Suppr超能文献

醋酸阿比特龙联合泼尼松与联合雄激素阻断治疗高危转移性激素敏感性前列腺癌的比较

[Comparison of Abiraterone Acetate Plus Prednisolone and Combined Androgen Blockade in High-risk Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer].

作者信息

Yasukawa Hitomi, Ikehata Yoshinori, Tsuboi Yasumasa, Nishiyama Naotaka, Watanabe Akihiko, Fujiuchi Yasuyoshi, Kitamura Hiroshi

机构信息

The Department of Urology, University of Toyama.

出版信息

Hinyokika Kiyo. 2020 Dec;66(12):427-432. doi: 10.14989/ActaUrolJap_66_12_427.

Abstract

Abiraterone acetate plus prednisone/prednisolone (AAP) and androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) was approved for the treatment of high-risk metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) in Japan in 2018. We investigated 22 patients with mHSPC showing ≥2 of 3 high-risk factors (Gleason score ≥8, ≥3 bone lesions or measurable visceral metastases) who received AAP plus ADT at our hospital between March 2018 and October 2019. We compared outcomes between the propensity-score matched AAP plus ADT group and the combined androgen blockade (CAB) group (19 matched pairs, 38 patients) to evaluate the efficacy and safety of AAP plus ADT. Prostate-specific antigen progression-free survival (PSA-PFS) was significantly longer in the AAP group than in the CAB group (not reached vs 15.1 months, p=0.014). Time to achievement of serum PSA ≤0.2 ng/ml and ≤0.1 ng/ml was shorter in the AAP group than in the CAB group (6.4 months vs not reached, p=0.001 and 11.0 months vs not reached, p=0.004, respectively). Although no significant intergroup difference was observed in the overall survival rates and PSA-PFS2 (PSAPFS on subsequent anticancer therapy) owing to the shorter follow-up in the AAP group, our data suggest that the clinical efficacy of AAP is betterthan that of CAB in patients with mHSPC.

摘要

醋酸阿比特龙联合泼尼松/泼尼松龙(AAP)及雄激素剥夺疗法(ADT)于2018年在日本被批准用于治疗高危转移性激素敏感性前列腺癌(mHSPC)。我们调查了22例mHSPC患者,这些患者具有3项高危因素中的≥2项( Gleason评分≥8、≥3处骨转移灶或可测量的内脏转移),于2018年3月至2019年10月在我院接受AAP联合ADT治疗。我们比较了倾向评分匹配的AAP联合ADT组与联合雄激素阻断(CAB)组(19对匹配,38例患者)的结局,以评估AAP联合ADT的疗效和安全性。AAP组的前列腺特异性抗原无进展生存期(PSA-PFS)显著长于CAB组(未达到 vs 15.1个月,p=0.014)。AAP组达到血清PSA≤0.2 ng/ml和≤0.1 ng/ml的时间短于CAB组(分别为6.4个月 vs 未达到,p=0.001和11.0个月 vs 未达到,p=0.004)。尽管由于AAP组随访时间较短,两组在总生存率和PSA-PFS2(后续抗癌治疗时的PSA-PFS)方面未观察到显著差异,但我们的数据表明,AAP对mHSPC患者的临床疗效优于CAB。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验