College of Nursing, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee, USA.
Capital Caring Health, Falls Church, Virginia, USA.
J Palliat Med. 2021 Sep;24(9):1291-1298. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2020.0495. Epub 2021 Jan 12.
Concurrent care enables seriously ill pediatric Medicaid and Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP) beneficiaries to continue curative treatments along with the supportive services usually associated with hospice care. Although a few studies have examined pediatric concurrent care, none has explored the economics of this care delivery approach for medically complex children. The purpose of this study was to identify the cost components relevant for an economic analysis of pediatric concurrent hospice care and demonstrate the use of the cost components in an economic case illustration. A scoping review of the hospice cost literature was conducted to identify article focused on hospice costs that were published in the journal literature from 2000 to 2019. A preliminary economic analysis was also conducted using a cost-minimization approach with data from a large mid-Atlantic pediatric hospice provider. We compared costs between concurrent versus standard hospice care for children. Fifteen hospice cost articles were identified and no article on concurrent care costs. Most articles in the scoping review focused on hospice personnel costs, followed by supplies/equipment, and other. Personnel and costs were higher for standard hospice children compared with concurrent care, whereas concurrent care children had higher supplies/equipment costs. Identifying cost components are critical to economic analysis of pediatric concurrent care. These findings provide preliminary evidence about the difference in costs between concurrent and standard hospice care for children.
同时提供医疗和支持性服务,使重病的儿童医疗补助和儿童健康保险计划(CHIP)受益人与姑息治疗一起继续接受治疗。虽然有几项研究考察了儿科同时提供医疗和支持性服务,但没有一项研究探讨了这种为病情复杂的儿童提供医疗服务的经济模式。本研究旨在确定与儿科同时提供医疗和支持性服务的经济分析相关的成本构成,并展示如何在经济案例说明中使用这些成本构成。对姑息治疗成本文献进行了范围界定审查,以确定 2000 年至 2019 年在期刊文献中发表的以姑息治疗成本为重点的文章。还使用来自大型大西洋中部地区儿科姑息治疗提供商的数据,采用成本最小化方法进行了初步经济分析。我们比较了儿童同时提供医疗和支持性服务与标准姑息治疗之间的成本。确定了 15 篇姑息治疗成本文章,但没有一篇关于同时提供医疗和支持性服务成本的文章。范围界定审查中的大多数文章都集中在姑息治疗人员成本上,其次是用品/设备和其他方面。与同时提供医疗和支持性服务的儿童相比,标准姑息治疗的儿童的人员和成本更高,而同时提供医疗和支持性服务的儿童的用品/设备成本更高。确定成本构成对于儿科同时提供医疗和支持性服务的经济分析至关重要。这些发现提供了有关儿童同时提供医疗和支持性服务与标准姑息治疗之间成本差异的初步证据。