Suppr超能文献

用需求跟踪问卷定义不同医学专业的能力特征 - 一项为医学生选择研究生培训提供框架的初步研究。

Defining competence profiles of different medical specialties with the requirement-tracking questionnaire - a pilot study to provide a framework for medial students' choice of postgraduate training.

机构信息

III. Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, D-20246, Hamburg, Germany.

German Aerospace Center (DLR), Hamburg, Germany.

出版信息

BMC Med Educ. 2021 Jan 12;21(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-02479-6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The medical specialties are characterised by a great diversity in their daily work which requires different sets of competences. A requirement analysis would help to establish competence profiles of the different medical specialities. The aim of this pilot study was to define competence profiles for individual medical specialties. This could provide a framework as support for medical graduates who wish to choose a medical specialty for their postgraduate training.

METHODS

In February 2020, physicians were invited via the State Chamber of Physicians' monthly journal to electronically fill out the requirement tracking (R-Track) questionnaire. It contains 63 aspects assigned to six areas of competence: "Mental abilities", "Sensory abilities", "Psychomotor and multitasking abilities", "Social interactive competences", "Motivation", and "Personality traits". The expression of the different aspects was assessed on a 5-point Likert scale (1: "very low" to 5: "very high"). Sociodemographic data and information about the current workplace (hospital or practice) were also collected.

RESULTS

In total, 195 practicing physicians from 19 different specialities followed the invitation by the State Chamber of Physicians to participate in this survey. For almost all medical specialties, the competence area "Motivation" reached rank 1. "Psychomotor and multitasking abilities" received high ranks among specialties performing surgical activities, while "Social interactive competences" and "Personality traits" were highly rated by specialties with an intense level of patient-physician-interaction. "Mental abilities" were only rated highly by radiologists (rank 2) and physiologists (rank 3) while "Sensory abilities" were generally rated very low with the expression (rank 4) for anaesthesiology and ENT.

CONCLUSIONS

In this pilot study, a first outline of competences profiles for 17 medical specialties were defined. The specific "Motivation" for a medical specialty seemed to play the greatest role for most specialties. This first specialty specific competence framework could provide a first insight into specific competences required by medical specialties and could serve medical graduate as a decision aid when looking for a medical specialty for their postgraduate training.

摘要

背景

医学专业的日常工作具有高度多样性,需要不同的能力。需求分析将有助于确定不同医学专业的能力概况。本初步研究的目的是为各个医学专业定义能力概况。这可以为希望选择医学专业进行研究生培训的医学毕业生提供一个框架作为支持。

方法

2020 年 2 月,医师通过州医师协会月刊邀请他们填写需求跟踪(R-Track)问卷。它包含 63 个方面,分为六个能力领域:“心理能力”、“感官能力”、“心理运动和多任务能力”、“社会互动能力”、“动机”和“个性特征”。不同方面的表达在 5 点李克特量表上进行评估(1:“非常低”至 5:“非常高”)。还收集了社会人口统计学数据和当前工作场所(医院或诊所)的信息。

结果

共有 195 名来自 19 个不同专业的执业医师响应了州医师协会的邀请参加了这项调查。对于几乎所有医学专业来说,“动机”能力领域都排名第一。进行外科活动的专业对“心理运动和多任务能力”的评价较高,而与患者-医生互动强度较高的专业则对“社会互动能力”和“个性特征”的评价较高。“心理能力”仅被放射科医生(排名 2)和生理学家(排名 3)评为高度评价,而“感官能力”则普遍被麻醉科和耳鼻喉科评为非常低(排名 4)。

结论

在这项初步研究中,为 17 个医学专业定义了能力概况的初步概述。对医学专业的特定“动机”似乎对大多数专业都起着最大的作用。这个第一个专业特定的能力框架可以为医学专业所需的特定能力提供一个初步的了解,并可以为医学毕业生在寻找医学专业进行研究生培训时提供决策帮助。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

1
Designing the Third- and Fourth-Years Clerkship Schedule.设计第三年和第四年实习课程表。
J Emerg Med. 2020 Mar;58(3):e173-e176. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2019.11.026. Epub 2020 Jan 7.
5
Guidelines to the Practice of Anesthesia - Revised Edition 2019.麻醉实践指南-2019 年修订版。
Can J Anaesth. 2019 Jan;66(1):75-108. doi: 10.1007/s12630-018-1248-2. Epub 2018 Dec 17.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验