• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

植入式心脏设备与连续流左心室辅助设备之间的电磁干扰:综述。

Electromagnetic interference between implantable cardiac devices and continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices: a review.

机构信息

Division of Cardiac Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, 1025 Walnut St, Suite 607, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

Department of Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

出版信息

J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2021 Jun;61(1):1-10. doi: 10.1007/s10840-020-00930-8. Epub 2021 Jan 12.

DOI:10.1007/s10840-020-00930-8
PMID:33433742
Abstract

Many patients with continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices (CF-LVAD) have other, co-existing implantable cardiac devices. While such devices often function appropriately, there is potential for electromagnetic interference (EMI). A literature review was performed to identify cases of EMI between CF-LVAD and other implanted cardiac devices to better understand their etiology, outcomes, and the strategies used to overcome such interference. The cases identified included interference between CF-LVAD and pacemakers, implantable cardioverter-defibrillators, and cardiac resynchronization therapy. The EMI reported in the current literature can be broken down into two general categories: interference leading to difficulty establishing telemetry and interference leading to impaired electrical signal sensing. Such interference led to inappropriate shock delivery in some cases. The type of interference, and thus treatments, differed and were device dependent. The strategies employed to reduce interference included metal shielding, physical manipulation to increase the distance between devices, and even exchange of the implanted device with another brand of the same class. To avoid such EMI in the future, physicians must be aware of the reported interference between certain devices, and manufacturers must work more closely to increase the compatibility of implanted cardiac devices.

摘要

许多接受左心室辅助装置(CF-LVAD)连续流动治疗的患者都有其他共存的可植入心脏设备。虽然这些设备通常能正常工作,但存在电磁干扰(EMI)的潜在风险。我们进行了文献回顾,以确定 CF-LVAD 与其他植入式心脏设备之间 EMI 的案例,以更好地了解其病因、结果以及克服此类干扰的策略。确定的案例包括 CF-LVAD 与起搏器、植入式心脏复律除颤器和心脏再同步治疗之间的干扰。当前文献中报告的 EMI 可分为两类:导致遥测困难的干扰和导致电信号感应受损的干扰。这种干扰导致一些情况下出现不适当的电击治疗。干扰的类型,以及因此的治疗方法,因设备而异。为了减少干扰而采用的策略包括金属屏蔽、物理操作以增加设备之间的距离,甚至更换为同一类别的另一种品牌的植入设备。为了避免未来出现这种 EMI,医生必须了解某些设备之间报告的干扰,制造商必须更加密切地合作,以提高植入式心脏设备的兼容性。

相似文献

1
Electromagnetic interference between implantable cardiac devices and continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices: a review.植入式心脏设备与连续流左心室辅助设备之间的电磁干扰:综述。
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2021 Jun;61(1):1-10. doi: 10.1007/s10840-020-00930-8. Epub 2021 Jan 12.
2
Electromagnetic interference from left ventricular assist devices in patients with subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillators.左心室辅助装置对皮下植入式心律转复除颤器患者的电磁干扰。
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2020 May;31(5):1195-1201. doi: 10.1111/jce.14431. Epub 2020 Mar 9.
3
Electromagnetic interference from left ventricular assist device in patients with transvenous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator.经静脉植入式心脏复律除颤器患者左心室辅助装置的电磁干扰。
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2021 Jul;44(7):1163-1175. doi: 10.1111/pace.14265. Epub 2021 May 21.
4
Device-device interaction between cardiac implantable electronic devices and continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices.心脏植入式电子设备与连续血流左心室辅助设备之间的设备-设备相互作用。
Heart Rhythm. 2023 Jun;20(6):918-926. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2023.02.020. Epub 2023 Feb 28.
5
Electromagnetic interference of automatic implantable cardioverter defibrillator and HeartWare left ventricular assist device.自动植入式心脏除颤复律器与 HeartWare 左心室辅助装置的电磁干扰
ASAIO J. 2013 Mar-Apr;59(2):136-9. doi: 10.1097/MAT.0b013e318285fe93.
6
Emerging electromagnetic interferences between implantable cardioverter-defibrillators and left ventricular assist devices.植入式心脏复律除颤器与左心室辅助装置之间出现的电磁干扰
Europace. 2020 Apr 1;22(4):584-587. doi: 10.1093/europace/euaa006.
7
Electromagnetic interference from left ventricular assist devices detected in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators.在植入式心脏复律除颤器患者中检测到左心室辅助装置产生的电磁干扰。
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2022 Jan;33(1):93-101. doi: 10.1111/jce.15300. Epub 2021 Dec 6.
8
A case of electromagnetic interference between HeartMate 3 LVAD and implantable cardioverter defibrillator.一例HeartMate 3左心室辅助装置与植入式心脏复律除颤器之间的电磁干扰病例。
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2018 Feb;41(2):218-220. doi: 10.1111/pace.13210. Epub 2017 Nov 29.
9
Left ventricular mechanical assist devices and cardiac device interactions: an observational case series.左心室机械辅助装置与心脏装置的相互作用:一项观察性病例系列研究。
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2009 Jul;32(7):879-87. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2009.02403.x.
10
Electric smog: telemetry interference between ICD and LVAD.电烟雾:植入式心律转复除颤器与左心室辅助装置之间的遥测干扰。
Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol. 2017 Sep;28(3):257-259. doi: 10.1007/s00399-017-0509-z. Epub 2017 May 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Navigating Complications in Cardiac Pacemakers: A Comprehensive Review and Management Strategies.心脏起搏器并发症的处理:全面综述与管理策略
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Aug 21;25(8):299. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2508299. eCollection 2024 Aug.
2
Left ventricular assist device implantation outcomes in patients with subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: A case series.皮下植入式心脏复律除颤器患者的左心室辅助装置植入结局:病例系列
Am Heart J Plus. 2024 Jul 17;45:100426. doi: 10.1016/j.ahjo.2024.100426. eCollection 2024 Sep.

