• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

发热患者分诊:曼彻斯特分诊系统对脓毒症或感染性休克的预测准确性和七天死亡率。

Triage of patients with fever: The Manchester triage system's predictive validity for sepsis or septic shock and seven-day mortality.

机构信息

Emergency Department, Hospital of Merano (SABES-ASDAA), Merano-Meran, Italy.

College of Health Care Professions Claudiana, Bolzano-Bozen, Italy; Institute of Nursing Science, Department of Public Health, University of Basel, Switzerland.

出版信息

J Crit Care. 2020 Oct;59:63-69. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2020.05.019. Epub 2020 Jun 6.

DOI:10.1016/j.jcrc.2020.05.019
PMID:32535339
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Up to 15% of patients arrive in the emergency department suffering from fever. Triage is their first contact and is responsible for the stratification of patients according to the severity of the condition for which they are presenting at the emergency department. The aim of this study is to assess the predictive validity of the Manchester Triage System in patients with fever for sepsis or septic shock and seven-day mortality.

METHODS

The sensitivity, specificity and negative predictive value of the Manchester Triage System was assessed by priority code allocation towards seven-day mortality and the diagnosis of sepsis or septic shock.

RESULTS

A total of 3831 patients were evaluated in the emergency department for fever between 1 January 2017 and 30 June 2019. Of these, 1.9% were diagnosed with sepsis or septic shock. Using the Manchester Triage System to predict diagnosis of sepsis or septic shock provided a sensitivity of 88.7%, a specificity of 50.1% and a negative predictive value of 99.5%. For seven-day mortality, sensitivity was 44.4%, specificity was 92.3% and the negative predictive value was 99.3%.

CONCLUSION

The Manchester Triage System has demonstrated high sensitivity and negative predictive value in patients with fever diagnosed with sepsis or septic shock. For patients with sepsis or septic shock one-third of cases with an incorrectly assigned priority code were caused by incorrect application of the Manchester Triage System.

摘要

目的

多达 15%的患者在急诊科就诊时出现发热。分诊是他们的首次接触,负责根据患者在急诊科就诊的病情严重程度对患者进行分层。本研究旨在评估曼彻斯特分诊系统对发热患者发生脓毒症或脓毒性休克和 7 天死亡率的预测准确性。

方法

通过优先级编码分配评估曼彻斯特分诊系统对 7 天死亡率和脓毒症或脓毒性休克诊断的敏感性、特异性和阴性预测值。

结果

2017 年 1 月 1 日至 2019 年 6 月 30 日,共有 3831 名发热患者在急诊科接受评估。其中,1.9%被诊断为脓毒症或脓毒性休克。使用曼彻斯特分诊系统预测脓毒症或脓毒性休克的诊断,其敏感性为 88.7%,特异性为 50.1%,阴性预测值为 99.5%。对于 7 天死亡率,敏感性为 44.4%,特异性为 92.3%,阴性预测值为 99.3%。

结论

曼彻斯特分诊系统在发热患者中诊断为脓毒症或脓毒性休克时具有较高的敏感性和阴性预测值。对于脓毒症或脓毒性休克患者,三分之一优先级编码分配错误的病例是由于曼彻斯特分诊系统的错误应用所致。

