nerve wrapping. A total of 120 patients with peripheral nerve injury were recruited from Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, The First Bethune Hospital of Jilin University, and Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital, China. The patients were randomly assigned to undergo end-to-end and tension-free neurorrhaphy with nerve matrix membrane (n = 60, 52 male, 8 female, mean age 41.34 years, experimental group) or tendon-derived collagen nerve wrapping (n = 60, 42 male, 18 female, mean age 40.17 years, control group). Patients were followed-up at 14 ± 5, 30 ± 7, 90 ± 10 and 180 ± 20 days after the operation. Safety evaluation included analyses of local and systemic reactions, related laboratory tests, and adverse reactions. Efficacy evaluation included a static 2-point discrimination test, a moving 2-point discrimination test, and a Semmes-Weinstein monofilament examination. Sensory nerve function was evaluated with the British Medical Research Council Scale and Semmes-Weinstein monofilament examination. The ratio (percentage) of patients with excellent to good results in sensory nerve recovery 180 ± 20 days after the treatment was used as the primary effectiveness index. The percentages of patients with excellent to good results in the experimental and control groups were 98.00% and 94.44%, respectively, with no significant difference between the two groups. There were no significant differences in the results of routine blood tests, liver and renal function tests, coagulation function tests, or immunoglobulin tests at 14 and 180 days postoperatively between the two groups. These findings suggest that the novel nerve matrix membrane is similar in efficacy to the commercially-available bovine-derived collagen membrane in the repair of peripheral nerve injury, and it may therefore serve as an alternative in the clinical setting. The clinical trial was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee of Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, China (approval No. 20160902) on October 8, 2016, the Institutional Ethics Committee of the First Bethune Hospital of Jilin University, China (approval No. 160518-088) on December 14, 2016, and the Institutional Ethics Committee of Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital, China (approval No. 2016-10-01) on December 9, 2016. The clinical trial was registered with the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (registration number: ChiCTR2000033324) on May 28, 2020.
一种源自去细胞猪神经的新型神经基质膜已被证明能保留主要的细胞外基质成分,并且在大鼠坐骨神经横断模型中能有效防止神经吻合部位与周围组织之间的粘连,从而促进神经再生。该膜的有效性可能归因于其多种生物活性成分。在这项前瞻性、随机、单盲、平行对照的多中心临床试验中,我们比较了新型神经基质膜与先前批准的牛肌腱来源的I型胶原神经包裹物的安全性和有效性。总共从中国北京积水潭医院、吉林大学白求恩第一医院和烟台毓璜顶医院招募了120例周围神经损伤患者。患者被随机分配接受使用神经基质膜的端对端无张力神经缝合术(n = 60,男52例,女8例,平均年龄41.34岁,实验组)或肌腱来源的胶原神经包裹术(n = 60,男42例,女18例,平均年龄40.17岁,对照组)。术后14±5、30±7、90±10和180±20天对患者进行随访。安全性评估包括局部和全身反应分析、相关实验室检查以及不良反应。疗效评估包括静态两点辨别试验、动态两点辨别试验和Semmes-Weinstein单丝检查。使用英国医学研究理事会量表和Semmes-Weinstein单丝检查评估感觉神经功能。将治疗后180±20天感觉神经恢复良好至优秀的患者比例(百分比)作为主要疗效指标。实验组和对照组中良好至优秀结果的患者百分比分别为98.00%和94.44%,两组之间无显著差异。两组术后14天和180天的血常规、肝肾功能检查、凝血功能检查或免疫球蛋白检查结果均无显著差异。这些发现表明,新型神经基质膜在修复周围神经损伤方面的疗效与市售牛源胶原膜相似,因此在临床环境中可作为一种替代选择。该临床试验于2016年10月8日获得中国北京积水潭医院机构伦理委员会批准(批准号:20160902),于2016年12月14日获得吉林大学白求恩第一医院机构伦理委员会批准(批准号:160518 - 088),于2016年12月9日获得烟台毓璜顶医院机构伦理委员会批准(批准号:2016 - 10 - 01)。该临床试验于2020年5月28日在中国临床试验注册中心注册(注册号:ChiCTR2000033324)。