• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

醋酸阿比特龙联合泼尼松与联合雄激素阻断治疗高危转移性激素敏感性前列腺癌的比较

[Comparison of Abiraterone Acetate Plus Prednisolone and Combined Androgen Blockade in High-risk Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer].

作者信息

Yasukawa Hitomi, Ikehata Yoshinori, Tsuboi Yasumasa, Nishiyama Naotaka, Watanabe Akihiko, Fujiuchi Yasuyoshi, Kitamura Hiroshi

机构信息

The Department of Urology, University of Toyama.

出版信息

Hinyokika Kiyo. 2020 Dec;66(12):427-432. doi: 10.14989/ActaUrolJap_66_12_427.

DOI:10.14989/ActaUrolJap_66_12_427
PMID:33435652
Abstract

Abiraterone acetate plus prednisone/prednisolone (AAP) and androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) was approved for the treatment of high-risk metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) in Japan in 2018. We investigated 22 patients with mHSPC showing ≥2 of 3 high-risk factors (Gleason score ≥8, ≥3 bone lesions or measurable visceral metastases) who received AAP plus ADT at our hospital between March 2018 and October 2019. We compared outcomes between the propensity-score matched AAP plus ADT group and the combined androgen blockade (CAB) group (19 matched pairs, 38 patients) to evaluate the efficacy and safety of AAP plus ADT. Prostate-specific antigen progression-free survival (PSA-PFS) was significantly longer in the AAP group than in the CAB group (not reached vs 15.1 months, p=0.014). Time to achievement of serum PSA ≤0.2 ng/ml and ≤0.1 ng/ml was shorter in the AAP group than in the CAB group (6.4 months vs not reached, p=0.001 and 11.0 months vs not reached, p=0.004, respectively). Although no significant intergroup difference was observed in the overall survival rates and PSA-PFS2 (PSAPFS on subsequent anticancer therapy) owing to the shorter follow-up in the AAP group, our data suggest that the clinical efficacy of AAP is betterthan that of CAB in patients with mHSPC.

摘要

醋酸阿比特龙联合泼尼松/泼尼松龙(AAP)及雄激素剥夺疗法(ADT)于2018年在日本被批准用于治疗高危转移性激素敏感性前列腺癌(mHSPC)。我们调查了22例mHSPC患者,这些患者具有3项高危因素中的≥2项( Gleason评分≥8、≥3处骨转移灶或可测量的内脏转移),于2018年3月至2019年10月在我院接受AAP联合ADT治疗。我们比较了倾向评分匹配的AAP联合ADT组与联合雄激素阻断(CAB)组(19对匹配,38例患者)的结局,以评估AAP联合ADT的疗效和安全性。AAP组的前列腺特异性抗原无进展生存期(PSA-PFS)显著长于CAB组(未达到 vs 15.1个月,p=0.014)。AAP组达到血清PSA≤0.2 ng/ml和≤0.1 ng/ml的时间短于CAB组(分别为6.4个月 vs 未达到,p=0.001和11.0个月 vs 未达到,p=0.004)。尽管由于AAP组随访时间较短,两组在总生存率和PSA-PFS2(后续抗癌治疗时的PSA-PFS)方面未观察到显著差异,但我们的数据表明,AAP对mHSPC患者的临床疗效优于CAB。

