• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

分诊中的急性腹痛:曼彻斯特分诊系统有效性的回顾性观察研究。

Acute abdominal pain in triage: A retrospective observational study of the Manchester triage system's validity.

机构信息

Emergency Department, Hospital of Merano (SABES-ASDAA), Merano-Meran, Italy.

College of Health Care Professions Claudiana, Bolzano-Bozen, Italy.

出版信息

J Clin Nurs. 2021 Apr;30(7-8):942-951. doi: 10.1111/jocn.15635. Epub 2021 Jan 25.

DOI:10.1111/jocn.15635
PMID:33434346
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Roughly 5% to 10% of patients admitted to the emergency department suffer from acute abdominal pain. Triage plays a key role in patient stratification, identifying patients who need prompt treatment versus those who can safely wait. In this regard, the aim of this study was to estimate the performance of the Manchester Triage System in classifying patients with acute abdominal pain.

METHODS

A total of 9,851 patients admitted at the Emergency Department of the Merano Hospital with acute abdominal pain were retrospectively enrolled between 1 January 2017 and 30 June 2019. The study was conducted and reported according to the STROBE statement. The sensitivity and specificity of the Manchester Triage System were estimated by verifying the triage classification received by the patients and their survival at seven days or the need for acute surgery within 72 h after emergency department access.

RESULTS

Among the patients with acute abdominal pain (median age 50 years), 0.4% died within seven days and 8.9% required surgery within 72 hours. The sensitivity was 44.7% (29.9-61.5), specificity was 95.4% (94.9-95.8), and negative predictive value was 99.7% (99.2-100) in relation to death at seven days.

CONCLUSIONS

The Manchester Triage System shows good specificity and negative predictive value. However, its sensitivity was low due to the amount of incorrect triage prediction in patients with high-priority codes (red/orange), suggesting overtriage in relation to seven-day mortality. This may be a protective measure for the patient. In contrast, the need for acute surgery within 72 h was affected by under-triage.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

The triage nurse using Manchester Triage System can correctly prioritise the majority of patients with acute abdominal pain, especially in low acuity patients. The Manchester Triage System is safe and does not underestimate the severity of the patients.

摘要

目的

大约有 5%至 10%的急诊科患者患有急性腹痛。分诊在患者分层中起着关键作用,确定需要立即治疗的患者和可以安全等待的患者。在这方面,本研究旨在估计曼彻斯特分诊系统在分类急性腹痛患者方面的性能。

方法

回顾性纳入 2017 年 1 月 1 日至 2019 年 6 月 30 日期间在梅拉诺医院急诊科就诊的 9851 例急性腹痛患者。该研究根据 STROBE 声明进行和报告。通过验证患者接受的分诊分类及其在 7 天内的生存情况或在急诊科就诊后 72 小时内需要急症手术,估计曼彻斯特分诊系统的敏感性和特异性。

结果

在患有急性腹痛的患者中(中位年龄 50 岁),0.4%在 7 天内死亡,8.9%在 72 小时内需要手术。与 7 天内死亡相关,其敏感性为 44.7%(29.9-61.5),特异性为 95.4%(94.9-95.8),阴性预测值为 99.7%(99.2-100)。

结论

曼彻斯特分诊系统具有良好的特异性和阴性预测值。然而,由于高优先级代码(红色/橙色)患者的分诊预测错误较多,其敏感性较低,提示与 7 天死亡率相关的分诊过度。这可能是对患者的一种保护措施。相比之下,72 小时内需要急症手术的情况受到分诊不足的影响。