本文引用的文献

1
The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Intermacs 2019 Annual Report: The Changing Landscape of Devices and Indications.胸外科医生协会 Intermacs 2019 年度报告:设备和适应证的变化格局。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2020 Mar;109(3):649-660. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2019.12.005.
2
Influence of a fully magnetically levitated left ventricular assist device on functional interrogation of implantable cardioverter defibrillators.完全磁悬浮左心室辅助装置对植入式心脏复律除颤器功能检测的影响。
Clin Cardiol. 2019 Oct;42(10):914-918. doi: 10.1002/clc.23228. Epub 2019 Jul 7.
3
Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators in Patients With Continuous Flow Left Ventricular Assist Devices: Utilization Patterns, Related Procedures, and Complications.
植入式心脏除颤器在持续性左心室辅助装置患者中的应用:利用模式、相关手术和并发症。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2019 Jul 16;8(14):e011813. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.011813. Epub 2019 Jul 6.
4
Initial experience with telemonitoring in left ventricular assist device patients.左心室辅助装置患者远程监测的初步经验。
J Thorac Dis. 2019 Apr;11(Suppl 6):S853-S863. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2018.10.37.
5
The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Intermacs Database Annual Report: Evolving Indications, Outcomes, and Scientific Partnerships.《胸外科医师学会 Intermacs 数据库年度报告:不断变化的适应证、结果和科学合作》。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2019 Feb;107(2):341-353. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2018.11.011.
6
Subcutaneous Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator and Left Ventricular Assist Device: A Safe and Effective Approach for Refractory Heart Failure.皮下植入式心脏复律除颤器与左心室辅助装置:治疗难治性心力衰竭的一种安全有效的方法
JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2016 Apr;2(2):246-247. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2015.10.008. Epub 2015 Nov 17.
7
Subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator (S-ICD) shocks in a patient with a left ventricular assist device.一名植入左心室辅助装置的患者接受皮下植入式心律转复除颤器(S-ICD)电击治疗。
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2018 Mar;41(3):309-311. doi: 10.1111/pace.13273. Epub 2018 Feb 2.
8
Effects of implantable cardioverter/defibrillator shock and antitachycardia pacing on anxiety and quality of life: A MADIT-RIT substudy.植入式心脏复律除颤器电击和抗心动过速起搏对焦虑及生活质量的影响:一项MADIT-RIT子研究
Am Heart J. 2017 Jul;189:75-84. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2017.03.009. Epub 2017 Mar 20.
9
Electric smog: telemetry interference between ICD and LVAD.电烟雾:植入式心律转复除颤器与左心室辅助装置之间的遥测干扰。
Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol. 2017 Sep;28(3):257-259. doi: 10.1007/s00399-017-0509-z. Epub 2017 May 12.
10
Inhibition of pacing in a dependent patient with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator and a left ventricular assist device.对一名植入式心脏复律除颤器和左心室辅助装置的依赖型患者进行起搏抑制。
HeartRhythm Case Rep. 2016 Jul 27;2(6):473-477. doi: 10.1016/j.hrcr.2016.06.008. eCollection 2016 Nov.