Suppr超能文献

人类的序贯脉冲除颤:使用心外膜电极的正交序贯脉冲除颤。

Sequential pulse defibrillation in humans: orthogonal sequential pulse defibrillation with epicardial electrodes.

作者信息

Jones D L, Klein G J, Guiraudon G M, Sharma A D

机构信息

Department of Medicine, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada.

出版信息

J Am Coll Cardiol. 1988 Mar;11(3):590-6. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(88)91536-7.

Abstract

A newly described sequential pulse technique, using four mesh electrodes positioned to approximate a true orthogonal system around the heart, was compared with a single pulse system using two of these same electrodes, which were located in positions that would be used for an automatic implantable defibrillator. The influence of electrode size was also assessed. The minimal energy necessary for defibrillation (defibrillation threshold) was determined intraoperatively in 21 volunteer patients undergoing accessory pathway ablation of Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome. Ventricular fibrillation was induced with alternating current. Ten seconds after fibrillation onset defibrillation shocks were begun using either the single or the sequential pulse technique with stored voltage incremented until defibrillation was accomplished (defibrillation threshold). Selection of the use of a single or sequential pulse technique for the initial attempt was randomized. Defibrillation thresholds were determined in three groups of patients: 1) those with four small mesh electrodes (6 cm2), 2) those with two small and two large (13 cm2) mesh electrodes, and 3) those with four large mesh electrodes. In all cases, the average minimal energy needed for sequential pulse defibrillation was less than that required for single pulse defibrillation in the same patients with the same electrodes (four small, 24.8 +/- 24.7 J single versus 6.7 +/- 8.3 J sequential; two small plus two large, 11.4 +/- 15.0 J single versus 2.7 +/- 1.4 J sequential; four large, 8.1 +/- 5.3 J single versus 3.9 +/- 2.6 J sequential). Using the 6 cm2 electrodes for single pulse defibrillation energies delivered at greater than 45 J in two patients failed to defibrillate the heart.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

一种新描述的序贯脉冲技术,使用围绕心脏定位以近似真正正交系统的四个网状电极,与使用这四个相同电极中的两个的单脉冲系统进行了比较,这两个电极位于自动植入式除颤器所使用的位置。还评估了电极大小的影响。在21例接受 Wolff-Parkinson-White 综合征旁路消融术的志愿者患者中,术中确定除颤所需的最小能量(除颤阈值)。用交流电诱发心室颤动。颤动开始10秒后,使用单脉冲或序贯脉冲技术开始除颤电击,储存电压逐渐增加直至完成除颤(除颤阈值)。首次尝试使用单脉冲或序贯脉冲技术的选择是随机的。在三组患者中确定除颤阈值:1)使用四个小网状电极(6平方厘米)的患者,2)使用两个小电极和两个大电极(13平方厘米)的患者,3)使用四个大网状电极的患者。在所有情况下,相同患者使用相同电极时,序贯脉冲除颤所需的平均最小能量低于单脉冲除颤所需的能量(四个小电极,单脉冲为24.8±24.7焦耳,序贯为6.7±8.3焦耳;两个小电极加两个大电极,单脉冲为11.4±15.0焦耳,序贯为2.7±1.4焦耳;四个大电极,单脉冲为8.1±5.3焦耳,序贯为3.9±2.6焦耳)。在两名患者中,使用6平方厘米电极进行单脉冲除颤时,能量大于45焦耳未能使心脏除颤。(摘要截短于250字)

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验