相似文献

1
[Comparison of Abiraterone Acetate Plus Prednisolone and Combined Androgen Blockade in High-risk Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer].醋酸阿比特龙联合泼尼松与联合雄激素阻断治疗高危转移性激素敏感性前列腺癌的比较
Hinyokika Kiyo. 2020 Dec;66(12):427-432. doi: 10.14989/ActaUrolJap_66_12_427.
2
Patient-reported outcomes following abiraterone acetate plus prednisone added to androgen deprivation therapy in patients with newly diagnosed metastatic castration-naive prostate cancer (LATITUDE): an international, randomised phase 3 trial.新诊断转移性去势敏感性前列腺癌患者中阿比特龙联合泼尼松添加到雄激素剥夺治疗后的患者报告结局(LATITUDE):一项国际性、随机 3 期临床试验。
Lancet Oncol. 2018 Feb;19(2):194-206. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30911-7. Epub 2018 Jan 8.
3
Adding abiraterone to androgen deprivation therapy in men with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.在转移性激素敏感性前列腺癌男性患者中,在雄激素剥夺治疗基础上加用阿比特龙:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur J Cancer. 2017 Oct;84:88-101. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2017.07.003. Epub 2017 Aug 8.
4
Efficacy and safety of abiraterone acetate plus prednisolone in patients with early metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer who failed first-line androgen-deprivation therapy: a single-arm, phase 4 study.醋酸阿比特龙联合泼尼松治疗一线去势治疗失败的转移性去势抵抗性前列腺癌患者的疗效和安全性:一项单臂、4 期研究。
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2021 Apr 1;51(4):544-551. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyaa225.
5
Comparison of Abiraterone and Combined Androgen Blockade Therapy for High-Risk Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.阿比特龙与联合雄激素阻断疗法治疗高危转移性激素敏感性前列腺癌的比较:一项倾向评分匹配分析
Front Oncol. 2021 Dec 21;11:769068. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.769068. eCollection 2021.
6
Correlation of Prostate-specific Antigen Kinetics with Overall Survival and Radiological Progression-free Survival in Metastatic Castration-sensitive Prostate Cancer Treated with Abiraterone Acetate plus Prednisone or Placebos Added to Androgen Deprivation Therapy: Post Hoc Analysis of Phase 3 LATITUDE Study.醋酸阿比特龙联合泼尼松或安慰剂添加到雄激素剥夺治疗中治疗转移性去势敏感性前列腺癌与总生存和影像学无进展生存的前列腺特异性抗原动力学的相关性:LATITUDE 研究的事后分析 3 期。
Eur Urol. 2020 Apr;77(4):494-500. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.11.021. Epub 2019 Dec 13.
7
Abiraterone acetate plus prednisolone for metastatic patients starting hormone therapy: 5-year follow-up results from the STAMPEDE randomised trial (NCT00268476).醋酸阿比特龙联合泼尼松治疗开始激素治疗的转移性患者:来自 STAMPEDE 随机试验的 5 年随访结果(NCT00268476)。
Int J Cancer. 2022 Aug 1;151(3):422-434. doi: 10.1002/ijc.34018. Epub 2022 May 16.
8
Hormone naïve metastatic prostate cancer: How to treat it?激素初治转移性前列腺癌:如何治疗?
Arch Esp Urol. 2019 Mar;72(2):192-202.
9
Efficacy of abiraterone acetate for high-risk hormone-naïve metastatic prostate cancer: A comparison with combined androgen blockade therapy with bicalutamide and androgen deprivation therapy alone.醋酸阿比特龙治疗高危激素初治转移性前列腺癌的疗效:与比卡鲁胺联合雄激素剥夺疗法和单纯雄激素剥夺疗法的比较。
PLoS One. 2022 Oct 20;17(10):e0276081. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276081. eCollection 2022.
10
Treatment of patients with newly diagnosed metastatic hormone sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) in Belgium: a real world data analysis.比利时新诊断的转移性激素敏感性前列腺癌(mHSPC)患者的治疗:一项真实世界数据分析。
Acta Clin Belg. 2022 Dec;77(6):897-905. doi: 10.1080/17843286.2021.2001999. Epub 2021 Nov 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Treatment-Emergent Co-Morbidities and Survival in Patients With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Receiving Abiraterone or Enzalutamide.接受阿比特龙或恩杂鲁胺治疗的转移性去势抵抗性前列腺癌患者的治疗引发的共病与生存情况
Front Pharmacol. 2021 May 18;12:669236. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.669236. eCollection 2021.