临床意义

使用曼彻斯特分诊系统的分诊护士可以正确确定大多数急性腹痛患者的优先级,特别是低危患者。曼彻斯特分诊系统是安全的,不会低估患者的严重程度。

相似文献

1
Acute abdominal pain in triage: A retrospective observational study of the Manchester triage system's validity.分诊中的急性腹痛:曼彻斯特分诊系统有效性的回顾性观察研究。
J Clin Nurs. 2021 Apr;30(7-8):942-951. doi: 10.1111/jocn.15635. Epub 2021 Jan 25.
2
The effectiveness of a modified Manchester Triage System for geriatric patients: A retrospective quantitative study.改良曼彻斯特分诊系统对老年患者的有效性:一项回顾性定量研究。
Nurs Open. 2024 Sep;11(9):e70024. doi: 10.1002/nop2.70024.
3
Triage of patients with fever: The Manchester triage system's predictive validity for sepsis or septic shock and seven-day mortality.发热患者分诊:曼彻斯特分诊系统对脓毒症或感染性休克的预测准确性和七天死亡率。
J Crit Care. 2020 Oct;59:63-69. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2020.05.019. Epub 2020 Jun 6.
4
Performance of the Manchester Triage System in patients with dyspnoea: A retrospective observational study.曼彻斯特分诊系统在呼吸困难患者中的表现:一项回顾性观察研究。
Int Emerg Nurs. 2020 Nov;53:100931. doi: 10.1016/j.ienj.2020.100931. Epub 2020 Oct 6.
5
Triage assessment of transitory loss of consciousness in the emergency department-A retrospective observational study.急诊科短暂意识丧失的分诊评估——一项回顾性观察研究
J Adv Nurs. 2022 May;78(5):1337-1347. doi: 10.1111/jan.15048. Epub 2021 Sep 17.
6
Sensitivity and specificity of the Manchester Triage System in risk prioritization of patients with acute myocardial infarction who present with chest pain.曼彻斯特分诊系统对胸痛就诊的急性心肌梗死患者进行风险优先级排序的敏感性和特异性。
Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2018 Oct;17(7):660-666. doi: 10.1177/1474515118777402. Epub 2018 May 11.
7
The Manchester Triage System's performance in clinical risk prioritisation of patients presenting with headache in emergency department: A retrospective observational study.《曼彻斯特分诊系统在急诊科头痛患者临床风险分层中的表现:一项回顾性观察研究》
J Clin Nurs. 2022 Sep;31(17-18):2553-2561. doi: 10.1111/jocn.16073. Epub 2021 Oct 4.
8
Effectiveness of Manchester Triage System in risk prioritisation of patients with pulmonary embolism who present dyspnoea, chest pain or collapse.曼彻斯特分诊系统在对出现呼吸困难、胸痛或晕厥的肺栓塞患者进行风险分层中的有效性。
Int Emerg Nurs. 2020 May;50:100842. doi: 10.1016/j.ienj.2020.100842. Epub 2020 Mar 20.
9
Chest pain in the emergency department: risk stratification with Manchester triage system and HEART score.急诊科的胸痛:采用曼彻斯特分诊系统和HEART评分进行风险分层
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2015 Jun 11;15:48. doi: 10.1186/s12872-015-0049-6.
10
Factors that influence care priority for chest pain patients using the manchester triage system.影响使用曼彻斯特分诊系统的胸痛患者护理优先级的因素。
J Clin Nurs. 2018 Mar;27(5-6):e940-e950. doi: 10.1111/jocn.14011. Epub 2018 Jan 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of Standardized Mortality Ratios in seven Dutch EDs based on presenting complaints.基于就诊主诉的荷兰七家急诊科标准化死亡率比值比较。
BMC Emerg Med. 2025 Mar 28;25(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s12873-025-01200-4.
2
Arterial Blood Gas Analysis and Clinical Decision-Making in Emergency and Intensive Care Unit Nurses: A Performance Evaluation.急诊与重症监护病房护士的动脉血气分析与临床决策:一项绩效评估
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Jan 28;13(3):261. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13030261.
3
The effectiveness of a modified Manchester Triage System for geriatric patients: A retrospective quantitative study.
改良曼彻斯特分诊系统对老年患者的有效性:一项回顾性定量研究。
Nurs Open. 2024 Sep;11(9):e70024. doi: 10.1002/nop2.70024.
4
Machine learning based prediction models for analyzing risk factors in patients with acute abdominal pain: a retrospective study.基于机器学习的急性腹痛患者危险因素分析预测模型:一项回顾性研究。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Jun 5;11:1354925. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1354925. eCollection 2024.
5
Triaging and referring in adjacent general and emergency departments (the TRIAGE trial): A cluster randomised controlled trial.分诊和转诊相邻综合和急诊部门(TRIAGE 试验):一项整群随机对照试验。
PLoS One. 2021 Nov 3;16(11):e0258561. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258561. eCollection 2021.