相似文献

1
Triage of patients with fever: The Manchester triage system's predictive validity for sepsis or septic shock and seven-day mortality.发热患者分诊:曼彻斯特分诊系统对脓毒症或感染性休克的预测准确性和七天死亡率。
J Crit Care. 2020 Oct;59:63-69. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2020.05.019. Epub 2020 Jun 6.
2
National early warning score at Emergency Department triage may allow earlier identification of patients with severe sepsis and septic shock: a retrospective observational study.急诊科分诊时的国家早期预警评分可能有助于更早识别严重脓毒症和感染性休克患者:一项回顾性观察研究。
Emerg Med J. 2016 Jan;33(1):37-41. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2014-204465. Epub 2015 May 13.
3
Shock index and modified shock index as triage screening tools for sepsis.休克指数和改良休克指数作为脓毒症分诊筛查工具。
J Infect Public Health. 2019 Nov-Dec;12(6):822-826. doi: 10.1016/j.jiph.2019.05.002. Epub 2019 May 18.
4
Acute abdominal pain in triage: A retrospective observational study of the Manchester triage system's validity.分诊中的急性腹痛:曼彻斯特分诊系统有效性的回顾性观察研究。
J Clin Nurs. 2021 Apr;30(7-8):942-951. doi: 10.1111/jocn.15635. Epub 2021 Jan 25.
5
Performance of the Manchester Triage System in patients with dyspnoea: A retrospective observational study.曼彻斯特分诊系统在呼吸困难患者中的表现:一项回顾性观察研究。
Int Emerg Nurs. 2020 Nov;53:100931. doi: 10.1016/j.ienj.2020.100931. Epub 2020 Oct 6.
6
The role of soluble thrombomodulin in the risk stratification and prognosis evaluation of septic patients in the emergency department.可溶性血栓调节蛋白在急诊科脓毒症患者危险分层和预后评估中的作用。
Thromb Res. 2013 Oct;132(4):471-6. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2013.08.011. Epub 2013 Aug 28.
7
Hypoalbuminemia, Low Base Excess Values, and Tachypnea Predict 28-Day Mortality in Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock Patients in the Emergency Department.低白蛋白血症、低碱剩余值及呼吸急促可预测急诊科严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克患者的28天死亡率。
Yonsei Med J. 2016 Nov;57(6):1361-9. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2016.57.6.1361.
8
Time Spent in the Emergency Department and Outcomes in Patients With Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock.严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克患者在急诊科的停留时间及预后
Adv Emerg Nurs J. 2018 Apr/Jun;40(2):94-103. doi: 10.1097/TME.0000000000000188.
9
Evaluation of an emergency department triage screening tool for suspected severe sepsis and septic shock.急诊科对疑似严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克的分诊筛查工具的评估。
J Healthc Qual. 2014 Jan-Feb;36(1):52-61; quiz 59-61. doi: 10.1111/jhq.12055.
10
Validity of the Manchester Triage System in patients with sepsis presenting at the ED: a first assessment.曼彻斯特分诊系统在急诊科脓毒症患者中的有效性:首次评估。
Emerg Med J. 2017 Apr;34(4):212-218. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2015-205309. Epub 2016 Dec 19.

引用本文的文献

1
[Patients with cancer: a challenge for emergency departments].癌症患者:急诊科面临的一项挑战
Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed. 2025 Aug 14. doi: 10.1007/s00063-025-01311-7.
2
Risk factors for readmission of COVID-19 ICU survivors: A three-year follow up.新型冠状病毒肺炎重症监护病房幸存者再入院的危险因素:一项为期三年的随访研究
Indian J Med Res. 2025 Feb;161(2):190-198. doi: 10.25259/IJMR_726_2024.
3
Interpretable machine learning for predicting sepsis risk in emergency triage patients.用于预测急诊分诊患者脓毒症风险的可解释机器学习
Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 6;15(1):887. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-85121-z.
4
Validation and comparison of triage-based screening strategies for sepsis.基于分诊的脓毒症筛查策略的验证和比较。
Am J Emerg Med. 2024 Nov;85:140-147. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2024.08.037. Epub 2024 Sep 2.
5
Diagnosis of sepsis in the emergency department: a real-world analysis from Lombardy, Italy.急诊科脓毒症的诊断:来自意大利伦巴第的真实世界分析。
Intern Emerg Med. 2024 Mar;19(2):313-320. doi: 10.1007/s11739-023-03464-9. Epub 2023 Nov 8.
6
The ROX index can be a useful tool for the triage evaluation of COVID-19 patients with dyspnoea.ROX 指数可作为一种有用的工具,用于对有呼吸困难的 COVID-19 患者进行分诊评估。
J Adv Nurs. 2021 Aug;77(8):3361-3369. doi: 10.1111/jan.14848. Epub 2021 Apr 1.