Lin Yi-Ting, Huang Yen-Chun, Liu Chih-Kuan, Lee Tian-Shyug, Chen Mingchih, Chien Yu-Ning
Graduate Institute of Business Administration, College of Management, Fu Jen Catholic University, New Taipei City, Taiwan.
AI Development Centers, Fu Jen Catholic University, New Taipei City, Taiwan.
Front Pharmacol. 2021 May 18;12:669236. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.669236. eCollection 2021.
Secondary hormone therapy, abiraterone and enzalutamide, has improved outcomes for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) and prolonged patients' lives significantly. Various studies have compared the cancer-related outcomes, adverse effects, and drug-induced comorbidities in patients with mCRPC who are treated with abiraterone or enzalutamide. However, few studies have explored associations between survival and comorbidities or comprehensive analyzed newly developed comorbidities during and after secondary hormone therapy. We attempted to clarify whether the Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) overall or itemized is predictive for overall survival, and we compared newly developed comorbidities between abiraterone and enzalutamide groups. We extracted data about expenses and comorbidities for patients who have mCRPC, received abiraterone and enzalutamide and met pre-examination operation criteria between September 2016 and December 2017 from the Taiwan National Health Insurance database. A total of 1153 patients with mCRPC who received abiraterone ( = 782) or enzalutamide ( = 371) with or without previous chemotherapy were included. We used the propensity score to match confounding factors, including age, pre-existing comorbidities, and precipitating factors for comorbidity (e.g., hypertension, hyperlipidemia), to eliminate selection bias in the comparison of newly developed comorbidities. Cox regression analysis was used for overall survival. We found that enzalutamide is superior to abiraterone with regard to overall survival. Our study revealed that there is no statistically significant difference in development of new comorbidities between abiraterone and enzalutamide group. Moreover, the CCI score, rather than any single item of the CCI, was a statistically significant predictor for overall survival.
二线激素疗法阿比特龙和恩杂鲁胺改善了转移性去势抵抗性前列腺癌(mCRPC)的治疗效果,并显著延长了患者的生命。多项研究比较了接受阿比特龙或恩杂鲁胺治疗的mCRPC患者的癌症相关结局、不良反应和药物诱发的合并症。然而,很少有研究探讨生存与合并症之间的关联,或全面分析二线激素治疗期间及之后新出现的合并症。我们试图明确查尔森合并症指数(CCI)整体或分项是否可预测总生存期,并比较阿比特龙组和恩杂鲁胺组新出现的合并症。我们从台湾国民健康保险数据库中提取了2016年9月至2017年12月期间患有mCRPC、接受阿比特龙和恩杂鲁胺治疗且符合检查前操作标准的患者的费用和合并症数据。总共纳入了1153例接受阿比特龙(n = 782)或恩杂鲁胺(n = 371)治疗、有或无既往化疗史的mCRPC患者。我们使用倾向评分来匹配混杂因素,包括年龄、既往合并症以及合并症的诱发因素(如高血压、高脂血症),以消除新出现合并症比较中的选择偏倚。采用Cox回归分析评估总生存期。我们发现恩杂鲁胺在总生存期方面优于阿比特龙。我们的研究表明,阿比特龙组和恩杂鲁胺组新合并症的发生在统计学上无显著差异。此外,是CCI评分而非CCI的任何单项在统计学上是总生存期的显著预测指标。